WaratekVRT Sign in

Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2011

Released January 2011 · Oracle's advisory ↗ · ← Java SE Critical Patch Update, October 2010 · Java SE Critical Patch Update, February 2011 →

66 CVEs in this release, one square each

Protected by WaratekMitigation candidateMitigation candidateMitigation candidateNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedNo exploit publishedOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeOutside Waratek scopeNot applicable, exploitedNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
Share this chart Oracle Critical Patch Update January 2011, one square per CVE: 31 Java CVEs, 1 protected by Waratek, 1 exploited, 35 other CVEs in this release.

Download the image

By status

1Protected by Waratek3Mitigation candidate27No exploit published11Outside Waratek scope24Not applicable 1Exploited, marked by the ring

No exploit published. For 26 of them, Oracle's security advisory is the source of public detail.

Protected by Waratek. Waratek RASP can block exploitation of these on systems that have not applied the patch yet.

Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Has a public PoC✕
Overview 9 matches · 3 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
9matches 3in Waratek scope33.3% 0protected0.0% 1exploited11.1% 0CISA KEV0.0% 3EPSS ≥ 0.533.3%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 3 33.3% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 3 33.3% Not applicable 3 33.3% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 1 11.1% High 7 77.8% Medium 1 11.1% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 9 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 1 11.1% Working exploit published 8 88.9% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 8 / month
Not applicable: 3Outside Waratek scope: 3Mitigation candidate: 3 Medium: 1High: 7Critical: 1 not blocked: 9 Working exploit published: 8Exploited: 1
Nov 091 Not applicable1 Critical1 not blocked1 Exploited1 Dec 090 Jan 100 Feb 100 Mar 100 Apr 100 May 100 Jun 100 Jul 100 Aug 100 Sep 100 Oct 100 Nov 100 Dec 100 Jan 118 Mitigation candidate3 Outside Waratek scope3 Not applicable2 High7 Medium1 not blocked8 Working exploit published8
Nov 09Jan 10Mar 10May 10Jul 10Sep 10Nov 10Jan 11
9 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2010-4437 Medium 2011-01-19 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebLogic Server component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 9.0, 9.1, 9.2.4, 10.0.2, 10.3.2, and 10.3.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Servlet Container.
CVE-2010-4435 High 2011-01-19 Not applicable Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Solaris 8, 9, and 10 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability, related to CDE Calendar Manager Service Daemon and RPC. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2011 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from other software vendors that this affects other operating systems, such as HP-UX, or claims from a reliable third party that this is a buffer overflow in rpc.cmsd via long XDR-encoded ASCII strings in RPC call 10.
CVE-2010-4417 High 2011-01-19 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the Services for Beehive component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 2.0.1.0, 2.0.1.1, 2.0.1.2, 2.0.1.2.1, and 2.0.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2011 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable third party coordinator that voice-servlet/prompt-qa/Index.jspf does not properly handle null (%00) bytes in the evaluation parameter that is used in a filename, which allows attackers to create a file with an executable extension and execute arbitrary JSP code.
CVE-2010-3600 High 2011-01-19 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the Client System Analyzer component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7 and 11.2.0.1 and Enterprise Manager Grid Control 10.2.0.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2011 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable third party coordinator that this issue involves an exposed JSP script that accepts XML uploads in conjunction with NULL bytes in an unspecified parameter that allow execution of arbitrary code.
CVE-2010-3599 High 2011-01-19 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Document Capture component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.1.3.4 and 10.1.3.5 allows remote attackers to affect integrity and availability via unknown vectors related to Import Server. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2011 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from the original researcher that remote attackers can overwrite arbitrary files and execute arbitrary code via a full pathname in the first argument to the WriteJPG method in the NCSECWLib ActiveX control.
CVE-2010-3595 High 2011-01-19 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Document Capture component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.1.3.4 and 10.1.3.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Import Server. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2011 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from the original researcher that remote attackers can read arbitrary files via a full pathname in the first argument to the ImportBodyText method in the EasyMail ActiveX control (emsmtp.dll).
CVE-2010-3591 High 2011-01-19 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Document Capture component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.1.3.4 and 10.1.3.5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Internal Operations. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2011 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from the original researcher that remote attackers can overwrite or delete arbitrary files via a full pathname in the second argument to the DownloadSingleMessageToFile method in the EMPOP3Lib ActiveX component (empop3.dll).
CVE-2010-2632 High 2011-01-19 Not applicable Working exploit published Unspecified vulnerability in the FTP Server in Oracle Solaris 8, 9, 10, and 11 Express allows remote attackers to affect availability. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the January 2011 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a reliable researcher that this is an issue in the glob implementation in libc that allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via crafted glob expressions that do not match any pathnames.
CVE-2009-3555 Critical 2009-11-09 Not applicable Exploited The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue.