Overview 431 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 29 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
431matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
29public PoC6.7%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
431
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
431
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
29
6.7%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
402
93.3%
split by
peak 80 / year
19921
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19930
19941
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19950
19961
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
19971
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19981
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
199929
Withdrawn CVE29
Unknown29
not blocked29
Working exploit published1
No public exploit28
20001
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20013
Withdrawn CVE3
Unknown3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
200214
Withdrawn CVE14
Unknown14
not blocked14
Working exploit published2
No public exploit12
200321
Withdrawn CVE21
Unknown21
not blocked21
Working exploit published1
No public exploit20
200428
Withdrawn CVE28
Unknown28
not blocked28
No public exploit28
200578
Withdrawn CVE78
Unknown78
not blocked78
Working exploit published5
No public exploit73
200651
Withdrawn CVE51
Unknown51
not blocked51
Working exploit published3
No public exploit48
200780
Withdrawn CVE80
Unknown80
not blocked80
Working exploit published3
No public exploit77
200832
Withdrawn CVE32
Unknown32
not blocked32
Working exploit published5
No public exploit27
200946
Withdrawn CVE46
Unknown46
not blocked46
Working exploit published6
No public exploit40
201028
Withdrawn CVE28
Unknown28
not blocked28
Working exploit published2
No public exploit26
201115
Withdrawn CVE15
Unknown15
not blocked15
No public exploit15
1993199519971999200120032005200720092011
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-4331 | Unknown | 2011-11-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4110. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-4110. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4110 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-2708 | Unknown | 2011-11-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-2710. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-2710. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-2710 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-4456 | Unknown | 2011-11-16 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4313. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-4313. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4313 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-3867 | Unknown | 2011-09-29 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-2998. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-2998. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-2998 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2004-2770 | Unknown | 2011-09-25 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-3389. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-3389. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-3389 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-2810 | Unknown | 2011-08-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-0253. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-0253. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-0253 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-1152 | Unknown | 2011-07-27 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-3712. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-3712. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-3712 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-1501 | Unknown | 2011-05-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1571. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-1571. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1571 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-1415 | Unknown | 2011-03-11 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1290. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-1290. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1290 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2007-1783 | Unknown | 2011-02-24 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1685. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1685. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1685 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-0634 | Unknown | 2011-02-22 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1002. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-1002. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1002 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2011-1057 | Unknown | 2011-02-21 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1056. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-1056. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1056 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-0190 | Unknown | 2011-02-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1016. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2009-1016. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1016 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-0189 | Unknown | 2011-02-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1012. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2009-1012. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1012 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-3932 | Unknown | 2011-01-21 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2010. Notes: none |
| CVE-2010-4501 | Unknown | 2010-12-08 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4334. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4334. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4334 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-4510 | Unknown | 2010-12-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4150. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4150. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4150 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-3866 | Unknown | 2010-11-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, CVE-2010-4209. Reason: This candidate originally combined three issues that affected different versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, or CVE-2010-4209 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-4200 | Unknown | 2010-11-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4008. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4008. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4008 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-3885 | Unknown | 2010-10-08 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-3227. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-3227. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-3227 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-3410 | Unknown | 2010-09-16 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1825. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1825. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1825 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-3409 | Unknown | 2010-09-16 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1824. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1824. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1824 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-3408 | Unknown | 2010-09-16 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1823. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1823. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1823 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-3278 | Unknown | 2010-09-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-3110. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2010-3110. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-3110 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-2533 | Unknown | 2010-08-21 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-2621. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2010-2621. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-2621 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-3016 | Unknown | 2010-08-17 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-2803. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2010-2803. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-2803 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-2972 | Unknown | 2010-08-05 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1797. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1797. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1797 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-0099 | Unknown | 2010-07-22 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0092. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0092. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0092 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-2304 | Unknown | 2010-06-15 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1773. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1773. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1773 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-2303 | Unknown | 2010-06-15 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1772. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1772. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1772 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-2052 | Unknown | 2010-06-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-2155. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-2155. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-2155 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-2077 | Unknown | 2010-05-25 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1640. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1640. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1640 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-1145 | Unknown | 2010-05-20 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4498. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4498. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4498 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-1974 | Unknown | 2010-05-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1168. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1168. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1168 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-1456 | Unknown | 2010-05-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1455. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1455. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1455 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-1745 | Unknown | 2010-05-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1867. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1867. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1867 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-1738 | Unknown | 2010-05-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1448. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1448. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1448 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-1501 | Unknown | 2010-04-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1767. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1767. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1767 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-1564 | Unknown | 2010-04-14 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1564. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1564. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1564 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-0200 | Unknown | 2010-04-14 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1241. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1241. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1241 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-1144 | Unknown | 2010-04-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0751, CVE-2010-1277. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but it was accidentally assigned to two different issues, one for libnids and another for Zabbix. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0751 (libnids) and CVE-2010-1277 (Zabbix) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2010-0735 | Unknown | 2010-03-18 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0969. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0969. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0969 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-3297 | Unknown | 2010-03-02 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-4481 | Unknown | 2009-12-30 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3111. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3111. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3111 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-4132 | Unknown | 2009-12-12 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4214. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4214. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4214 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-3908 | Unknown | 2009-12-12 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3608. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-3907 | Unknown | 2009-12-12 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3607. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3607. