WaratekVRT Sign in

Oracle Critical Patch Update April 2011

Released April 2011 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Java SE Critical Patch Update, February 2011 · Java SE Critical Patch Update, June 2011 →

72 CVEs in this release, one square each

Mitigation candidateMitigation candidateMitigation candidateNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedOutside Waratek scope, exploitedOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeNot applicable, exploitedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Share this chart Oracle Critical Patch Update April 2011, one square per CVE: 38 Java CVEs, 2 exploited, 34 other CVEs in this release.

Download the image

By status

3Mitigation candidate35No exploit published9Outside Waratek scope25Not applicable 2Exploited, marked by the ring

No exploit published. For 35 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.

Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Protection: None✕Published to 2011-03-31✕
Overview 12 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 2 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
12matches 1in Waratek scope8.3% 0protected0.0% 2exploited16.7% 0CISA KEV0.0% 3public PoC25.0% 2EPSS ≥ 0.516.7%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 1 8.3% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 1 8.3% Not applicable 10 83.3% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 1 8.3% High 8 66.7% Medium 3 25.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 12 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 2 16.7% Working exploit published 1 8.3% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 9 75.0%
split by peak 8 / month
Not applicable: 10Outside Waratek scope: 1Mitigation candidate: 1 Medium: 3High: 8Critical: 1 not blocked: 12 No public exploit: 9Working exploit published: 1Exploited: 2
Nov 091 Not applicable1 Critical1 not blocked1 Exploited1 Dec 090 Jan 100 Feb 100 Mar 100 Apr 100 May 100 Jun 100 Jul 100 Aug 100 Sep 100 Oct 100 Nov 100 Dec 100 Jan 118 Not applicable8 High7 Medium1 not blocked8 No public exploit8 Feb 112 Mitigation candidate1 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 Exploited1 Working exploit published1 Mar 111 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
Nov 09Jan 10Mar 10May 10Jul 10Sep 10Nov 10Jan 11Mar 11
12 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2011-0411 Medium 2011-03-16 Not applicable No public exploit The STARTTLS implementation in Postfix 2.4.x before 2.4.16, 2.5.x before 2.5.12, 2.6.x before 2.6.9, and 2.7.x before 2.7.3 does not properly restrict I/O buffering, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert commands into encrypted SMTP sessions by sending a cleartext command that is processed after TLS is in place, related to a "plaintext command injection" attack.
CVE-2010-4476 Medium 2011-02-17 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published The Double.parseDouble method in Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 23 and earlier, 5.0 Update 27 and earlier, and 1.4.2_29 and earlier, as used in OpenJDK, Apache, JBossweb, and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted string that triggers an infinite loop of estimations during conversion to a double-precision binary floating-point number, as demonstrated using 2.2250738585072012e-308.
CVE-2010-4452 High 2011-02-17 Outside Waratek scope Exploited Unspecified vulnerability in the Deployment component in Java Runtime Environment (JRE) in Oracle Java SE and Java for Business 6 Update 23 and earlier allows remote untrusted Java Web Start applications and untrusted Java applets to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors.
CVE-2010-4643 High 2011-01-28 Not applicable No public exploit Heap-based buffer overflow in Impress in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Truevision TGA (TARGA) file in an ODF or Microsoft Office document.
CVE-2010-4253 High 2011-01-28 Not applicable No public exploit Heap-based buffer overflow in Impress in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted PNG file in an ODF or Microsoft Office document, as demonstrated by a PowerPoint (aka PPT) document.
CVE-2010-3689 Medium 2011-01-28 Not applicable No public exploit soffice in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 3.x before 3.3 places a zero-length directory name in the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse shared library in the current working directory.
CVE-2010-3454 High 2011-01-28 Not applicable No public exploit Multiple off-by-one errors in the WW8DopTypography::ReadFromMem function in oowriter in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted typography information in a Microsoft Word .DOC file that triggers an out-of-bounds write.
CVE-2010-3453 High 2011-01-28 Not applicable No public exploit The WW8ListManager::WW8ListManager function in oowriter in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 does not properly handle an unspecified number of list levels in user-defined list styles in WW8 data in a Microsoft Word document, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted .DOC file that triggers an out-of-bounds write.
CVE-2010-3452 High 2011-01-28 Not applicable No public exploit Use-after-free vulnerability in oowriter in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via crafted tags in an RTF document.
CVE-2010-3451 High 2011-01-28 Not applicable No public exploit Use-after-free vulnerability in oowriter in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via malformed tables in an RTF document.
CVE-2010-3450 High 2011-01-28 Not applicable No public exploit Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in OpenOffice.org (OOo) 2.x and 3.x before 3.3 allow remote attackers to overwrite arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in an entry in (1) an XSLT JAR filter description file, (2) an Extension (aka OXT) file, or unspecified other (3) JAR or (4) ZIP files.
CVE-2009-3555 Critical 2009-11-09 Not applicable Exploited The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue.