Oracle Critical Patch Update October 2012
Released October 2012 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Critical Patch Update, July 2012 · Java SE Critical Patch Update, October 2012 →
107 CVEs in this release, one square each
By status
2Protected by Waratek5Mitigation candidate61No exploit published5Outside Waratek scope34Not applicable
3Exploited, marked by the ring
No exploit published. For 61 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.
Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.
Overview 9 matches · 6 in Waratek scope · 2 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
2
22.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
4
44.4%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
11.1%
Not applicable
2
22.2%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
2
22.2%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
7
77.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
22.2%
Working exploit published
7
77.8%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
0
0.0%
split by
peak 7 / month
Jun 121
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Jul 120
Aug 120
Sep 121
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Oct 127
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate4
Not applicable1
Critical1
Medium5
Low1
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked5
Exploited2
Working exploit published5
Jun 12Jul 12Aug 12Sep 12Oct 12
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2012-3221 | Low | 2012-10-17 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle VM Virtual Box component in Oracle Virtualization 3.2, 4.0, and 4.1 allows local users to affect availability via unknown vectors related to VirtualBox Core. NOTE: The previous information was obtained from the October 2012 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from another vendor that this issue is related to "incorrect interrupt handling." |
| CVE-2012-3186 | Medium | 2012-10-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Sites component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 6.1, 6.2, 6.3.x, 7, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.3, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2, and 11.1.1.6.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Advanced UI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3183 and CVE-2012-3185. |
| CVE-2012-3185 | Medium | 2012-10-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Sites component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 6.1, 6.2, 6.3.x, 7, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.3, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2, and 11.1.1.6.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Advanced UI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3183 and CVE-2012-3186. |
| CVE-2012-3184 | Medium | 2012-10-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Sites component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 6.1, 6.2, 6.3.x, 7, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.3, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2, and 11.1.1.6.0 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Advanced UI. |
| CVE-2012-3183 | Medium | 2012-10-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Sites component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 6.1, 6.2, 6.3.x, 7, 7.0.1, 7.0.2, 7.0.3, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2, and 11.1.1.6.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Advanced UI, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-3185 and CVE-2012-3186. |
| CVE-2012-3153 | Medium | 2012-10-16 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.4, 11.1.1.6, and 11.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Servlet. NOTE: the previous information is from the October 2012 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from the original researcher that the PARSEQUERY function allows remote attackers to obtain database credentials via reports/rwservlet/parsequery, and that this issue occurs in earlier versions. NOTE: this can be leveraged with CVE-2012-3152 to execute arbitrary code by uploading a .jsp file. |
| CVE-2012-3152 | Critical | 2012-10-16 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.4, 11.1.1.6, and 11.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Report Server Component. NOTE: the previous information is from the October 2012 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from the original researcher that the URLPARAMETER functionality allows remote attackers to read and upload arbitrary files to reports/rwservlet, and that this issue occurs in earlier versions. NOTE: this can be leveraged with CVE-2012-3153 to execute arbitrary code by uploading a .jsp file. |
| CVE-2012-3137 | Medium | 2012-09-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | The authentication protocol in Oracle Database Server 10.2.0.3, 10.2.0.4, 10.2.0.5, 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.2, and 11.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to obtain the session key and salt for arbitrary users, which leaks information about the cryptographic hash and makes it easier to conduct brute force password guessing attacks, aka "stealth password cracking vulnerability." |
| CVE-2012-0217 | High | 2012-06-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The x86-64 kernel system-call functionality in Xen 4.1.2 and earlier, as used in Citrix XenServer 6.0.2 and earlier and other products; Oracle Solaris 11 and earlier; illumos before r13724; Joyent SmartOS before 20120614T184600Z; FreeBSD before 9.0-RELEASE-p3; NetBSD 6.0 Beta and earlier; Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 and R2 SP1 and Windows 7 Gold and SP1; and possibly other operating systems, when running on an Intel processor, incorrectly uses the sysret path in cases where a certain address is not a canonical address, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application. NOTE: because this issue is due to incorrect use of the Intel specification, it should have been split into separate identifiers; however, there was some value in preserving the original mapping of the multi-codebase coordinated-disclosure effort to a single identifier. |