Overview 73 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
73matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
5public PoC6.8%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
73
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
73
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
5
6.8%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
68
93.2%
split by
peak 29 / year
19921
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19930
19941
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19950
19961
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
19971
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19981
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
199929
Withdrawn CVE29
Unknown29
not blocked29
Working exploit published1
No public exploit28
20001
Withdrawn CVE1
Unknown1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20013
Withdrawn CVE3
Unknown3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
200214
Withdrawn CVE14
Unknown14
not blocked14
Working exploit published2
No public exploit12
200321
Withdrawn CVE21
Unknown21
not blocked21
Working exploit published1
No public exploit20
199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2003-1147 | Unknown | 2003-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0955. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0955. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0955 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-1130 | Unknown | 2003-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-1071. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-1071. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-1071 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0698 | Unknown | 2003-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0743. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0743. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0743 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0691 | Unknown | 2003-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not associated with any specific security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2003-0582 | Unknown | 2003-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0504. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0504. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0504 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0463 | Unknown | 2003-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| CVE-2003-0351 | Unknown | 2003-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0306. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0306. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0306 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0090 | Unknown | 2003-12-15 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-0844. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-0844. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-0844 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0964 | Unknown | 2003-11-17 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: N/A. Notes: none |
| CVE-2003-0879 | Unknown | 2003-11-17 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0518. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0518. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0518 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0867 | Unknown | 2003-11-17 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0662. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0662. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0662 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0862 | Unknown | 2003-11-17 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0813. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2003-0813. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0813 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0790 | Unknown | 2003-11-17 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: the reported issue is not a vulnerability or exposure. Notes: This candidate was assigned to a "head-reading" bug in a component of fetchmail 6.2.4 and earlier, which was claimed to allow a denial of service. However, the bug is in a broken component of fetchmail that is not "reachable" by any execution path, so it cannot be triggered by any sort of attack and is not exploitable |
| CVE-2003-1565 | Unknown | 2003-08-27 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1565. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1565. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1565 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0598 | Unknown | 2003-08-27 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0657. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0657. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0657 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0591 | Unknown | 2003-08-27 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate number that was created during the refinement phase. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0158 | Unknown | 2003-03-24 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0139. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0139 due to incomplete coordination. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0139 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2003-0157 | Unknown | 2003-03-24 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2003-0138. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2003-0138 due to incomplete coordination. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2003-0138 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-0841 | Unknown | 2003-03-03 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0842. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0842. The duplicate assignment was made before public disclosure. Notes: none |
| CVE-2002-1404 | Unknown | 2003-02-19 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1348. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1348. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1348 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-1263 | Unknown | 2003-01-07 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1295. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1295. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1295 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-2194 | Unknown | 2002-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1589. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1589. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1589 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-2160 | Unknown | 2002-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1798. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1798. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1798 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-2157 | Unknown | 2002-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1660. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1660. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1660 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-2151 | Unknown | 2002-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1651. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1651. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1651 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-2147 | Unknown | 2002-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1828. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1828. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1828 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-2136 | Unknown | 2002-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1590. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1590. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1590 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-2135 | Unknown | 2002-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1618. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-1618. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1618 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-1261 | Unknown | 2002-12-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1292. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1292. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1292 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-1259 | Unknown | 2002-12-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1286. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1286. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-1286 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-1161 | Unknown | 2002-12-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-1380. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-1380. Notes: none |
| CVE-2002-1234 | Unknown | 2002-11-04 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0180. Reason: This candidate is a an out-of-band assignment duplicate of CVE-2002-0180. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0180 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-0828 | Unknown | 2002-08-12 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0862. Reason: This is a duplicate of CVE-2002-0862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2002-0192 | Unknown | 2002-05-29 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0193, CVE-2002-1564. Reason: This candidate was published with a description that identified a different vulnerability than what was identified in the original authoritative reference. Notes: Consult CVE-2002-0193 or CVE-2002-1564 to find the identifier for the proper issue |
| CVE-2002-1638 | Unknown | 2002-05-27 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-2153. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2002-2153. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-2153 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2001-1492 | Unknown | 2001-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-1460. Reason: This candidate is a refinement duplicate of CVE-2001-1460. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2001-1460 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2001-1167 | Unknown | 2001-08-28 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-0976. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2001-0976. Notes: CVE-2001-0976 should be used instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2001-1121 | Unknown | 2001-07-02 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2001-1084. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2001-1084. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2001-1084 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-2000-0744 | Unknown | 2000-10-20 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2000-0743. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2000-0743. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2000-0743 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-1999-0660 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, so it is out of scope of CVE. It might be more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A hacker utility, back door, or Trojan Horse is installed on a system, e.g. NetBus, Back Orifice, Rootkit, etc. |
| CVE-1999-0659 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A Windows NT Primary Domain Controller (PDC) or Backup Domain Controller (BDC) is present. |
| CVE-1999-0658 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "DCOM is running. |
| CVE-1999-0655 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not about any specific product, protocol, or design, so it is out of scope of CVE. Notes: the former description is: "A service may include useful information in its banner or help function (such as the name and version), making it useful for information gathering activities. |
| CVE-1999-0652 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A database service is running, e.g. a SQL server, Oracle, or mySQL. |
| CVE-1999-0649 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The FSP service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0648 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The X25 service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0647 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The bootparam (bootparamd) service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0646 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The LDAP service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0645 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The IRC service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0644 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The NNTP news service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0643 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The IMAP service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0642 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A POP service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0634 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SSH service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0633 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The HTTP/WWW service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0631 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The NFS service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0623 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The X Windows service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0622 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A component service related to DNS service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0621 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A component service related to NETBIOS is running. |
| CVE-1999-0620 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "A component service related to NIS is running. |
| CVE-1999-0619 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The Telnet service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0617 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SMTP service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0616 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The TFTP service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0615 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The SNMP service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0614 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "The FTP service is running. |
| CVE-1999-0531 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is solely about a configuration that does not directly introduce security vulnerabilities, so it is more appropriate to cover under the Common Configuration Enumeration (CCE). Notes: the former description is: "An SMTP service supports EXPN, VRFY, HELP, ESMTP, and/or EHLO. |
| CVE-1999-0187 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0022. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0022. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0022 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-1999-0110 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0315. Reason: This candidate's original description had a typo that delayed it from being detected as a duplicate of CVE-1999-0315. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0315 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-1999-0020 | Unknown | 1999-01-01 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0032. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0032. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0032 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-1999-1108 | Unknown | 1998-11-18 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1107. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-1107. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-1107 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-1999-0282 | Unknown | 1997-09-23 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1584, CVE-1999-1586. Reason: This candidate combined references from one issue with the description from another issue. Notes: Users should consult CVE-1999-1584 and CVE-1999-1586 to obtain the appropriate name. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-1999-0335 | Unknown | 1996-08-01 | Withdrawn CVE | Working exploit published | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-0032. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-0032. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-0032 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-1999-1310 | Unknown | 1994-11-04 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1022. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-1022. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-1022 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| CVE-1999-1056 | Unknown | 1992-12-31 | Withdrawn CVE | No public exploit | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-1999-1395. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-1999-1395. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-1999-1395 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |