`CVE-2026-48203` Apache Camel

Affected software	Apache Camel
Severity	9.1 Critical CVSS 3.1
Fixed in	`4.14.8`, `4.18.3`, `4.21.0`
Weakness	Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)
Published	6 Jul 2026
Updated	25 Oct 2026

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Improper Input Validation, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Camel Solr component. The camel-solr producer copies Exchange message headers whose names begin with the SolrParam. prefix into the parameters of the Solr request, and headers whose names begin with the SolrField. prefix into the fields of the indexed Solr document. The prefix constants (SolrConstants.HEADER_PARAM_PREFIX / HEADER_FIELD_PREFIX) were the plain strings SolrParam. / SolrField.. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a solr: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set SolrParam.* headers to inject arbitrary Solr request parameters - including shards or stream.url, which cause the Solr server to issue server-side requests to an attacker-chosen URL (server-side request forgery, for example to an internal service or a cloud metadata endpoint), or qt to reach administrative request handlers - and set SolrField.* headers to inject arbitrary fields into indexed documents. No credentials are required when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set Solr parameters or fields via the raw header prefixes must use CamelSolrParam. / CamelSolrField. instead of SolrParam. / SolrField.. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the SolrParam.* and SolrField.* headers from any untrusted ingress before the solr: producer, and set the required Solr parameters and fields from a trusted source in the route.

CWE-20 · Improper input validationCWE-74

Exploitation status

No public exploit

No exploit has been reported in the sources we check. The 1 repository below are public GitHub repositories with fewer than 5 stars.

CISA KEV not listed
VulnCheck KEV not listed
CISA Vulnrichment exploitation: none
Indexed PoC 1 indexed, none at 5+ stars
EPSS 0.60% chance in 30 days

1 of these are GitHub repositories with fewer than 5 stars. They are listed for reference and don't count toward the exploitation status above.

Index	Artifact	Stars	First seen
GitHub PoC	Reproducer for CVE-2026-48203: Apache Camel camel-solr SolrParam./SolrField. header injection enabling Solr document-field injection and SSRF via the shards parameter (fixed in 4.14.8/4.18.3/4.21.0)		2026-07-17

Index

Artifact

Stars

First seen

GitHub PoC

Reproducer for CVE-2026-48203: Apache Camel camel-solr SolrParam./SolrField. header injection enabling Solr document-field injection and SSRF via the shards parameter (fixed in 4.14.8/4.18.3/4.21.0)

2026-07-17

Waratek protection

No exploit published

Within Waratek scope. In the sources we check, nobody has published exploit code for this CVE or reported it being exploited.

A public code fix exists: apache/camel #23410.

Protection none
Action unverified
Review automated Upstream data
Record active

Decided by	Exploit code for this candidate, published in a reviewed catalogue or a GitHub repository with 5 or more stars, or in use per CISA or VulnCheck; not only a CISA verdict, a forecast, or nothing at all
Finding	This CVE is not listed in CISA KEV or VulnCheck KEV, CISA Vulnrichment records no active exploitation, no reviewed exploit catalogue carries an entry for it, and no GitHub PoC repository for it has 5 or more stars. Nobody has published exploit code worth tracing, so it is not a candidate for a rule ahead of the ones where somebody has; an upstream fix path does exist, so the remediation half of the candidacy still holds. This is a statement about what has been published, not about whether the defect is reachable or serious.

Decided by

Exploit code for this candidate, published in a reviewed catalogue or a GitHub repository with 5 or more stars, or in use per CISA or VulnCheck; not only a CISA verdict, a forecast, or nothing at all

Finding

This CVE is not listed in CISA KEV or VulnCheck KEV, CISA Vulnrichment records no active exploitation, no reviewed exploit catalogue carries an entry for it, and no GitHub PoC repository for it has 5 or more stars. Nobody has published exploit code worth tracing, so it is not a candidate for a rule ahead of the ones where somebody has; an upstream fix path does exist, so the remediation half of the candidacy still holds. This is a statement about what has been published, not about whether the defect is reachable or serious.

Affected software and releases

Maven packages

Affected and fixed versions, from OSV.dev

Package Introduced Fixed Last affected

org.apache.camel:camel-solr 4.0.0 4.14.8 unbounded

org.apache.camel:camel-solr 4.15.0 4.18.3 unbounded

org.apache.camel:camel-solr 4.19.0 4.21.0 unbounded

Package	Introduced	Fixed	Last affected
`org.apache.camel:camel-solr`	4.0.0	`4.14.8`	unbounded
`org.apache.camel:camel-solr`	4.15.0	`4.18.3`	unbounded
`org.apache.camel:camel-solr`	4.19.0	`4.21.0`	unbounded

Products and versions

2 products, 6 version entries

Source	Vendor	Product	Scheme	Affected versions
nvd	apache	camel	generic	≥ 4.0.0 and ＜ 4.14.8 · ≥ 4.15.0 and ＜ 4.18.3 · ≥ 4.19.0 and ＜ 4.21.0
osv	org.apache.camel	camel-solr	generic	≥ 4.0.0 and ＜ 4.14.8 · ≥ 4.15.0 and ＜ 4.18.3 · ≥ 4.19.0 and ＜ 4.21.0

