WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Vendor cisco✕
Overview 4 matches · 3 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC
4matches 3CISA KEV75.0% 3public PoC75.0%
Protected by Waratek 4 100.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 0 0.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 2 50.0% High 1 25.0% Medium 1 25.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 4 100.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 0 0.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 4 100.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 0 0.0%
split by peak 2 / quarter
Protected by Waratek: 4 Medium: 1High: 1Critical: 2 blocked by ARMR today: 4 Exploited: 4
Q3 171 Protected by Waratek1 High1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 Q4 170 Q1 180 Q2 180 Q3 180 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 190 Q3 190 Q4 190 Q1 200 Q2 200 Q3 200 Q4 200 Q1 210 Q2 210 Q3 210 Q4 212 Protected by Waratek2 Critical1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today2 Exploited2 Q1 220 Q2 221 Protected by Waratek1 Critical1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1
Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22
4 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2022-22965 Critical 2022-04-01 Protected by Waratek Exploited A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it.
CVE-2021-44832 Medium 2021-12-28 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-beta7 through 2.17.0 (excluding security fix releases 2.3.2 and 2.12.4) are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack when a configuration uses a JDBC Appender with a JNDI LDAP data source URI when an attacker has control of the target LDAP server. This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI data source names to the java protocol in Log4j2 versions 2.17.1, 2.12.4, and 2.3.2.
CVE-2021-44228 Critical 2021-12-10 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects.
CVE-2017-9805 High 2017-09-15 Protected by Waratek Exploited The REST Plugin in Apache Struts 2.1.1 through 2.3.x before 2.3.34 and 2.5.x before 2.5.13 uses an XStreamHandler with an instance of XStream for deserialization without any type filtering, which can lead to Remote Code Execution when deserializing XML payloads.