| identity: Does this identifier describe a vulnerability at all? the first rule that matches decides |
|---|
| 1 |
rejected |
no match |
|
CVE Program withdrawal of this identifier |
| scope: Is it a vulnerability Waratek protects? the first rule that matches decides |
|---|
| 2 |
armr-patch-file |
no match |
|
An ARMR patch file on disk for this CVE |
| 3 |
armr-secure-rule-file |
no match |
|
An ARMR security-rule template on disk for this CVE |
| 4 |
manual-classification |
no match |
|
A researcher's recorded decision for this specific CVE |
| 5 |
manual classification |
no match |
|
Manual classification of this CVE in the legacy dataset |
| 6 |
non-java-upstream |
no match |
|
A root cause in non-Java code: an OS kernel, a C library, or a bundled runtime |
| 7 |
oracle-component |
no match |
|
The defect being in a component of a tracked product the agent does not reach: JavaFX, the Java SE installer, the JInitiator browser plug-in, the native WebLogic proxy plug-in, or a native part of Oracle Application Server or Collaboration Suite (HTTP Server, Web Cache, Internet Directory, mail and calendar servers). Oracle gives these no CPE of their own and names them only in the description. |
| 8 |
java-client-side |
no match |
|
Oracle's own risk-matrix note saying the CVE is reached only through untrusted code in the Java sandbox (applets, Web Start) or only through a client installation of Java, so a server running its own trusted code is not exposed |
| 9 |
osv-maven |
no match |
|
An OSV.dev record of this CVE affecting a package published to Maven Central. When every such package is one business applications do not use (Minecraft mods and launchers, Fastjson) and no tracked product is named by CPE, it settles the CVE as Outside Waratek scope instead |
| 10 |
cna-maven-package |
no match |
|
An affected Maven artifact named by the CNA itself |
| 11 |
known-cpe-product |
no match |
|
An NVD CPE naming a product ARMR tracks |
| 12 |
cna-cpe-product |
no match |
|
A CPE the CNA published naming a tracked product. Oracle publishes these on advisory day, months before NVD. |
| 13 |
oracle-advisory-family |
no match |
|
A tracked product family named in Oracle's own risk matrix. CPE cannot carry a suite name, only a module. |
| 14 |
cna-named-product |
no match |
|
A tracked product named in words by the CVE's own CNA, on a record with no CPE yet. Apache and Eclipse publish these on advisory day, before NVD adds CPE data. |
| 15 |
non-deployable-product decided it |
matched |
Outside Waratek scope |
Named products cannot host a Java agent: netapp/oncommand_api_services, netapp/service_level_manager |
| 16 |
unmatched-product |
not reached |
|
No tracked product matched above, and none present at all |
| disposition: What do we do about one that is? every rule runs |
|---|
| 17 |
patch-hint |
not reached |
|
A reference pointing at the upstream fix: a commit, a PR, a Red Hat bug |
| 18 |
open-source-maven |
not reached |
|
The affected package being open source on Maven, so the fix can be read |
| 19 |
poc-derivable |
not reached |
|
An indexed exploit clearing the evidence bar to reverse-engineer, where there is no source to read |
| 20 |
no-exploit |
not reached |
|
Nothing to build a rule from yet: no published exploit, no CISA record of exploitation and no source-level change to read |
| 21 |
secure-rule-match |
not reached |
|
A vulnerability class already blocked by an ARMR security rule |
| 22 |
exploited-no-fix-or-poc |
not reached |
|
Somebody exploiting this CVE (a CISA or VulnCheck KEV listing, or a CISA verdict of active exploitation), with no fix, source code or PoC to build a rule from |
| 23 |
below-action-threshold |
not reached |
|
Medium or Low severity, no CISA or VulnCheck KEV listing, no PoC clearing the evidence bar, no CISA verdict, no Oracle advisory |
| 24 |
no-exploit-published |
not reached |
|
Exploit code for this candidate, published in a reviewed catalogue or a GitHub repository with 5 or more stars, or in use per CISA or VulnCheck; not only a CISA verdict, a forecast, or nothing at all |
