Oracle Critical Patch Update July 2017
Released July 2017 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, April 2017 · Critical Patch Update, October 2017 →
272 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
15Protected by Waratek3Mitigation candidate131No exploit published30Outside Waratek scope93Not applicable
3Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 126 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 3 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
3matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
1exploited33.3%
1CISA KEV33.3%
1public PoC33.3%
2EPSS ≥ 0.566.7%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
3
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
3
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
33.3%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
1
33.3%
No public exploit
1
33.3%
split by
peak 3 / month
May 17
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3732 | Medium | 2017-05-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem. |
| CVE-2017-3731 | High | 2017-05-04 | Not applicable | Forecast only | If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k. |
| CVE-2017-5689 | Critical | 2017-05-02 | Not applicable | Exploited | An unprivileged network attacker could gain system privileges to provisioned Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT) and Intel Standard Manageability (ISM). An unprivileged local attacker could provision manageability features gaining unprivileged network or local system privileges on Intel manageability SKUs: Intel Active Management Technology (AMT), Intel Standard Manageability (ISM), and Intel Small Business Technology (SBT). |