`CVE-2026-87823`

8.8 High No exploit published

Published 6 days ago. NVD backfills CPE data for days or weeks after publication, and OSV and the exploit indexes lag too. Scope and status here may change.

Description

zstd-jni before 1.5.7-14 performs 32-bit signed bounds checks on three direct-ByteBuffer frame-size native methods, allowing out-of-bounds memory reads via negative or overflowing offsets. Attackers can supply negative offset values near Integer.MIN_VALUE to read unmapped memory, causing JVM termination or extracting arbitrary frame size data from unintended memory locations.

CWE-190 · Integer overflow

Exploitation Status

Proof of concept only

A proof of concept exists, but no reviewed exploit catalogue carries this CVE. Demonstrating a defect and weaponising it are different amounts of work.

CVSS E:P

CISA KEV not listed
CISA Vulnrichment exploitation: poc CISA concluded an exploit has been demonstrated, typically from a vendor advisory, which leaves no artifact to index. Automatable: yes, technical impact: partial.
Indexed PoC none indexed
EPSS 0.43% chance in 30 days

Waratek Defense Posture

No exploit published

In RASP's scope with an upstream fix path, but nobody has published a working exploit. That is a statement about what has been published, not a finding that the defect is unreachable or unimportant.

Protection none
Action unverified patch rule
Review automated upstream-data
Record active

Decided by no-exploit-published : A published working exploit for this candidate, not only a proof of concept, a forecast, or nothing at all

Finding This CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment records no active exploitation, and no reviewed exploit catalogue carries an entry for it. Nobody has published something a stranger can run, so it is not a candidate for a rule ahead of the ones where somebody has; an upstream fix path does exist, so the remediation half of the candidacy still holds. This is a statement about what has been published, not about whether the defect is reachable or serious.

Candidate fix https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/commit/46dcb2a54c8b8f2ce2cad7187a7513f509c533ac : a commit: the change itself

Decided by	`no-exploit-published` : A published working exploit for this candidate, not only a proof of concept, a forecast, or nothing at all
Finding	This CVE is not listed in CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment records no active exploitation, and no reviewed exploit catalogue carries an entry for it. Nobody has published something a stranger can run, so it is not a candidate for a rule ahead of the ones where somebody has; an upstream fix path does exist, so the remediation half of the candidacy still holds. This is a statement about what has been published, not about whether the defect is reachable or serious.
Candidate fix	https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/commit/46dcb2a54c8b8f2ce2cad7187a7513f509c533ac : a commit: the change itself

CVSS

8.8 HIGH v4.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

2 metrics

VRT selects the newest version's highest entry and publishes it as cvssScore, newest rather than largest because scores are not comparable across versions, and highest rather than first because the first entry is frequently a CNA placeholder scoring 0.0 over NVD's own analysis.

Version Score Band Vector Assigner Type

CVSS 4.0 8.8 HIGH CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X disclosure@vulncheck.com Secondary published

CVSS 3.1 8.2 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H disclosure@vulncheck.com Secondary

Version	Score	Band	Vector	Assigner	Type
CVSS 4.0	8.8	HIGH	`CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X`	disclosure@vulncheck.com	Secondary	published
CVSS 3.1	8.2	HIGH	`CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H`	disclosure@vulncheck.com	Secondary

References

URL	Tags
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/commit/46dcb2a54c8b8f2ce2cad7187a7513f509c533ac	commit
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/blob/v1.5.7-13/src/main/java/com/github/luben/zstd/Zstd.java
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/blob/v1.5.7-13/src/main/native/jni_zstd.c
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/commit/d7a1c99322d5e1fc71932e722c0b5bb2fc525d3f
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/releases/tag/v1.5.7-14
https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/security/advisories/GHSA-jfr6-9xqw-2g2q
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/zstd-jni-1.1.1-through-1.5.7-13-out-of-bounds-read-via-direct-bytebuffer-frame-size-methods

URL

Timeline

Published 2026-09-09 Last modified 2026-09-09

Published	2026-09-09	By the CVE Program.
NVD record modified	2026-09-09	NVD's own last-modified date for this record.

Published

2026-09-09

By the CVE Program.

NVD record modified

2026-09-09

NVD's own last-modified date for this record.

Pipeline policy audit (16 of 21 rules evaluated)

16 of 21 rules ran. The rest were never reached, because an earlier stage settled the CVE, a distinct claim from a rule that ran and found nothing.

# Rule Outcome Status Detail

identity: Does this identifier describe a vulnerability at all? first match wins

1 rejected no-match CVE Program withdrawal of this identifier

scope: Is the vulnerability ARMR's to address? first match wins

2 armr-patch-file no-match An ARMR patch file on disk for this CVE

3 armr-secure-rule-file no-match An ARMR security-rule template on disk for this CVE

4 manual-classification no-match A researcher's recorded decision for this specific CVE

5 manual classification no-match Manual classification of this CVE in the legacy dataset

6 non-java-upstream no-match A root cause in non-Java code: an OS kernel, a C library, or a bundled runtime

7 oracle-component no-match The defect being in a component of a tracked product the agent does not reach: JavaFX, the Java SE installer, the native WebLogic proxy plug-in. Oracle gives these no CPE of their own and names them only in the description.

8 osv-maven no-match An OSV.dev record of this CVE affecting a package published to Maven Central

9 cna-maven-package matched Queued for review CNA declares the affected component is a Maven artifact

10 known-cpe-product not-reached An NVD CPE naming a product ARMR tracks

11 cna-cpe-product not-reached A CPE the CNA published naming a tracked product. Oracle publishes these on advisory day, months before NVD.

12 oracle-advisory-family not-reached A tracked product family named in Oracle's own risk matrix. CPE cannot carry a suite name, only a module.

13 non-deployable-product not-reached The only affected product being a sealed appliance image, where Java runs but no -javaagent can be attached

14 unmatched-product not-reached No tracked product matched above, and none present at all

disposition: What do we do about one that is? cumulative: every rule gets a turn

15 patch-hint matched Mitigation candidate References include candidate fix URL (commit tier): https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/commit/46dcb2a54c8b8f2ce2cad7187a7513f509c533ac

16 open-source-maven skipped The affected package being open source on Maven, so the fix can be read

17 poc-derivable skipped An indexed exploit to reverse-engineer, where there is no source to read

18 no-exploit skipped With no fix path, a public exploit, or a CISA record of one

19 secure-rule-match no-match A vulnerability class already blocked by an ARMR security rule

20 below-action-threshold no-match Severity is HIGH — only MEDIUM/LOW are deprioritized

21 no-exploit-published decided it matched No exploit published No working exploit has been published, and an upstream fix path does exist, so the remediation half of the candidacy still holds.

Raw stored JSON document for this CVE ↗ · NVD ↗ · CVE.org ↗