Overview 11 matches · 4 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
11matches
4in Waratek scope36.4%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
4
36.4%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
7
63.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
11
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
11
100.0%
split by
peak 6 / year
20161
No exploit published1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20176
No exploit published3
Not applicable3
Critical6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20181
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20191
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20200
20210
20221
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20231
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20162017201820192020202120222023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-31733 | Critical | 2023-02-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Starting with diego-release 2.55.0 and up to 2.69.0, and starting with CF Deployment 17.1 and up to 23.2.0, apps are accessible via another port on diego cells, allowing application ingress without a client certificate. If mTLS route integrity is enabled AND unproxied ports are turned off, then an attacker could connect to an application that should be only reachable via mTLS, without presenting a client certificate. |
| CVE-2018-25046 | Critical | 2022-12-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Due to improper path sanitization, archives containing relative file paths can cause files to be written (or overwritten) outside of the target directory. |
| CVE-2019-3801 | Critical | 2019-04-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cloud Foundry cf-deployment, versions prior to 7.9.0, contain java components that are using an insecure protocol to fetch dependencies when building. A remote unauthenticated malicious attacker could hijack the DNS entry for the dependency, and inject malicious code into the component. |
| CVE-2016-6658 | Critical | 2018-03-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Applications in cf-release before 245 can be configured and pushed with a user-provided custom buildpack using a URL pointing to the buildpack. Although it is not recommended, a user can specify a credential in the URL (basic auth or OAuth) to access the buildpack through the CLI. For example, the user could include a GitHub username and password in the URL to access a private repo. Because the URL to access the buildpack is stored unencrypted, an operator with privileged access to the Cloud Controller database could view these credentials. |
| CVE-2015-5172 | Critical | 2017-10-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire password reset links. |
| CVE-2015-5171 | Critical | 2017-10-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The password change functionality in Cloud Foundry Runtime cf-release before 216, UAA before 2.5.2, and Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) Elastic Runtime before 1.7.0 allow attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to expire existing sessions. |
| CVE-2017-4992 | Critical | 2017-06-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release versions prior to v261; UAA release 2.x versions prior to v2.7.4.17, 3.6.x versions prior to v3.6.11, 3.9.x versions prior to v3.9.13, and other versions prior to v4.2.0; and UAA bosh release (uaa-release) 13.x versions prior to v13.15, 24.x versions prior to v24.10, 30.x versions prior to 30.3, and other versions prior to v37. There is privilege escalation (arbitrary password reset) with user invitations. |
| CVE-2016-8218 | Critical | 2017-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation routing-release versions prior to 0.142.0 and cf-release versions 203 to 231. Incomplete validation logic in JSON Web Token (JWT) libraries can allow unprivileged attackers to impersonate other users to the routing API, aka an "Unauthenticated JWT signing algorithm in routing" issue. |
| CVE-2016-6655 | Critical | 2017-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation Cloud Foundry release versions prior to v245 and cf-mysql-release versions prior to v31. A command injection vulnerability was discovered in a common script used by many Cloud Foundry components. A malicious user may exploit numerous vectors to execute arbitrary commands on servers running Cloud Foundry. |
| CVE-2016-0761 | Critical | 2017-05-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cloud Foundry Garden-Linux versions prior to v0.333.0 and Elastic Runtime 1.6.x version prior to 1.6.17 contain a flaw in managing container files during Docker image preparation that could be used to delete, corrupt or overwrite host files and directories, including other container filesystems on the host. |
| CVE-2016-6637 | Critical | 2016-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF) before 242; UAA 2.x before 2.7.4.7, 3.x before 3.3.0.5, and 3.4.x before 3.4.4; UAA BOSH before 11.5 and 12.x before 12.5; Elastic Runtime before 1.6.40, 1.7.x before 1.7.21, and 1.8.x before 1.8.2; and Ops Manager 1.7.x before 1.7.13 and 1.8.x before 1.8.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that approve or deny a scope via a profile or authorize approval page. |