Overview 7 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
7matches
1in Waratek scope14.3%
1protected14.3%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
2public PoC28.6%
1EPSS ≥ 0.514.3%
Protected by Waratek
1
14.3%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
6
85.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
14.3%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
6
85.7%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
1
14.3%
Proof of concept only
1
14.3%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
5
71.4%
split by
peak 3 / year
20161
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20171
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20183
Not applicable3
Critical3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
20190
20200
20211
Protected by Waratek1
Critical1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
20220
20231
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20162017201820192020202120222023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-1174 | Critical | 2023-05-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | This vulnerability exposes a network port in minikube running on macOS with Docker driver that could enable unexpected remote access to the minikube container. |
| CVE-2020-8570 | Critical | 2021-01-21 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Kubernetes Java client libraries in version 10.0.0 and versions prior to 9.0.1 allow writes to paths outside of the current directory when copying multiple files from a remote pod which sends a maliciously crafted archive. This can potentially overwrite any files on the system of the process executing the client code. |
| CVE-2018-1002105 | Critical | 2018-12-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | In all Kubernetes versions prior to v1.10.11, v1.11.5, and v1.12.3, incorrect handling of error responses to proxied upgrade requests in the kube-apiserver allowed specially crafted requests to establish a connection through the Kubernetes API server to backend servers, then send arbitrary requests over the same connection directly to the backend, authenticated with the Kubernetes API server's TLS credentials used to establish the backend connection. |
| CVE-2018-1002101 | Critical | 2018-12-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Kubernetes versions 1.9.0-1.9.9, 1.10.0-1.10.5, and 1.11.0-1.11.1, user input was handled insecurely while setting up volume mounts on Windows nodes, which could lead to command line argument injection. |
| CVE-2017-1002101 | Critical | 2018-03-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | In Kubernetes versions 1.3.x, 1.4.x, 1.5.x, 1.6.x and prior to versions 1.7.14, 1.8.9 and 1.9.4 containers using subpath volume mounts with any volume type (including non-privileged pods, subject to file permissions) can access files/directories outside of the volume, including the host's filesystem. |
| CVE-2017-1000056 | Critical | 2017-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Kubernetes version 1.5.0-1.5.4 is vulnerable to a privilege escalation in the PodSecurityPolicy admission plugin resulting in the ability to make use of any existing PodSecurityPolicy object. |
| CVE-2016-1906 | Critical | 2016-02-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Openshift allows remote attackers to gain privileges by updating a build configuration that was created with an allowed type to a type that is not allowed. |