Overview 820 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 73 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
820matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
73public PoC8.9%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
820
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
820
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
73
8.9%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
747
91.1%
split by
peak 137 / year
19921
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19930
19941
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19950
19961
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
19971
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19981
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
199929
Withdrawn CVE29
Unknown29
not blocked29
Working exploit published1
No public exploit28
20001
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20013
Withdrawn CVE3
Unknown3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
200214
Withdrawn CVE14
Unknown14
not blocked14
Working exploit published2
No public exploit12
200321
Withdrawn CVE21
Unknown21
not blocked21
Working exploit published1
No public exploit20
200428
Withdrawn CVE28
Unknown28
not blocked28
No public exploit28
200578
Withdrawn CVE78
Unknown78
not blocked78
Working exploit published5
No public exploit73
200651
Withdrawn CVE51
Unknown51
not blocked51
Working exploit published3
No public exploit48
200780
Withdrawn CVE80
Unknown80
not blocked80
Working exploit published3
No public exploit77
200832
Withdrawn CVE32
Unknown32
not blocked32
Working exploit published5
No public exploit27
200946
Withdrawn CVE46
Unknown46
not blocked46
Working exploit published6
No public exploit40
201028
Withdrawn CVE28
Unknown28
not blocked28
Working exploit published2
No public exploit26
201122
Withdrawn CVE22
Unknown22
not blocked22
Working exploit published3
No public exploit19
201263
Withdrawn CVE63
Unknown63
not blocked63
Working exploit published5
No public exploit58
2013137
Withdrawn CVE137
Unknown137
not blocked137
Working exploit published20
No public exploit117
201480
Withdrawn CVE80
Unknown80
not blocked80
Working exploit published11
No public exploit69
2015101
Withdrawn CVE101
Unknown101
not blocked101
Working exploit published5
No public exploit96
20161
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
1992199419961998200020022004200620082010201220142016
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-3197 | Unknown | 2016-01-29 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-3197. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-3197. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-3197 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-8581 | Unknown | 2015-12-16 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-0779. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2016-0779. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-0779 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-5280 | Unknown | 2015-12-15 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-8342 | Unknown | 2015-11-25 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-8135 | Unknown | 2015-11-25 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7265. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-7265. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7265 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-8134 | Unknown | 2015-11-25 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-8133 | Unknown | 2015-11-25 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7264. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-7264. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7264 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-8132 | Unknown | 2015-11-25 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7263. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-7263. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7263 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-5275 | Unknown | 2015-11-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-5257. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-5257. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-5257 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| CVE-2015-8075 | Unknown | 2015-11-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-5196 | Unknown | 2015-10-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7703. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-7703. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7703 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| CVE-2015-5881 | Unknown | 2015-10-09 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7760, CVE-2015-7761. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2015-7760 and CVE-2015-7761 to identify the ID or IDs of interest. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-5128 | Unknown | 2015-10-08 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-9298 | Unknown | 2015-10-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9750, CVE-2014-9751. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2014-9750 and CVE-2014-9751 to identify the ID or IDs of interest. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-9297 | Unknown | 2015-10-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9750, CVE-2014-9751. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2014-9750 and CVE-2014-9751 to identify the ID or IDs of interest. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-6666 | Unknown | 2015-09-20 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-6947 | Unknown | 2015-09-15 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-6946. Reason: This issue was MERGED into CVE-2015-6946 in accordance with CVE content decisions, because it is the same type of vulnerability and affects the same versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-6946 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-5197 | Unknown | 2015-09-15 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-5270 | Unknown | 2015-09-12 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-5226 | Unknown | 2015-09-12 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-5249 | Unknown | 2015-09-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-0942 | Unknown | 2015-08-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-6742, CVE-2015-6743, CVE-2015-6744, CVE-2015-6745, CVE-2015-6746, CVE-2015-6747. Reason: This candidate originally combined multiple issues that have different vulnerability types and other complex abstraction issues. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-6742, CVE-2015-6743, CVE-2015-6744, CVE-2015-6745, CVE-2015-6746, and CVE-2015-6747 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-5193 | Unknown | 2015-08-20 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7703. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-7703. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7703 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-5192 | Unknown | 2015-08-20 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-5195. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-5195. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-5195 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-3287 | Unknown | 2015-08-12 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-6587. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-6587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-6587 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-7234 | Unknown | 2015-08-04 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-7233. Reason: This issue was MERGED into CVE-2014-7233 in accordance with CVE content decisions, because it is the same type of vulnerability and affects the same versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-7233 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-2212 | Unknown | 2015-08-03 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-5623. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-5623. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-5623 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-4247 | Unknown | 2015-07-21 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in customer-controlled software. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-4246 | Unknown | 2015-07-21 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in customer-controlled software. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-4245 | Unknown | 2015-07-21 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in customer-controlled software. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-8176 | Unknown | 2015-07-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8176. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8176. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8176 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-4249 | Unknown | 2015-07-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in customer-controlled software. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-3199 | Unknown | 2015-07-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in a product. Notes: none. |
