Oracle Critical Patch Update July 2019
Released July 2019 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, April 2019 · Critical Patch Update, October 2019 →
207 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
25Protected by Waratek2Mitigation candidate64No exploit published55Outside Waratek scope61Not applicable
11Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 58 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 13 matches · 8 in Waratek scope · 7 protected · 8 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 10 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
7
53.8%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
7.7%
Outside Waratek scope
4
30.8%
Not applicable
1
7.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
7
53.8%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
6
46.2%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
8
61.5%
Working exploit published
3
23.1%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
2
15.4%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 6 / quarter
Q2 141
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q3 140
Q4 140
Q1 150
Q2 150
Q3 150
Q4 150
Q1 160
Q2 160
Q3 160
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 181
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q2 181
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Forecast only1
Q3 180
Q4 181
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q1 192
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
Critical1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited2
Q2 196
Protected by Waratek3
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope2
Critical2
High3
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked3
Exploited5
Forecast only1
Q2 14Q4 14Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-2729 | Critical | 2019-06-19 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services). Supported versions that are affected are 10.3.6.0.0, 12.1.3.0.0 and 12.2.1.3.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2019-2725 | Critical | 2019-04-26 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component of Oracle Fusion Middleware (subcomponent: Web Services). Supported versions that are affected are 10.3.6.0.0 and 12.1.3.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebLogic Server. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebLogic Server. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2019-11358 | Medium | 2019-04-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. |
| CVE-2019-0232 | High | 2019-04-15 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | When running on Windows with enableCmdLineArguments enabled, the CGI Servlet in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.17, 8.5.0 to 8.5.39 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.93 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution due to a bug in the way the JRE passes command line arguments to Windows. The CGI Servlet is disabled by default. The CGI option enableCmdLineArguments is disable by default in Tomcat 9.0.x (and will be disabled by default in all versions in response to this vulnerability). For a detailed explanation of the JRE behaviour, see Markus Wulftange's blog (https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2016/02/java-and-command-line-injections-in-windows.html) and this archived MSDN blog (https://web.archive.org/web/20161228144344/https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/twistylittlepassagesallalike/2011/04/23/everyone-quotes-command-line-arguments-the-wrong-way/). |
| CVE-2019-0199 | High | 2019-04-10 | No exploit published | Forecast only | The HTTP/2 implementation in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.14 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.37 accepted streams with excessive numbers of SETTINGS frames and also permitted clients to keep streams open without reading/writing request/response data. By keeping streams open for requests that utilised the Servlet API's blocking I/O, clients were able to cause server-side threads to block eventually leading to thread exhaustion and a DoS. |
| CVE-2019-0211 | High | 2019-04-08 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4 releases 2.4.17 to 2.4.38, with MPM event, worker or prefork, code executing in less-privileged child processes or threads (including scripts executed by an in-process scripting interpreter) could execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the parent process (usually root) by manipulating the scoreboard. Non-Unix systems are not affected. |
| CVE-2019-0192 | Critical | 2019-03-07 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | In Apache Solr versions 5.0.0 to 5.5.5 and 6.0.0 to 6.6.5, the Config API allows to configure the JMX server via an HTTP POST request. By pointing it to a malicious RMI server, an attacker could take advantage of Solr's unsafe deserialization to trigger remote code execution on the Solr side. |
| CVE-2019-0190 | High | 2019-01-30 | Not applicable | Exploited | A bug exists in the way mod_ssl handled client renegotiations. A remote attacker could send a carefully crafted request that would cause mod_ssl to enter a loop leading to a denial of service. This bug can be only triggered with Apache HTTP Server version 2.4.37 when using OpenSSL version 1.1.1 or later, due to an interaction in changes to handling of renegotiation attempts. |
| CVE-2018-11784 | Medium | 2018-10-04 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | When the default servlet in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.11, 8.5.0 to 8.5.33 and 7.0.23 to 7.0.90 returned a redirect to a directory (e.g. redirecting to '/foo/' when the user requested '/foo') a specially crafted URL could be used to cause the redirect to be generated to any URI of the attackers choice. |
| CVE-2018-1275 | Critical | 2018-04-11 | Protected by Waratek | Forecast only | Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.16 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a remote code execution attack. This CVE addresses the partial fix for CVE-2018-1270 in the 4.3.x branch of the Spring Framework. |
| CVE-2017-5715 | Medium | 2018-01-04 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. |
| CVE-2017-5645 | Critical | 2017-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another application, a specially crafted binary payload can be sent that, when deserialized, can execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2014-0114 | High | 2014-04-30 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Commons BeanUtils, as distributed in lib/commons-beanutils-1.8.0.jar in Apache Struts 1.x through 1.3.10 and in other products requiring commons-beanutils through 1.9.2, does not suppress the class property, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via the class parameter, as demonstrated by the passing of this parameter to the getClass method of the ActionForm object in Struts 1. |