Overview 32 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 4 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 13 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
32matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
4exploited12.5%
1CISA KEV3.1%
13public PoC40.6%
3EPSS ≥ 0.59.4%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
32
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
32
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 6 / year
20011
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20020
20030
20042
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20050
20060
20070
20080
20092
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20103
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit1
20113
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20120
20132
Not applicable2
Medium1
Low1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20140
20151
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20161
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20171
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20180
20196
Not applicable6
Critical1
High4
Medium1
not blocked6
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit4
20202
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
20210
20221
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20231
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20240
20251
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20265
Not applicable5
High5
not blocked5
Exploited1
No public exploit4
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-63091 | High | 2026-07-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD before 1.3.9c and 1.3.10rc3 contains a signed integer overflow vulnerability in the mod_sftp module's SCP size-record parser that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to bypass ASLR by sending a crafted file size value of UINT64_MAX, which results in a negative off_t value. Attackers can exploit the subsequent conversion to uint32_t, causing an approximately 4 GB requested read length and forcing the server to read beyond the end of the SSH channel data and write overread process memory into the uploaded file. In tested configurations, the disclosed data contains libc, libcrypto, and PIE pointers sufficient to derive their randomized base addresses, thereby bypassing ASLR and enabling reliable exploitation of memory corruption vulnerabilities in the same process. |
| CVE-2026-63090 | High | 2026-07-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD before 1.3.9c and 1.3.10rc3 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the mod_sftp module that allows authenticated low-privilege attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by sending crafted SFTP packet fragments exceeding the 16 KB reassembly buffer in the fxp.c component. Attackers can supply oversized fragments to trigger an incorrectly conditioned reallocation, corrupt pool freelist metadata, overwrite the root_fs BSS global pointer to reference a fake filesystem struct, and redirect pr_fsio_stat() to system() via a crafted RENAME request. |
| CVE-2026-53994 | High | 2026-07-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD mod_sftp contains a heap-based buffer overflow reachable by an authenticated SFTP user. The fxp_packet_read() function accepts the attacker-supplied 32-bit big-endian SFTP packet length without a minimum sanity check. A value of 0 causes an unsigned subtraction elsewhere in the read path to underflow to approximately 4 GB. That oversized request reaches the core memory allocator, where the rounded size is computed in size_t but passed to new_block() as a 32-bit int; the low 32 bits of 0x100000000 are 0, so new_block() returns a small (~512-byte) block while the caller is told it received ~4 GB. The subsequent fill loop then streams attacker-controlled bytes past the end of the 544-byte allocation, producing an attacker-controlled heap buffer overflow. An authenticated user can crash the per-connection ProFTPD session child on demand with a single malformed SFTP packet (packet_len=0 followed by a body greater than approximately 544 bytes), producing reliable authenticated remote denial of service. Depending on heap layout and adjacent allocations, heap metadata corruption and further consequences beyond denial of service may be possible, though only denial of service is demonstrated by the supplied proof of concept. |
| CVE-2026-35025 | High | 2026-06-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD through 1.3.9b and 1.3.10rc2 contains an access control bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated FTP users to circumvent Directory ACL restrictions by prefixing paths with /proc/self/root in the RNFR command handler. Attackers can exploit the unresolved symlink components in dir_canonical_path() to cause dir_check() to perform lexical path comparisons that match no configured Directory block, enabling rename operations on files in DenyAll-protected directories and subsequent retrieval of those files. Mitigation: Sessions configured with DefaultRoot (chroot) are not affected, as chroot changes the directory to which /proc/self/root resolves. |
| CVE-2026-42167 | High | 2026-04-28 | Not applicable | Exploited | mod_sql in ProFTPD before 1.3.9a allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a username, in scenarios where there is logging of USER requests with an expansion such as %U, and the SQL backend allows commands (e.g., COPY TO PROGRAM). |
| CVE-2010-20103 | Critical | 2025-08-20 | Not applicable | Exploited | A malicious backdoor was embedded in the official ProFTPD 1.3.3c source tarball distributed between November 28 and December 2, 2010. The backdoor implements a hidden FTP command trigger that, when invoked, causes the server to execute arbitrary shell commands with root privileges. This allows remote, unauthenticated attackers to run any OS command on the FTP server host. |
| CVE-2023-51713 | High | 2023-12-22 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | make_ftp_cmd in main.c in ProFTPD before 1.3.8a has a one-byte out-of-bounds read, and daemon crash, because of mishandling of quote/backslash semantics. |
| CVE-2021-46854 | High | 2022-11-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | mod_radius in ProFTPD before 1.3.7c allows memory disclosure to RADIUS servers because it copies blocks of 16 characters. |
| CVE-2020-9273 | High | 2020-02-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | In ProFTPD 1.3.7, it is possible to corrupt the memory pool by interrupting the data transfer channel. This triggers a use-after-free in alloc_pool in pool.c, and possible remote code execution. |
| CVE-2020-9272 | High | 2020-02-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD 1.3.7 has an out-of-bounds (OOB) read vulnerability in mod_cap via the cap_text.c cap_to_text function. |
