Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2016
Released October 2016 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2016 · Critical Patch Update, January 2017 →
205 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
7Protected by Waratek2Mitigation candidate87No exploit published39Outside Waratek scope68Not applicable2Withdrawn CVE
4Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 83 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 6 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 2 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
16.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
16.7%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
2
33.3%
Withdrawn CVE
2
33.3%
blocked by ARMR today
1
16.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5
83.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
33.3%
Working exploit published
4
66.7%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q2 161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q3 161
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q4 163
Mitigation candidate1
Withdrawn CVE2
High1
Unknown2
not blocked3
Working exploit published3
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q2 16Q3 16Q4 16Q1 17Q2 17Q3 17Q4 17
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-7501 | Critical | 2017-11-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. |
| CVE-2016-5617 | Unknown | 2016-10-25 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-6664. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-6664. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-6664 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2016-5616 | Unknown | 2016-10-25 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-6663. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-6663. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-6663 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2016-3473 | High | 2016-10-25 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the BI Publisher (formerly XML Publisher) component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.7.0, 11.1.1.9.0, and 12.2.1.0.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-6662 | Critical | 2016-09-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Oracle MySQL through 5.5.52, 5.6.x through 5.6.33, and 5.7.x through 5.7.15; MariaDB before 5.5.51, 10.0.x before 10.0.27, and 10.1.x before 10.1.17; and Percona Server before 5.5.51-38.1, 5.6.x before 5.6.32-78.0, and 5.7.x before 5.7.14-7 allow local users to create arbitrary configurations and bypass certain protection mechanisms by setting general_log_file to a my.cnf configuration. NOTE: this can be leveraged to execute arbitrary code with root privileges by setting malloc_lib. NOTE: the affected MySQL version information is from Oracle's October 2016 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that the issue was silently patched in MySQL 5.5.52, 5.6.33, and 5.7.15. |
| CVE-2016-2107 | Medium | 2016-05-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. |