High Mcafee CVEs
14 CVEs, 5 protected by Waratek
Overview 14 matches · 5 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
5
35.7%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
7.1%
No exploit published
8
57.1%
blocked by ARMR today
5
35.7%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
64.3%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
3
21.4%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
11
78.6%
split by
peak 3 / year
20033
No exploit published3
High3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20041
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20050
20060
20070
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20131
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
20140
20150
20161
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20171
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
20180
20192
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
High2
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked1
No public exploit2
20203
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
High3
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit1
20211
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20220
20231
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20032005200720092011201320152017201920212023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-5444 | High | 2023-11-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ePolicy Orchestrator prior to 5.10.0 CP1 Update 2 allows a remote low privilege user to successfully add a new user with administrator privileges to the ePO server. This impacts the dashboard area of the user interface. To exploit this the attacker must change the HTTP payload post submission, prior to it reaching the ePO server. |
| CVE-2021-30639 | High | 2021-07-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Apache Tomcat allows an attacker to remotely trigger a denial of service. An error introduced as part of a change to improve error handling during non-blocking I/O meant that the error flag associated with the Request object was not reset between requests. This meant that once a non-blocking I/O error occurred, all future requests handled by that request object would fail. Users were able to trigger non-blocking I/O errors, e.g. by dropping a connection, thereby creating the possibility of triggering a DoS. Applications that do not use non-blocking I/O are not exposed to this vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat 10.0.3 to 10.0.4; 9.0.44; 8.5.64. |
| CVE-2020-13935 | High | 2020-07-14 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service. |
| CVE-2020-9484 | High | 2020-05-20 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | When using Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M4, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.34, 8.5.0 to 8.5.54 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.103 if a) an attacker is able to control the contents and name of a file on the server; and b) the server is configured to use the PersistenceManager with a FileStore; and c) the PersistenceManager is configured with sessionAttributeValueClassNameFilter="null" (the default unless a SecurityManager is used) or a sufficiently lax filter to allow the attacker provided object to be deserialized; and d) the attacker knows the relative file path from the storage location used by FileStore to the file the attacker has control over; then, using a specifically crafted request, the attacker will be able to trigger remote code execution via deserialization of the file under their control. Note that all of conditions a) to d) must be true for the attack to succeed. |
| CVE-2020-2604 | High | 2020-01-15 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded product of Oracle Java SE (component: Serialization). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u241, 8u231, 11.0.5 and 13.0.1; Java SE Embedded: 8u231. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets (in Java SE 8), that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability can also be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2019-2602 | High | 2019-04-23 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Java SE, Java SE Embedded component of Oracle Java SE (subcomponent: Libraries). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u211, 8u202, 11.0.2 and 12; Java SE Embedded: 8u201. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of Java SE, Java SE Embedded. Note: This vulnerability can only be exploited by supplying data to APIs in the specified Component without using Untrusted Java Web Start applications or Untrusted Java applets, such as through a web service. CVSS 3.0 Base Score 7.5 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H). |
| CVE-2019-3604 | High | 2019-02-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in McAfee ePO (legacy) Cloud allows unauthenticated users to perform unintended ePO actions using an authenticated user's session via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2017-3980 | High | 2017-05-18 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A directory traversal vulnerability in the ePO Extension in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 5.9.0, 5.3.2, and 5.1.3 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute a command of their choice via an authenticated ePO session. |
| CVE-2015-8765 | High | 2016-01-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Intel McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 4.6.9 and earlier, 5.0.x, 5.1.x before 5.1.3 Hotfix 1106041, and 5.3.x before 5.3.1 Hotfix 1106041 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. |
| CVE-2013-0140 | High | 2013-05-01 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | SQL injection vulnerability in the Agent-Handler component in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) before 4.5.7 and 4.6.x before 4.6.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted request over the Agent-Server communication channel. |
| CVE-2004-0038 | High | 2004-06-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 2.5.1 Patch 13 and 3.0 SP2a Patch 3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via certain HTTP POST requests to the spipe/file handler on ePO TCP port 81. |
| CVE-2003-0616 | High | 2003-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Format string vulnerability in ePO service for McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 2.0, 2.5, and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a POST request with format strings in the computerlist parameter, which are used when logging a failed name resolution. |
| CVE-2003-0148 | High | 2003-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The default installation of MSDE via McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 2.0 through 3.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a series of steps that (1) obtain the database administrator username and encrypted password in a configuration file from the ePO server using a certain request, (2) crack the password due to weak cryptography, and (3) use the password to pass commands through xp_cmdshell. |
| CVE-2002-0690 | High | 2003-04-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Format string vulnerability in McAfee Security ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an HTTP GET request with a URI containing format strings. |