Overview 545 matches · 44 in Waratek scope · 14 protected · 13 exploited · 9 CISA KEV · 17 public PoC · 14 EPSS ≥ 0.5
545matches
44in Waratek scope8.1%
14protected2.6%
13exploited2.4%
9CISA KEV1.7%
17public PoC3.1%
14EPSS ≥ 0.52.6%
Protected by Waratek
14
2.6%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
30
5.5%
Outside Waratek scope
2
0.4%
Not applicable
499
91.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
14
2.6%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
531
97.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 230 / year
20142
Not applicable2
Critical2
not blocked2
Exploited2
20151
No exploit published1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
201617
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable15
Critical17
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked16
Exploited1
No public exploit16
201726
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable24
Critical26
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked25
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit24
201829
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published3
Not applicable25
Critical29
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked28
Working exploit published1
No public exploit28
201923
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable22
Critical23
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked22
Exploited1
Working exploit published2
No public exploit20
202036
Protected by Waratek3
Not applicable33
Critical36
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked33
Exploited4
Forecast only1
No public exploit31
202130
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable29
Critical30
not blocked30
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit29
202231
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable30
Critical31
not blocked31
No public exploit31
202334
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published2
Not applicable30
Critical34
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked32
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit31
202442
Not applicable42
Critical42
not blocked42
Exploited2
No public exploit40
202544
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable43
Critical44
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked43
No public exploit44
2026230
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published22
Not applicable204
Critical230
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked226
Exploited1
No public exploit229
2014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-17362 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to create, modify, or delete tenants due to missing authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17301 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow an unauthenticated attacker to bypass authentication due to improper verification of a cryptographic signature. |
| CVE-2026-17299 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform arbitrary file reads and server-side request forgery due to unrestricted resolution of external references. Externally referenced content in submitted definitions is not sufficiently restricted when processed, and the retrieved content could be returned to the attacker. |
| CVE-2026-17298 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17297 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform an account takeover due to an open redirect vulnerability. The redirect address used during sign-in is not sufficiently validated, which could allow authentication results to be sent to an attacker-controlled location. |
| CVE-2026-17296 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-17292 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to take over ownership of other organizations due to broken object-level authorization. Access checks on organization objects are incomplete, which could allow ownership of organizations the user does not control to be changed. |
| CVE-2026-17291 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform account takeover due to an open redirect vulnerability. The redirect address used during OAuth 2.0 sign-in is not sufficiently validated, which could allow authentication results to be sent to an attacker-controlled location. |
| CVE-2026-17280 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthenticated brute-force attacks to obtain valid credentials due to improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. |
| CVE-2026-17278 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive API catalog and runtime configuration data due to improper authentication. Information supplied by the client is not sufficiently verified, which could allow a caller to appear as a trusted party. |
| CVE-2026-17239 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-17150 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code and access sensitive information from other tenants due to insufficient input validation. Uploaded custom module content is not sufficiently validated before it is processed, which could allow code to run with access beyond the user's own tenant. |
| CVE-2026-17147 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code and perform unauthorized administrative actions due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-17134 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to SQL injection. |
| CVE-2026-17132 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| CVE-2026-17131 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery. Restrictions on outbound requests can be bypassed, so the server could be made to contact unintended destinations and return the response. |
| CVE-2026-17117 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improperly controlled modification of object attributes. A user could set a field that should only be controlled by the system, which could lead to code execution. |
| CVE-2026-17066 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and modify or delete data belonging to other tenants due to missing authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17049 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and modify arbitrary documents due to authorization bypass through user-controlled keys. |
| CVE-2026-16920 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a confused deputy vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-16918 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to access internal network resources due to server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-16884 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection. |
| CVE-2026-16720 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM API Connect 10.0.8.0 through 10.0.8.12 and 12.1.0.0 through 12.1.1.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain valid access tokens for other users due to improper authentication. Authentication against a connected directory service is not sufficiently enforced, which could allow another user's identity to be assumed. |
| CVE-2026-123218 | Critical | 2026-11-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.19 could allow an authorized user to craft a specific message to bypass user authorization and gain full administrative privileges. |
| CVE-2026-82418 | Critical | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Watson Speech Services Cartridge 4.0.0 through 5.4.0 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a use-after-free vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-12665 | Critical | 2026-10-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM MQ could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack buffer overflow when processing TLS certificates with malformed distinguished names during channel connection establishment. |
| CVE-2026-96119 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code on the system due to improper data sanitization by the HTTP Server Administration web application. |
| CVE-2026-95695 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 20.0.0.12 through 26.0.0.10 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to incorrect authorization. |
| CVE-2026-93909 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.10 is vulnerable by an authentication bypass vulnerability when samlWeb-2.0 feature is enabled. |
| CVE-2026-93895 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 20.0.0.12 through 26.0.0.10 could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass access controls configured on gRPC service methods. |
| CVE-2026-82110 | Critical | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of pathname during a path traversal. |
| CVE-2026-82103 | Critical | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor. |
| CVE-2026-82101 | Critical | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-19622 | Critical | 2026-10-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and escalate privileges due to improper validation of sub-requests. |
| CVE-2026-84272 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 are vulnerable to missing authentication in the edge-controller component. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary container images and gain control of managed edge clusters. |
| CVE-2026-84249 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, and 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary management operations due to missing authentication for critical function. |
| CVE-2026-84246 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2026-84244 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Quick Search results grid. An unauthenticated attacker who can influence monitored database traffic could execute malicious script in the browser of an authenticated Guardium user. |
