WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Vendor sudo project✕
Overview 18 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 7 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
18matches 0in Waratek scope0.0% 0protected0.0% 2exploited11.1% 1CISA KEV5.6% 7public PoC38.9% 3EPSS ≥ 0.516.7%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 2 11.1% Not applicable 16 88.9% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 18 100.0% Medium 0 0.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 18 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 2 11.1% Working exploit published 5 27.8% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 11 61.1%
split by peak 4 / year
Not applicable: 16Outside Waratek scope: 2 High: 18 not blocked: 18 No public exploit: 11Working exploit published: 5Exploited: 2
20021 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20030 20040 20050 20060 20070 20080 20090 20100 20110 20120 20130 20140 20151 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20160 20172 Not applicable2 High2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 20181 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20193 Not applicable3 High3 not blocked3 Working exploit published1 No public exploit2 20201 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20212 Outside Waratek scope2 High2 not blocked2 Exploited1 No public exploit1 20221 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20234 Not applicable4 High4 not blocked4 Exploited1 No public exploit3 20240 20251 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 20261 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
2002200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
18 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2026-35535 High 2026-04-03 Not applicable No public exploit In Sudo through 1.9.17p2 before 3e474c2, a failure of a setuid, setgid, or setgroups call, during a privilege drop before running the mailer, is not a fatal error and can lead to privilege escalation.
CVE-2025-32462 High 2025-06-30 Not applicable Working exploit published Sudo before 1.9.17p1, when used with a sudoers file that specifies a host that is neither the current host nor ALL, allows listed users to execute commands on unintended machines.
CVE-2023-7090 High 2023-12-23 Not applicable No public exploit A flaw was found in sudo in the handling of ipa_hostname, where ipa_hostname from /etc/sssd/sssd.conf was not propagated in sudo. Therefore, it leads to privilege mismanagement vulnerability in applications, where client hosts retain privileges even after retracting them.
CVE-2023-42465 High 2023-12-22 Not applicable No public exploit Sudo before 1.9.15 might allow row hammer attacks (for authentication bypass or privilege escalation) because application logic sometimes is based on not equaling an error value (instead of equaling a success value), and because the values do not resist flips of a single bit.
CVE-2023-27320 High 2023-02-28 Not applicable No public exploit Sudo before 1.9.13p2 has a double free in the per-command chroot feature.
CVE-2023-22809 High 2023-01-18 Not applicable Exploited In Sudo before 1.9.12p2, the sudoedit (aka -e) feature mishandles extra arguments passed in the user-provided environment variables (SUDO_EDITOR, VISUAL, and EDITOR), allowing a local attacker to append arbitrary entries to the list of files to process. This can lead to privilege escalation. Affected versions are 1.8.0 through 1.9.12.p1. The problem exists because a user-specified editor may contain a "--" argument that defeats a protection mechanism, e.g., an EDITOR='vim -- /path/to/extra/file' value.
CVE-2022-43995 High 2022-11-02 Not applicable No public exploit Sudo 1.8.0 through 1.9.12, with the crypt() password backend, contains a plugins/sudoers/auth/passwd.c array-out-of-bounds error that can result in a heap-based buffer over-read. This can be triggered by arbitrary local users with access to Sudo by entering a password of seven characters or fewer. The impact could vary depending on the system libraries, compiler, and processor architecture.
CVE-2021-3156 High 2021-01-26 Outside Waratek scope Exploited Sudo before 1.9.5p2 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow, which allows privilege escalation to root via "sudoedit -s" and a command-line argument that ends with a single backslash character.
CVE-2021-23240 High 2021-01-12 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit selinux_edit_copy_tfiles in sudoedit in Sudo before 1.9.5 allows a local unprivileged user to gain file ownership and escalate privileges by replacing a temporary file with a symlink to an arbitrary file target. This affects SELinux RBAC support in permissive mode. Machines without SELinux are not vulnerable.
CVE-2019-18634 High 2020-01-29 Not applicable Working exploit published In Sudo before 1.8.26, if pwfeedback is enabled in /etc/sudoers, users can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow in the privileged sudo process. (pwfeedback is a default setting in Linux Mint and elementary OS; however, it is NOT the default for upstream and many other packages, and would exist only if enabled by an administrator.) The attacker needs to deliver a long string to the stdin of getln() in tgetpass.c.
CVE-2019-18684 High 2019-11-04 Not applicable No public exploit Sudo through 1.8.29 allows local users to escalate to root if they have write access to file descriptor 3 of the sudo process. This occurs because of a race condition between determining a uid, and the setresuid and openat system calls. The attacker can write "ALL ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL" to /proc/#####/fd/3 at a time when Sudo is prompting for a password. NOTE: This has been disputed due to the way Linux /proc works. It has been argued that writing to /proc/#####/fd/3 would only be viable if you had permission to write to /etc/sudoers. Even with write permission to /proc/#####/fd/3, it would not help you write to /etc/sudoers
CVE-2005-4890 High 2019-11-04 Not applicable No public exploit There is a possible tty hijacking in shadow 4.x before 4.1.5 and sudo 1.x before 1.7.4 via "su - user -c program". The user session can be escaped to the parent session by using the TIOCSTI ioctl to push characters into the input buffer to be read by the next process.
CVE-2019-14287 High 2019-10-17 Not applicable Working exploit published In Sudo before 1.8.28, an attacker with access to a Runas ALL sudoer account can bypass certain policy blacklists and session PAM modules, and can cause incorrect logging, by invoking sudo with a crafted user ID. For example, this allows bypass of !root configuration, and USER= logging, for a "sudo -u \#$((0xffffffff))" command.
CVE-2016-7076 High 2018-05-29 Not applicable No public exploit sudo before version 1.8.18p1 is vulnerable to a bypass in the sudo noexec restriction if application run via sudo executed wordexp() C library function with a user supplied argument. A local user permitted to run such application via sudo with noexec restriction could possibly use this flaw to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges.
CVE-2015-8239 High 2017-10-10 Not applicable No public exploit The SHA-2 digest support in the sudoers plugin in sudo after 1.8.7 allows local users with write permissions to parts of the called command to replace them before it is executed.
CVE-2017-1000368 High 2017-06-05 Not applicable No public exploit Todd Miller's sudo version 1.8.20p1 and earlier is vulnerable to an input validation (embedded newlines) in the get_process_ttyname() function resulting in information disclosure and command execution.
CVE-2015-5602 High 2015-11-17 Not applicable Working exploit published sudoedit in Sudo before 1.8.15 allows local users to gain privileges via a symlink attack on a file whose full path is defined using multiple wildcards in /etc/sudoers, as demonstrated by "/home/*/*/file.txt."
CVE-2002-0184 High 2002-05-16 Not applicable Working exploit published Sudo before 1.6.6 contains an off-by-one error that can result in a heap-based buffer overflow that may allow local users to gain root privileges via special characters in the -p (prompt) argument, which are not properly expanded.