`CVE-2026-0861`

8.4 High Not applicable

Description

Passing too large an alignment to the memalign suite of functions (memalign, posix_memalign, aligned_alloc) in the GNU C Library version 2.30 to 2.42 may result in an integer overflow, which could consequently result in a heap corruption. Note that the attacker must have control over both, the size as well as the alignment arguments of the memalign function to be able to exploit this. The size parameter must be close enough to PTRDIFF_MAX so as to overflow size_t along with the large alignment argument. This limits the malicious inputs for the alignment for memalign to the range [1<<62+ 1, 1<<63] and exactly 1<<63 for posix_memalign and aligned_alloc. Typically the alignment argument passed to such functions is a known constrained quantity (e.g. page size, block size, struct sizes) and is not attacker controlled, because of which this may not be easily exploitable in practice. An application bug could potentially result in the input alignment being too large, e.g. due to a different buffer overflow or integer overflow in the application or its dependent libraries, but that is again an uncommon usage pattern given typical sources of alignments.

CWE-190 · Integer overflow

Exploitation Status

No public exploit

Nothing published shows this CVE being exploited, which is not the same as ruling it out.

CVSS E:U

CISA KEV not listed
CISA Vulnrichment exploitation: none
Indexed PoC none indexed
EPSS 0.39% chance in 30 days

Waratek Defense Posture

Not applicable

Not a Java vulnerability. Outside ARMR's domain entirely.

Protection none
Action not-needed none
Review automated upstream-data
Record active

Decided by non-java-upstream : A root cause in non-Java code: an OS kernel, a C library, or a bundled runtime

Finding Root cause is in an ignored upstream product (The GNU C Library/glibc). Common reasons: not a Java library, vulnerability is in native/C code, or product is outside ARMR's mitigation scope.

Decided by	`non-java-upstream` : A root cause in non-Java code: an OS kernel, a C library, or a bundled runtime
Finding	Root cause is in an ignored upstream product (The GNU C Library/glibc). Common reasons: not a Java library, vulnerability is in native/C code, or product is outside ARMR's mitigation scope.

CVSS

8.4 HIGH v3.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H 1 metric

VRT selects the newest version's highest entry and publishes it as cvssScore, newest rather than largest because scores are not comparable across versions, and highest rather than first because the first entry is frequently a CNA placeholder scoring 0.0 over NVD's own analysis.

Version Score Band Vector Assigner Type

CVSS 3.1 8.4 HIGH CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H CISA-ADP Secondary published

Version	Score	Band	Vector	Assigner	Type
CVSS 3.1	8.4	HIGH	`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H`	CISA-ADP	Secondary	published

Affected Software & Releases

🏛️ Oracle CPU Advisories & Products

Advisory	Type	Quarter	Products Oracle named in risk matrix
Oracle Critical Patch Update July 2026 ↗	CPU	2026-Q3	Oracle Communications / Configuration (glibc) (25.2.200)
Oracle Critical Patch Update April 2026 ↗	CPU	2026-Q2	Oracle Communications / Configuration (glibc) (25.1.200, 25.2.200) Oracle Communications / Mediation Engine (glibc) (6.1.0.0.0) Oracle Communications / Third Party (glibc) (7.7.0, 7.8.0, 8.0.0)

Advisory

Type

Quarter

Products Oracle named in risk matrix

Oracle Critical Patch Update July 2026 ↗

CPU

2026-Q3

Oracle Communications / Configuration (glibc) (25.2.200)

Oracle Critical Patch Update April 2026 ↗

CPU

2026-Q2

Oracle Communications / Configuration (glibc) (25.1.200, 25.2.200)
Oracle Communications / Mediation Engine (glibc) (6.1.0.0.0)
Oracle Communications / Third Party (glibc) (7.7.0, 7.8.0, 8.0.0)

Indexed Oracle Components & Versions

Family	Component	Oracle's version cell (verbatim)	Indexed as
Oracle Communications	Configuration (glibc)	25.1.200, 25.2.200	25.1.200 · 25.2.200
Oracle Communications	Mediation Engine (glibc)	6.1.0.0.0	6.1.0.0.0
Oracle Communications	Third Party (glibc)	7.7.0, 7.8.0, 8.0.0	7.7.0 · 7.8.0 · 8.0.0