| CVE-2026-84209 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| CVE-2026-84198 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2026-84058 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the TDS (Microsoft SQL Server) PRELOGIN packet decoder. A remote attacker who can send a specially crafted TDS PRELOGIN packet to a network monitored by an IBM Guardium Collector may cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code on the Collector appliance. |
| CVE-2026-84057 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. |
| CVE-2026-84035 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2026-82900 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. |
| CVE-2026-82895 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2026-82344 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly functionality. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send crafted TDS login fragments that exceed the fixed-size reassembly buffer, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution on the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-82335 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the MongoDB protocol parser. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted MongoDB SCRAM username containing an excessive length and cause memory corruption, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution. |
| CVE-2026-82334 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based out-of-bounds read in the TDS7 LOGIN7 protocol parser. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted TDS LOGIN7 packet containing invalid offset or length values, potentially causing information disclosure or denial of service. |
| CVE-2026-81932 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. |
| CVE-2026-80381 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection. |
| CVE-2026-78406 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system due to the deserialization of untrusted data. |
| CVE-2026-78401 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system due to the deserialization of untrusted data. |
| CVE-2026-75875 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to path traversal. |
| CVE-2026-19491 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication due to improper authentication. |
| CVE-2026-16916 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a protection mechanism failure. |
| CVE-2026-16823 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. |
| CVE-2026-16340 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write in the RFC2047 encoded-word parser. |
| CVE-2026-15762 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write. |
| CVE-2026-14992 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 vulnerable to buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2026-14991 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A local user could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system. |
| CVE-2026-14988 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2026-14888 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a heap-based buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2026-14508 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and obtain sensitive information due to a use-after-free. |
| CVE-2026-14502 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain administrative access due to failure to reject empty passwords during LDAP authentication. |
| CVE-2026-14269 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. An unauthenticated remote attacker could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system. |
| CVE-2026-84436 | Critical | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the certificate export CLI functionality, allowing a privileged authenticated CLI user to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. |
| CVE-2026-81549 | Critical | 2026-09-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of the X-Forwarded-Proto header. |
| CVE-2026-6928 | Critical | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 references or accesses memory after it has been freed. This allows an attacker who can influence program execution or input may exploit this condition to corrupt memory, cause application crashes, or execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2026-6730 | Critical | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A local user could overflow the buffer and execute arbitrary code on the system. |
| CVE-2026-6721 | Critical | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker can supply specially crafted input that is incorporated into OS commands, resulting in arbitrary command execution on the underlying system. Successful exploitation allows remote code execution with the privileges of the affected application. |
| CVE-2026-18872 | Critical | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in the FTM UI NetworkAcknowledgement React component (NetworkAcknowledgement.jsx:42). A malicious actor can inject script into stored network acknowledgement data that executes in authenticated operator browsers, enabling session hijacking and unauthorized operator-level payment actions. |
| CVE-2026-18169 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper validation of symbolic links. |
| CVE-2026-18163 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper deserialization of untrusted data. |
| CVE-2026-18162 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of user-controlled input within the new Function constructor. |
| CVE-2026-17645 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management. |
| CVE-2026-17635 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper configuration of HTTP method-based security constraints. |
| CVE-2026-17618 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to view and modify sensitive information and cause a denial of service due to improper authorization. |
| CVE-2026-17472 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access or modify unauthorized resources due to the use of wildcards in RBAC permission definitions. |
| CVE-2026-16346 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. |
| CVE-2026-84082 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| CVE-2026-84078 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a missing authentication vulnerability in the LoadBalancerServlet. An unauthenticated user can access privileged load-balancer operations, potentially resulting in unauthorized actions and impact to the integrity and availability of the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-84075 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to missing authentication for the ChangeTrackerServlet. |
| CVE-2026-84073 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| CVE-2026-84064 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| CVE-2026-84031 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. |
| CVE-2026-82967 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass IP-based access controls and access the Guardium management interface. |
| CVE-2026-82832 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. |
| CVE-2026-82340 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to unauthenticated insecure deserialization and attacker-controlled reflective method dispatch in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener. A network attacker able to reach TCP port 16017 may submit crafted serialized messages and potentially cause unintended code execution in the Guardium appliance. |
| CVE-2026-81657 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system due to the deserialization of untrusted data. |
| CVE-2026-80442 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the exportCertificate functionality. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute unauthorized commands and impact the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-80441 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an unauthenticated second-order SQL injection vulnerability in the generateInsertQuery functionality of change-tracker-data.sql. A remote attacker could inject malicious SQL that is subsequently processed by the application, potentially resulting in compromise of the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. |
| CVE-2026-10027 | Critical | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM MQ could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow when processing malformed compressed data on channels configured with compression enabled. |
| CVE-2026-16338 | Critical | 2026-09-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 IBM DataStage could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform an arbitrary file write due to improper validation of file paths. |
| CVE-2026-82107 | Critical | 2026-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. |
| CVE-2026-82100 | Critical | 2026-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-80424 | Critical | 2026-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to create arbitrary files due to path traversal during archive extraction. |
| CVE-2026-78573 | Critical | 2026-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.7 could allow a remote attacker to gain administrative access due to the use of default credentials. |
| CVE-2026-77822 | Critical | 2026-09-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to server-side request forgery via DNS rebinding. |
| CVE-2026-18221 | Critical | 2026-09-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access due to improper validation of client-supplied authentication parameters. |
| CVE-2026-17207 | Critical | 2026-09-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and compromise integrity due to a buffer overflow. |