Source

Vendor

Product

Scheme

Affected versions

nvd

apache

camel

generic

≥ 4.0.0 and ＜ 4.14.8 · ≥ 4.15.0 and ＜ 4.18.3 · ≥ 4.19.0 and ＜ 4.21.0

osv

org.apache.camel

camel-solr

generic

≥ 4.0.0 and ＜ 4.14.8 · ≥ 4.15.0 and ＜ 4.18.3 · ≥ 4.19.0 and ＜ 4.21.0

References

URL	Tags
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/23410	WEB
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/23483	WEB
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/23489	WEB
https://github.com/apache/camel/commit/4578a9014a6b7a914cf16baf2c5bf62a7b163a88	WEB
https://github.com/apache/camel/commit/cfc0d51f015b3112eae4ce0968d045f00e95c796	WEB
https://github.com/apache/camel/commit/f79cbe3f8bc3fe1095d8492e9ef321289451d457	WEB
https://github.com/apache/camel	PACKAGE
https://github.com/apache/camel/releases/tag/camel-4.14.8	WEB
https://github.com/apache/camel/releases/tag/camel-4.18.3	WEB
https://github.com/apache/camel/releases/tag/camel-4.21.0	WEB

URL

Timeline

Published	2026-07-06	By the CVE Program.
NVD record modified	2026-10-25	NVD's own last-modified date for this record.

Published

2026-07-06

By the CVE Program.

NVD record modified

2026-10-25

NVD's own last-modified date for this record.

How VRT decided (17 of 24 rules ran)

17 of 24 rules ran. The rest didn't run because an earlier rule had already settled the CVE.

# Rule Outcome Status Detail

identity: Does this identifier describe a vulnerability at all? the first rule that matches decides

1 rejected no match CVE Program withdrawal of this identifier

scope: Is it a vulnerability Waratek protects? the first rule that matches decides

2 armr-patch-file no match An ARMR patch file on disk for this CVE

3 armr-secure-rule-file no match An ARMR security-rule template on disk for this CVE

4 manual-classification no match A researcher's recorded decision for this specific CVE

5 manual classification no match Manual classification of this CVE in the legacy dataset

6 non-java-upstream no match A root cause in non-Java code: an OS kernel, a C library, or a bundled runtime

7 oracle-component no match The defect being in a component of a tracked product the agent does not reach: JavaFX, the Java SE installer, the JInitiator browser plug-in, the native WebLogic proxy plug-in, or a native part of Oracle Application Server or Collaboration Suite (HTTP Server, Web Cache, Internet Directory, mail and calendar servers). Oracle gives these no CPE of their own and names them only in the description.

8 java-client-side no match Oracle's own risk-matrix note saying the CVE is reached only through untrusted code in the Java sandbox (applets, Web Start) or only through a client installation of Java, so a server running its own trusted code is not exposed

9 osv-maven matched In scope Maven packages: org.apache.camel:camel-solr

10 cna-maven-package not reached An affected Maven artifact named by the CNA itself

11 known-cpe-product not reached An NVD CPE naming a product ARMR tracks

12 cna-cpe-product not reached A CPE the CNA published naming a tracked product. Oracle publishes these on advisory day, months before NVD.

13 oracle-advisory-family not reached A tracked product family named in Oracle's own risk matrix. CPE cannot carry a suite name, only a module.

14 cna-named-product not reached A tracked product named in words by the CVE's own CNA, on a record with no CPE yet. Apache and Eclipse publish these on advisory day, before NVD adds CPE data.

15 non-deployable-product not reached The only affected product being a sealed appliance image, where Java runs but no -javaagent can be attached

16 unmatched-product not reached No tracked product matched above, and none present at all

disposition: What do we do about one that is? every rule runs

17 patch-hint no match A reference pointing at the upstream fix: a commit, a PR, a Red Hat bug

18 open-source-maven matched Mitigation candidate Open-source Maven artifact indexed by OSV (Maven packages: org.apache.camel:camel-solr). The source is public, which makes an ARMR patch rule a candidate; nothing here establishes that one can be written.

19 poc-derivable skipped An indexed exploit clearing the evidence bar to reverse-engineer, where there is no source to read

20 no-exploit skipped Nothing to build a rule from yet: no published exploit, no CISA record of exploitation and no source-level change to read

21 secure-rule-match no match A vulnerability class already blocked by an ARMR security rule

22 exploited-no-fix-or-poc skipped Somebody exploiting this CVE (a CISA or VulnCheck KEV listing, or a CISA verdict of active exploitation), with no fix, source code or PoC to build a rule from

23 below-action-threshold no match Severity is CRITICAL — only MEDIUM/LOW are deprioritized

24 no-exploit-published decided it matched No exploit published No exploit code has been published, and an upstream fix path does exist, so the remediation half of the candidacy still holds.

Products the scope rules checked

The products this CVE's record names, and whether VRT tracks each one. The scope rules decided on these.

Vendor Product Tracked CPE Source

apache camel tracked cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* yaml

NVD ↗ · CVE.org ↗