Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2016
Released October 2016 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2016 · Critical Patch Update, January 2017 →
205 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
7Protected by Waratek2Mitigation candidate87No exploit published39Outside Waratek scope68Not applicable2Withdrawn CVE
4Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 83 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 10 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 4 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 8 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
2
20.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
10.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
4
40.0%
Not applicable
3
30.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
20.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8
80.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
4
40.0%
Working exploit published
4
40.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
2
20.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q1 131
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q2 130
Q3 130
Q4 130
Q1 140
Q2 142
Mitigation candidate1
Outside Waratek scope1
High2
not blocked2
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Q3 140
Q4 140
Q1 151
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q2 150
Q3 151
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q4 150
Q1 160
Q2 162
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Q3 162
Not applicable2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
Exploited1
Forecast only1
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 171
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q2 13Q4 13Q2 14Q4 14Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-7501 | Critical | 2017-11-09 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. |
| CVE-2016-6304 | High | 2016-09-26 | Not applicable | Forecast only | Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions. |
| CVE-2016-6662 | Critical | 2016-09-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | Oracle MySQL through 5.5.52, 5.6.x through 5.6.33, and 5.7.x through 5.7.15; MariaDB before 5.5.51, 10.0.x before 10.0.27, and 10.1.x before 10.1.17; and Percona Server before 5.5.51-38.1, 5.6.x before 5.6.32-78.0, and 5.7.x before 5.7.14-7 allow local users to create arbitrary configurations and bypass certain protection mechanisms by setting general_log_file to a my.cnf configuration. NOTE: this can be leveraged to execute arbitrary code with root privileges by setting malloc_lib. NOTE: the affected MySQL version information is from Oracle's October 2016 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that the issue was silently patched in MySQL 5.5.52, 5.6.33, and 5.7.15. |
| CVE-2016-2107 | Medium | 2016-05-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. |
| CVE-2016-3081 | High | 2016-04-26 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Struts 2.3.19 to 2.3.20.2, 2.3.21 to 2.3.24.1, and 2.3.25 to 2.3.28, when Dynamic Method Invocation is enabled, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via method: prefix, related to chained expressions. |
| CVE-2015-1793 | Medium | 2015-07-09 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | The X509_verify_cert function in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1n, 1.0.1o, 1.0.2b, and 1.0.2c does not properly process X.509 Basic Constraints cA values during identification of alternative certificate chains, which allows remote attackers to spoof a Certification Authority role and trigger unintended certificate verifications via a valid leaf certificate. |
| CVE-2015-0235 | High | 2015-01-28 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Heap-based buffer overflow in the __nss_hostname_digits_dots function in glibc 2.2, and other 2.x versions before 2.18, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the (1) gethostbyname or (2) gethostbyname2 function, aka "GHOST." |
| CVE-2014-0224 | High | 2014-06-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. |
| CVE-2014-0050 | High | 2014-04-01 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | MultipartStream.java in Apache Commons FileUpload before 1.3.1, as used in Apache Tomcat, JBoss Web, and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a crafted Content-Type header that bypasses a loop's intended exit conditions. |
| CVE-2013-2566 | Medium | 2013-03-15 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext. |