Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2015
Released January 2015 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, October 2014 · Critical Patch Update, April 2015 →
155 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
2Protected by Waratek1Mitigation candidate69No exploit published32Outside Waratek scope51Not applicable
2Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 67 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 6 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 2 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC
Protected by Waratek
1
16.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
4
66.7%
Not applicable
1
16.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
16.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
5
83.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
33.3%
Working exploit published
2
33.3%
Proof of concept only
1
16.7%
Forecast only
1
16.7%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 2 / month
Apr 142
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable1
High1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Forecast only1
May 140
Jun 141
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Jul 141
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Aug 140
Sep 140
Oct 141
Outside Waratek scope1
Low1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Nov 140
Dec 140
Jan 151
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Apr 14May 14Jun 14Jul 14Aug 14Sep 14Oct 14Nov 14Dec 14Jan 15
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2014-6593 | Medium | 2015-01-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u75, 6u85, 7u72, and 8u25; Java SE Embedded 7u71 and 8u6; and JRockit 27.8.4 and 28.3.4 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to JSSE. |
| CVE-2014-3566 | Low | 2014-10-15 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue. |
| CVE-2014-0226 | Medium | 2014-07-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Race condition in the mod_status module in the Apache HTTP Server before 2.4.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow), or possibly obtain sensitive credential information or execute arbitrary code, via a crafted request that triggers improper scoreboard handling within the status_handler function in modules/generators/mod_status.c and the lua_ap_scoreboard_worker function in modules/lua/lua_request.c. |
| CVE-2014-0224 | High | 2014-06-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. |
| CVE-2014-0114 | High | 2014-04-30 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Commons BeanUtils, as distributed in lib/commons-beanutils-1.8.0.jar in Apache Struts 1.x through 1.3.10 and in other products requiring commons-beanutils through 1.9.2, does not suppress the class property, which allows remote attackers to "manipulate" the ClassLoader and execute arbitrary code via the class parameter, as demonstrated by the passing of this parameter to the getClass method of the ActionForm object in Struts 1. |
| CVE-2013-5704 | Medium | 2014-04-15 | Not applicable | Forecast only | The mod_headers module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.22 allows remote attackers to bypass "RequestHeader unset" directives by placing a header in the trailer portion of data sent with chunked transfer coding. NOTE: the vendor states "this is not a security issue in httpd as such." |