Overview 11 matches · 2 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 7 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
2
18.2%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
5
45.5%
No exploit published
4
36.4%
blocked by ARMR today
2
18.2%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
9
81.8%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
7
63.6%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
4
36.4%
split by
peak 5 / year
20051
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
Working exploit published1
20060
20070
20080
20093
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published2
Medium3
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20101
Mitigation candidate1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20111
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20125
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published1
Medium5
not blocked5
Working exploit published4
No public exploit1
20052006200720082009201020112012
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2012-4386 | Medium | 2012-09-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The token check mechanism in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 does not properly validate the token name configuration parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by setting the token name configuration parameter to a session attribute. |
| CVE-2012-1007 | Medium | 2012-02-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 1.3.10 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the name parameter to struts-examples/upload/upload-submit.do, or the message parameter to (2) struts-cookbook/processSimple.do or (3) struts-cookbook/processDyna.do. |
| CVE-2012-1006 | Medium | 2012-02-07 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.14 and 2.2.3 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) name or (2) lastName parameter to struts2-showcase/person/editPerson.action, or the (3) clientName parameter to struts2-rest-showcase/orders. |
| CVE-2012-0393 | Medium | 2012-01-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The ParameterInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not prevent access to public constructors, which allows remote attackers to create or overwrite arbitrary files via a crafted parameter that triggers the creation of a Java object. |
| CVE-2012-0392 | Medium | 2012-01-08 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The CookieInterceptor component in Apache Struts before 2.3.1.1 does not use the parameter-name whitelist, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted HTTP Cookie header that triggers Java code execution through a static method. |
| CVE-2011-2087 | Medium | 2011-05-13 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in component handlers in the javatemplates (aka Java Templates) plugin in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.2.3 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an arbitrary parameter value to a .action URI, related to improper handling of value attributes in (1) FileHandler.java, (2) HiddenHandler.java, (3) PasswordHandler.java, (4) RadioHandler.java, (5) ResetHandler.java, (6) SelectHandler.java, (7) SubmitHandler.java, and (8) TextFieldHandler.java. |
| CVE-2010-1870 | Medium | 2010-08-17 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | The OGNL extensive expression evaluation capability in XWork in Struts 2.0.0 through 2.1.8.1, as used in Atlassian Fisheye, Crucible, and possibly other products, uses a permissive whitelist, which allows remote attackers to modify server-side context objects and bypass the "#" protection mechanism in ParameterInterceptors via the (1) #context, (2) #_memberAccess, (3) #root, (4) #this, (5) #_typeResolver, (6) #_classResolver, (7) #_traceEvaluations, (8) #_lastEvaluation, (9) #_keepLastEvaluation, and possibly other OGNL context variables, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-6504. |
| CVE-2008-6682 | Medium | 2009-04-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.x before 2.0.11.1 and 2.1.x before 2.1.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors associated with improper handling of (1) " (double quote) characters in the href attribute of an s:a tag and (2) parameters in the action attribute of an s:url tag. |
| CVE-2007-6726 | Medium | 2009-04-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Dojo 0.4.1 and 0.4.2, as used in Apache Struts and other products, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors involving (1) xip_client.html and (2) xip_server.html in src/io/. |
| CVE-2008-6505 | Medium | 2009-03-23 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Apache Struts 2.0.x before 2.0.12 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a ..%252f (encoded dot dot slash) in a URI with a /struts/ path, related to (1) FilterDispatcher in 2.0.x and (2) DefaultStaticContentLoader in 2.1.x. |
| CVE-2005-3745 | Medium | 2005-11-22 | Protected by Waratek | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Apache Struts 1.2.7, and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the query string, which is not properly quoted or filtered when the request handler generates an error message. |