| CVE-2019-19269 | Medium | 2019-11-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. A dereference of a NULL pointer may occur. This pointer is returned by the OpenSSL sk_X509_REVOKED_value() function when encountering an empty CRL installed by a system administrator. The dereference occurs when validating the certificate of a client connecting to the server in a TLS client/server mutual-authentication setup. |
| CVE-2019-19272 | High | 2019-11-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. Direct dereference of a NULL pointer (a variable initialized to NULL) leads to a crash when validating the certificate of a client connecting to the server in a TLS client/server mutual-authentication setup. |
| CVE-2019-19271 | High | 2019-11-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD before 1.3.6. A wrong iteration variable, used when checking a client certificate against CRL entries (installed by a system administrator), can cause some CRL entries to be ignored, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server. |
| CVE-2019-19270 | High | 2019-11-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. Failure to check for the appropriate field of a CRL entry (checking twice for subject, rather than once for subject and once for issuer) prevents some valid CRLs from being taken into account, and can allow clients whose certificates have been revoked to proceed with a connection to the server. |
| CVE-2019-18217 | High | 2019-10-21 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | ProFTPD before 1.3.6b and 1.3.7rc before 1.3.7rc2 allows remote unauthenticated denial-of-service due to incorrect handling of overly long commands because main.c in a child process enters an infinite loop. |
| CVE-2019-12815 | Critical | 2019-07-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | An arbitrary file copy vulnerability in mod_copy in ProFTPD up to 1.3.5b allows for remote code execution and information disclosure without authentication, a related issue to CVE-2015-3306. |
| CVE-2017-7418 | Medium | 2017-04-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD before 1.3.5e and 1.3.6 before 1.3.6rc5 controls whether the home directory of a user could contain a symbolic link through the AllowChrootSymlinks configuration option, but checks only the last path component when enforcing AllowChrootSymlinks. Attackers with local access could bypass the AllowChrootSymlinks control by replacing a path component (other than the last one) with a symbolic link. The threat model includes an attacker who is not granted full filesystem access by a hosting provider, but can reconfigure the home directory of an FTP user. |
| CVE-2016-3125 | High | 2016-04-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.5b and 1.3.6 before 1.3.6rc2 does not properly handle the TLSDHParamFile directive, which might cause a weaker than intended Diffie-Hellman (DH) key to be used and consequently allow attackers to have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2015-3306 | Critical | 2015-05-18 | Not applicable | Exploited | The mod_copy module in ProFTPD 1.3.5 allows remote attackers to read and write to arbitrary files via the site cpfr and site cpto commands. |
| CVE-2013-4359 | Medium | 2013-09-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Integer overflow in kbdint.c in mod_sftp in ProFTPD 1.3.4d and 1.3.5r3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large response count value in an authentication request, which triggers a large memory allocation. |
| CVE-2012-6095 | Low | 2013-01-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD before 1.3.5rc1, when using the UserOwner directive, allows local users to modify the ownership of arbitrary files via a race condition and a symlink attack on the (1) MKD or (2) XMKD commands. |
| CVE-2011-4130 | High | 2011-12-06 | Not applicable | Exploited | Use-after-free vulnerability in the Response API in ProFTPD before 1.3.3g allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving an error that occurs after an FTP data transfer. |
| CVE-2011-1137 | Medium | 2011-03-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Integer overflow in the mod_sftp (aka SFTP) module in ProFTPD 1.3.3d and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption leading to OOM kill) via a malformed SSH message. |
| CVE-2010-4652 | Medium | 2011-02-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in the sql_prepare_where function (contrib/mod_sql.c) in ProFTPD before 1.3.3d, when mod_sql is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted username containing substitution tags, which are not properly handled during construction of an SQL query. |
| CVE-2010-4221 | High | 2010-11-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the pr_netio_telnet_gets function in netio.c in ProFTPD before 1.3.3c allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving a TELNET IAC escape character to a (1) FTP or (2) FTPS server. |
| CVE-2010-3867 | High | 2010-11-09 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the mod_site_misc module in ProFTPD before 1.3.3c allow remote authenticated users to create directories, delete directories, create symlinks, and modify file timestamps via directory traversal sequences in a (1) SITE MKDIR, (2) SITE RMDIR, (3) SITE SYMLINK, or (4) SITE UTIME command. |
| CVE-2008-7265 | Medium | 2010-11-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The pr_data_xfer function in ProFTPD before 1.3.2rc3 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via an ABOR command during a data transfer. |
| CVE-2009-3639 | Medium | 2009-10-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the dNSNameRequired TLS option is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 client certificate, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended client-hostname restrictions via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. |
| CVE-2009-0543 | Medium | 2009-02-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | ProFTPD Server 1.3.1, with NLS support enabled, allows remote attackers to bypass SQL injection protection mechanisms via invalid, encoded multibyte characters, which are not properly handled in (1) mod_sql_mysql and (2) mod_sql_postgres. |
| CVE-2004-0346 | High | 2004-11-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Off-by-one buffer overflow in _xlate_ascii_write() in ProFTPD 1.2.7 through 1.2.9rc2p allows local users to gain privileges via a 1024 byte RETR command. |
| CVE-2004-1602 | Medium | 2004-10-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | ProFTPD 1.2.x, including 1.2.8 and 1.2.10, responds in a different amount of time when a given username exists, which allows remote attackers to identify valid usernames by timing the server response. |
| CVE-2001-0136 | Medium | 2001-03-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Memory leak in ProFTPd 1.2.0rc2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a series of USER commands, and possibly SIZE commands if the server has been improperly installed. |