| CVE-2015-3157 | Unknown | 2015-07-02 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-3242 | Unknown | 2015-06-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-2723 | Unknown | 2015-06-20 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-4000. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-4000. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-4000 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-2865 | Unknown | 2015-06-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-4640, CVE-2015-4641. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was associated with two issues. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2015-4640 and CVE-2015-4641 to identify the ID or IDs of interest. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-6593 | Unknown | 2015-05-30 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6593. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-6593. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6593 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-0191 | Unknown | 2015-05-30 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-0191. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-0191. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-0191 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-8147 | Unknown | 2015-05-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8147. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8147. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8147 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-8146 | Unknown | 2015-05-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-8146. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-8146. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-8146 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-3168 | Unknown | 2015-05-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-3164. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-3164. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-3164 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-3685 | Unknown | 2015-05-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-0194 | Unknown | 2015-05-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| CVE-2014-4315 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA who allocated this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-4314 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA who allocated this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2014. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6161 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6160 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6159 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6158 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6157 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6156 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6155 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6154 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6153 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6152 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6151 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6150 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6149 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6148 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6147 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6146 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6145 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-6144 | Unknown | 2015-04-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-1353 | Unknown | 2015-03-30 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it cannot be considered a security issue in the originally named product because of that product's specification. Notes: none |
| CVE-2015-0159 | Unknown | 2015-03-25 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-3570. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-3570. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-3570 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-2235 | Unknown | 2015-03-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-1067. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-1067. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-1067 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-2168 | Unknown | 2015-03-03 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in customer-controlled software. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-2188 | Unknown | 2015-02-27 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-0607. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-0607. The wrong ID was used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-0607 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2012-3541 | Unknown | 2015-02-24 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| CVE-2015-2010 | Unknown | 2015-02-20 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-0010. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-0010. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-0010 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2013-6500 | Unknown | 2015-02-20 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| CVE-2014-7196 | Unknown | 2015-02-15 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-7169. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-7169. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-7169 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2015-0246 | Unknown | 2015-02-09 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-1493. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-1493. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-1493 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-8615 | Unknown | 2015-02-09 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-8614 | Unknown | 2015-02-09 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none |
| CVE-2013-4186 | Unknown | 2015-02-09 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| CVE-2014-0606 | Unknown | 2015-02-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-0603. Reason: This issue was MERGED into CVE-2014-0603 in accordance with CVE content decisions, because it is the same type of vulnerability and affects the same versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-0603 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-7865 | Unknown | 2015-01-18 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-999999 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references |
| CVE-2014-99999 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references |
| CVE-2014-9999 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references |
| CVE-2014-72038 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-2353. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-2353. The wrong ID was used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-2353 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-62771 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6271. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-6271. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6271 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-59156 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-2352. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-2352. The wrong ID was used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-2352 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-54321 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references |
| CVE-2014-456132 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references |
| CVE-2014-32537 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-2354. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-2354. The wrong ID was used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-2354 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-123456 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references |
| CVE-2014-100000 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references |
| CVE-2014-10000 | Unknown | 2015-01-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references |
| CVE-2014-1155 | Unknown | 2015-01-10 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9580. Reason: This candidate is not authorized for use because it is part of the 2014 CVE-ID ID-Syntax protection block, which protects against accidental truncation of CVE IDs with sequence numbers containing more than 4 digits. See references. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9580 instead of this candidate |
| CVE-2014-1137 | Unknown | 2015-01-10 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9445, CVE-2014-9581, CVE-2014-9582. Reason: This candidate is not authorized for use because it is part of the 2014 CVE-ID ID-Syntax protection block, which protects against accidental truncation of CVE IDs with sequence numbers containing more than 4 digits. See references. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9445, CVE-2014-9581, or CVE-2014-9582 instead of this candidate |
| CVE-2014-1004 | Unknown | 2015-01-10 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9456. Reason: This candidate is not authorized for use because it is part of the 2014 CVE-ID ID-Syntax protection block, which protects against accidental truncation of CVE IDs with sequence numbers containing more than 4 digits. See references. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9456 instead of this candidate |
| CVE-2014-9486 | Unknown | 2015-01-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9447. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-9447. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9447 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2014-4642 | Unknown | 2015-01-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-4641 | Unknown | 2015-01-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-4640 | Unknown | 2015-01-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-0631 | Unknown | 2015-01-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2014. Notes: none |
| CVE-2014-9492 | Unknown | 2015-01-05 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-9323. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-9323. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-9323 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |