VRT 391,192 CVEs tracked · 15,442 in RASP scope · data as of 16 hours ago

CVE-2026-82441

Unknown No fix identified

Not yet in NVD's feed. The description, CVSS and CWE below come from the CVE Numbering Authority's own record, not from NVD analyst review. NVD's own page for this identifier may not exist yet.

Published yesterday. NVD backfills CPE data for days or weeks after publication, and OSV and the exploit indexes lag too. Scope and status here may change.

Description

Description A submitted topology carries two lists of blobstore keys, dependency_jars and dependency_artifacts, which the client fills in after uploading the corresponding blobs. Nimbus performed no validation of their contents on the submission path, yet acts on them in two places. During cleanup of a finished topology, Nimbus deletes the keys named in those lists, and the deletion is performed as the Nimbus subject, for which the blobstore short-circuits its ACL check. A submitter who listed a key belonging to another topology, such as its -stormjar.jar, could therefore cause that blob to be deleted when their own topology was cleaned up. Separately, on acquiring leadership a Nimbus compares the dependency keys of all active topologies against the blobstore contents and surrenders leadership if any is missing. A single key that does not exist, on a single active topology, therefore causes every Nimbus to acquire leadership, surrender it and requeue indefinitely, leaving the cluster without a leader and unable to schedule, clean up or accept submissions. Mitigation Upgrade to 3.1.0, where a submission is refused unless every entry in both lists is a dependency blob key and exists in the blobstore. Note that this validates new submissions only; a topology stored by an affected version with an invalid list is unaffected by the upgrade. An operator whose cluster is failing to retain a leader should inspect the Nimbus log for the dependency keys reported as missing and remove or resubmit the topology naming them. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should restrict topology submission to trusted principals. Credit This issue was discovered by rzo1 while investigating an unrelated blobstore defect.

CWE-20 · Improper input validationCWE-639

Exploitation Status

No public exploit

Nothing published shows this CVE being exploited, which is not the same as ruling it out.

CVSS E:U

  • CISA KEV not listed
  • CISA Vulnrichment no assessment published
  • Indexed PoC none indexed
  • EPSS not scored

Waratek Defense Posture

No fix identified

In RASP's scope, but nothing published names a fix and nothing published shows an exploit. Neither of the two things VRT can act on exists, which is a claim about the available evidence, not about the vulnerability.

  • Protection none
  • Action not-needed
  • Review automated upstream-data
  • Record active
Decided by no-exploit : With no fix path, a public exploit, or a CISA record of one
Finding Resolved from QUEUED-FOR-REVIEW: this CVE affects a known product, but nothing published names a fix and nothing published shows an exploit. That is a statement about the evidence, not about the defect — it does not mean the vulnerability is unimportant or unreachable, only that neither of the two things VRT can act on exists.

References

URLTags
https://lists.apache.org/thread/qzh245bczoxw4mfnyvrj3dj2crtzdso8 vendor-advisory

Timeline

Published 2026-09-14 Last modified 2026-09-14
Published2026-09-14By the CVE Program.
NVD record modified2026-09-14NVD's own last-modified date for this record.