Family

Component

Oracle's version cell (verbatim)

Indexed as

Oracle Communications

Configuration (glibc)

25.1.200, 25.2.200

25.1.200 · 25.2.200

Oracle Communications

Mediation Engine (glibc)

6.1.0.0.0

Oracle Communications

Third Party (glibc)

7.7.0, 7.8.0, 8.0.0

7.7.0 · 7.8.0 · 8.0.0

🖥️ Product CPEs & Version Ranges

1 product(s) over 1 version claims (uncapped)

Source	Vendor	Product	Scheme	Affected Versions
nvd	gnu	glibc	generic	≥ 2.30 and ≤ 2.42

Source

Vendor

Product

Scheme

Affected Versions

nvd

gnu

glibc

generic

≥ 2.30 and ≤ 2.42

References

URL	Tags
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33796	Exploit
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob_plain;f=advisories/GLIBC-SA-2026-0001	Patch
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/01/16/5	Mailing List, Patch

URL

Timeline

Published 2026-01-14 Last modified 2026-06-17

Published	2026-01-14	By the CVE Program.
NVD record modified	2026-06-17	NVD's own last-modified date for this record.

Published

2026-01-14

By the CVE Program.

NVD record modified

2026-06-17

NVD's own last-modified date for this record.

Pipeline policy audit (6 of 21 rules evaluated)

6 of 21 rules ran. The rest were never reached, because an earlier stage settled the CVE, a distinct claim from a rule that ran and found nothing.

# Rule Outcome Status Detail

identity: Does this identifier describe a vulnerability at all? first match wins

1 rejected no-match CVE Program withdrawal of this identifier

scope: Is the vulnerability ARMR's to address? first match wins

2 armr-patch-file no-match An ARMR patch file on disk for this CVE

3 armr-secure-rule-file no-match An ARMR security-rule template on disk for this CVE

4 manual-classification no-match A researcher's recorded decision for this specific CVE

5 manual classification no-match Manual classification of this CVE in the legacy dataset

6 non-java-upstream decided it matched Not applicable CNA-declared affected products are on the ignored list: The GNU C Library/glibc

7 oracle-component not-reached The defect being in a component of a tracked product the agent does not reach: JavaFX, the Java SE installer, the native WebLogic proxy plug-in. Oracle gives these no CPE of their own and names them only in the description.

8 osv-maven not-reached An OSV.dev record of this CVE affecting a package published to Maven Central

9 cna-maven-package not-reached An affected Maven artifact named by the CNA itself

10 known-cpe-product not-reached An NVD CPE naming a product ARMR tracks

11 cna-cpe-product not-reached A CPE the CNA published naming a tracked product. Oracle publishes these on advisory day, months before NVD.

12 oracle-advisory-family not-reached A tracked product family named in Oracle's own risk matrix. CPE cannot carry a suite name, only a module.

13 non-deployable-product not-reached The only affected product being a sealed appliance image, where Java runs but no -javaagent can be attached

14 unmatched-product not-reached No tracked product matched above, and none present at all

disposition: What do we do about one that is? cumulative: every rule gets a turn

15 patch-hint not-reached A reference pointing at the upstream fix: a commit, a PR, a Red Hat bug

16 open-source-maven not-reached The affected package being open source on Maven, so the fix can be read

17 poc-derivable not-reached An indexed exploit to reverse-engineer, where there is no source to read

18 no-exploit not-reached With no fix path, a public exploit, or a CISA record of one

19 secure-rule-match not-reached A vulnerability class already blocked by an ARMR security rule

20 below-action-threshold not-reached Medium or Low severity, no KEV listing, no PoC clearing the evidence bar, no CISA verdict, no Oracle advisory

21 no-exploit-published not-reached A published working exploit for this candidate, not only a proof of concept, a forecast, or nothing at all

What the scope rules read

The products the record named, and whether known-products.yaml tracks them. This is the evidence the scope stage decided on.

Vendor Product Tracked CPE Source

The GNU C Library glibc not tracked

Raw stored JSON document for this CVE ↗ · NVD ↗ · CVE.org ↗