Overview 8 matches · 1 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
12.5%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
2
25.0%
No exploit published
5
62.5%
blocked by ARMR today
1
12.5%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
7
87.5%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
25.0%
Working exploit published
1
12.5%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
5
62.5%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q2 201
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Exploited1
Q3 200
Q4 200
Q1 210
Q2 210
Q3 210
Q4 212
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published1
High2
not blocked2
Exploited1
No public exploit1
Q1 220
Q2 221
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 220
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 230
Q4 230
Q1 240
Q2 240
Q3 241
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 240
Q1 250
Q2 251
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 250
Q4 251
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 261
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q3 20Q1 21Q3 21Q1 22Q3 22Q1 23Q3 23Q1 24Q3 24Q1 25Q3 25Q1 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-22739 | High | 2026-03-24 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Vulnerability in Spring Cloud when substituting the profile parameter from a request made to the Spring Cloud Config Server configured to the native file system as a backend, because it was possible to access files outside of the configured search directories.This issue affects Spring Cloud: from 3.1.X before 3.1.13, from 4.1.X before 4.1.9, from 4.2.X before 4.2.3, from 4.3.X before 4.3.2, from 5.0.X before 5.0.2. |
| CVE-2025-41253 | High | 2025-10-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The following versions of Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux may be vulnerable to the ability to expose environment variables and system properties to attackers. An application should be considered vulnerable when all the following are true: * The application is using Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux (Spring Cloud Gateway Server WebMVC is not vulnerable). * An admin or untrusted third party using Spring Expression Language (SpEL) to access environment variables or system properties via routes. * An untrusted third party could create a route that uses SpEL to access environment variables or system properties if: * The Spring Cloud Gateway Server Webflux actuator web endpoint is enabled via management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=gateway and management.endpoint.gateway.enabled=trueor management.endpoint.gateway.access=unrestricte. * The actuator endpoints are available to attackers. * The actuator endpoints are unsecured. |
| CVE-2025-41235 | High | 2025-05-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Cloud Gateway Server forwards the X-Forwarded-For and Forwarded headers from untrusted proxies. |
| CVE-2024-22271 | High | 2024-07-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Spring Cloud Function framework, versions 4.1.x prior to 4.1.2, 4.0.x prior to 4.0.8 an application is vulnerable to a DOS attack when attempting to compose functions with non-existing functions. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all of the following are true: User is using Spring Cloud Function Web module Affected Spring Products and Versions Spring Cloud Function Framework 4.1.0 to 4.1.2 4.0.0 to 4.0.8 References https://spring.io/security/cve-2022-22979 https://checkmarx.com/blog/spring-function-cloud-dos-cve-2022-22979-and-unintended-function-invocation/ History 2020-01-16: Initial vulnerability report published. |
| CVE-2022-22979 | High | 2022-06-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Spring Cloud Function versions prior to 3.2.6, it is possible for a user who directly interacts with framework provided lookup functionality to cause a denial-of-service condition due to the caching issue in the Function Catalog component of the framework. |
| CVE-2021-22053 | High | 2021-11-19 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | Applications using both `spring-cloud-netflix-hystrix-dashboard` and `spring-boot-starter-thymeleaf` expose a way to execute code submitted within the request URI path during the resolution of view templates. When a request is made at `/hystrix/monitor;[user-provided data]`, the path elements following `hystrix/monitor` are being evaluated as SpringEL expressions, which can lead to code execution. |
| CVE-2021-22044 | High | 2021-10-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Spring Cloud OpenFeign 3.0.0 to 3.0.4, 2.2.0.RELEASE to 2.2.9.RELEASE, and older unsupported versions, applications using type-level `@RequestMapping`annotations over Feign client interfaces, can be involuntarily exposing endpoints corresponding to `@RequestMapping`-annotated interface methods. |
| CVE-2020-5410 | High | 2020-06-02 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Spring Cloud Config, versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.3, versions 2.1.x prior to 2.1.9, and older unsupported versions allow applications to serve arbitrary configuration files through the spring-cloud-config-server module. A malicious user, or attacker, can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead to a directory traversal attack. |