CVE-2026-82441
| Severity | 9.1 Critical CVSS 3.1 |
|---|---|
| Weakness | Improper input validation (CWE-20) |
| Published | 14 Sep 2026 |
Published 2 months ago. NVD often adds the list of affected products days or weeks after a CVE is published, and the other sources we check lag too. The scope and status here may change.
Description
Description
A submitted topology carries two lists of blobstore keys, dependency_jars and dependency_artifacts,
which the client fills in after uploading the corresponding blobs. Nimbus performed no validation of their
contents on the submission path, yet acts on them in two places.
During cleanup of a finished topology, Nimbus deletes the keys named in those lists, and the deletion is
performed as the Nimbus subject, for which the blobstore short-circuits its ACL check. A submitter who
listed a key belonging to another topology, such as its -stormjar.jar, could therefore cause
that blob to be deleted when their own topology was cleaned up.
Separately, on acquiring leadership a Nimbus compares the dependency keys of all active topologies against
the blobstore contents and surrenders leadership if any is missing. A single key that does not exist, on a
single active topology, therefore causes every Nimbus to acquire leadership, surrender it and requeue
indefinitely, leaving the cluster without a leader and unable to schedule, clean up or accept submissions.
Mitigation
Upgrade to 3.1.0, where a submission is refused unless every entry in both lists is a dependency blob key
and exists in the blobstore.
Note that this validates new submissions only; a topology stored by an affected version with an invalid list
is unaffected by the upgrade. An operator whose cluster is failing to retain a leader should inspect the
Nimbus log for the dependency keys reported as missing and remove or resubmit the topology naming them.
Users who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict topology submission to trusted principals.
Credit
This issue was discovered by rzo1 while investigating an unrelated blobstore defect.
CWE-639
Exploitation status
No public exploit
No exploit has been reported in the sources we check.
Exploitation status
- CISA KEV not listed
- VulnCheck KEV not listed
- CISA Vulnrichment exploitation: none
- Indexed PoC none indexed
- EPSS 0.27% chance in 30 days
Waratek protection
Within Waratek scope. In the sources we check, nobody has published exploit code for this CVE or reported it being exploited.
VRT has not found a public code change for this CVE yet.
- Protection none
- Action not pursued
- Review automated Upstream data
- Record active
| Decided by | Nothing to build a rule from yet: no published exploit, no CISA record of exploitation and no source-level change to read |
|---|---|
| Finding | This CVE affects a known product, but nothing published names a fix and nothing published shows an exploit. That is a statement about the evidence, not about the defect — it does not mean the vulnerability is unimportant or unreachable, only that neither of the two things VRT can act on exists. |
References
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://lists.apache.org/thread/qzh245bczoxw4mfnyvrj3dj2crtzdso8 | |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/13/19 |
Timeline
Timeline
| Published | 2026-09-14 | By the CVE Program. |
|---|---|---|
| NVD record modified | 2026-09-14 | NVD's own last-modified date for this record. |