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3607 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-3906 | Unknown | 2009-12-12 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3606. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-4054 | Unknown | 2009-11-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3672. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3672. The duplicate was assigned by the CNA without proper coordination with MITRE. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3672 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-4826 | Unknown | 2009-11-16 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3853. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3853. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3853 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-3610 | Unknown | 2009-11-10 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3695. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3695. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3695 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-1563 | Unknown | 2009-10-29 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0689. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-0689. Certain codebase relationships were not originally clear. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-0689 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-3454 | Unknown | 2009-09-29 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2510. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2510. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2510 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-3239 | Unknown | 2009-09-18 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2139, CVE-2009-2140. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2139 and CVE-2009-2140. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2139 and CVE-2009-2140 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-2962 | Unknown | 2009-08-21 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2692. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2692. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2692 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-2845 | Unknown | 2009-08-18 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2768. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2768. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2768 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-2086 | Unknown | 2009-08-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-0907 | Unknown | 2009-08-13 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1899. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1899. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1899 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-2645 | Unknown | 2009-07-30 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2408. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2408. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2408 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-2580 | Unknown | 2009-07-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1862. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-2315 | Unknown | 2009-07-05 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2204. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2204. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2204 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-2259 | Unknown | 2009-06-30 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2608. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-3870 | Unknown | 2009-06-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3870. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3870. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3870 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-0786 | Unknown | 2009-05-22 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was documented behavior by that function. Notes: Future CVE identifiers might be assigned to applications that mis-use the API in a security-relevant fashion. |
| CVE-2009-1676 | Unknown | 2009-05-18 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1535. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1535. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1535 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-6800 | Unknown | 2009-05-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not a security issue. It was originally created based on one vendor's misinterpretation of an upstream changelog comment that referred to a race condition in the winbind daemon (aka winbindd) in Samba before 3.0.32. The upstream vendor states: "The Samba Team sees no way to exploit this race condition by a user of the system or an external attacker. In order to be able to trigger the race condition a privileged user (root) need to intentionally kill a winbind child process and carefully time the killing to trigger the race condition. Although, if the user is already privileged, it can more easily just kill the parent process directly." CVE concurs with the dispute. Notes: CVE users should not use this identifier |
| CVE-2009-0795 | Unknown | 2009-04-08 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-6628 | Unknown | 2009-04-06 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-6268. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-6268. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-6268 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-1205 | Unknown | 2009-04-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-4312 | Unknown | 2009-03-29 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2009-0782 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2009-0589 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2008-5020 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-4317 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5019. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-5019. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5019 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-3518 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3283. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-3517 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3522. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3522. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3522 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-3284 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3283. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-2804 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2800. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-2800. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2800 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-2373 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2863. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-2863. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2863 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-1674 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2008-1378 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, CVE-2008-2362. Reason: This candidate has been withdrawn by its CNA. It was SPLIT into separate candidates before publication. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, and CVE-2008-2362 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-0004 | Unknown | 2009-03-26 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2009-0671 | Unknown | 2009-02-22 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: Format string vulnerability in the University of Washington (UW) c-client library, as used by the UW IMAP toolkit imap-2007d and other applications, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the initial request to the IMAP port (143/tcp). NOTE: Red Hat has disputed the vulnerability, stating "The Red Hat Security Response Team have been unable to confirm the existence of this format string vulnerability in the toolkit, and the sample published exploit is not complete or functional." CVE agrees that the exploit contains syntax errors and uses Unix-only include files while invoking Windows functions |
| CVE-2008-6176 | Unknown | 2009-02-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-6171. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-6171. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-6171 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-6067 | Unknown | 2009-02-05 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5838. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5838. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5838 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-6049 | Unknown | 2009-02-04 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in TinyMCE 2.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the menuID parameter. NOTE: CVE and multiple reliable third parties dispute this issue, since TinyMCE does not contain index.php or any PHP code. This may be an issue in a product that has integrated TinyMCE |
| CVE-2009-0300 | Unknown | 2009-01-27 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2636. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2636. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2636 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2009-0242 | Unknown | 2009-01-21 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: gmetad in Ganglia 3.1.1, when supporting multiple requests per connection on an interactive port, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a request to the gmetad service with a path that does not exist, which causes Ganglia to (1) perform excessive CPU computation and (2) send the entire tree, which consumes network bandwidth. NOTE: the vendor and original researcher have disputed this issue, since legitimate requests can generate the same amount of resource consumption. CVE concurs with the dispute, so this identifier should not be used |
| CVE-2008-5850 | Unknown | 2009-01-06 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was originally recorded for a "SPLAT Remote Root Exploit" that was claimed to exist for Check Point SmartCenter. The claim has no actionable details and was disclosed by a person of unknown reliability who did not coordinate with the vendor. No people of known reliability have confirmed the original claim. The vendor has not indicated that they are aware of any vulnerability. Since the claim has no actionable details or independent verification, it is outside the scope of CVE according to current inclusion criteria |
| CVE-2008-4270 | Unknown | 2008-12-30 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5416. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5416. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5416 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-5622 | Unknown | 2008-12-17 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5621. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5621. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5621 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-6432 | Unknown | 2008-11-04 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6432. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6432. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6432 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-4920 | Unknown | 2008-11-04 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was based on an incorrect claim regarding a directory issue in Agavi. The vendor has disputed the issue and the original researcher has retracted the original claim, so this is not a vulnerability. Further investigation by the vendor and original researcher show that the original issue was in a site-specific modification, which is outside the scope of CVE. Notes: CVE users should not use this identifier |
| CVE-2008-4422 | Unknown | 2008-10-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-4409. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-4409. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-4409 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-4430 | Unknown | 2008-10-03 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3699. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3699. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3699 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-4189 | Unknown | 2008-09-23 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1105. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1105. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1105 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-4112 | Unknown | 2008-09-16 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3195. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3195. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3195 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-4042 | Unknown | 2008-09-11 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3889. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3889. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3889 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-2728 | Unknown | 2008-09-02 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2726. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2726. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2726 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2008-2727 | Unknown | 2008-09-02 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2725. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2725. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2725 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |