Overview 4,830 matches · 0 protected · 21 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 194 public PoC · 61 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
202
4.2%
No exploit published
4,628
95.8%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4,830
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 713 / year
19961
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19970
19980
19992
No exploit published2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200012
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published6
High5
Medium7
not blocked12
Working exploit published6
No public exploit6
200112
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published10
High6
Medium6
not blocked12
Working exploit published2
No public exploit10
200234
Mitigation candidate8
No exploit published26
High10
Medium21
Low3
not blocked34
Working exploit published8
Forecast only2
No public exploit24
200337
Mitigation candidate7
No exploit published30
High9
Medium22
Low6
not blocked37
Working exploit published7
No public exploit30
200425
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published24
High5
Medium17
Low3
not blocked25
Working exploit published1
No public exploit24
200579
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published75
Critical1
High30
Medium43
Low5
not blocked79
Working exploit published4
No public exploit75
2006125
Mitigation candidate4
No exploit published121
High62
Medium52
Low11
not blocked125
Working exploit published4
No public exploit121
2007144
Mitigation candidate10
No exploit published134
High65
Medium69
Low10
not blocked144
Working exploit published10
No public exploit134
2008129
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published120
High43
Medium79
Low7
not blocked129
Working exploit published9
No public exploit120
2009194
Mitigation candidate13
No exploit published181
High49
Medium124
Low21
not blocked194
Exploited1
Working exploit published12
No public exploit181
2010174
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published162
High25
Medium127
Low22
not blocked174
Exploited1
Working exploit published11
Forecast only1
No public exploit161
2011187
Mitigation candidate9
No exploit published178
High19
Medium135
Low33
not blocked187
Working exploit published9
No public exploit178
2012300
Mitigation candidate22
No exploit published278
High27
Medium193
Low80
not blocked300
Exploited3
Working exploit published19
No public exploit278
2013322
Mitigation candidate17
No exploit published305
High33
Medium236
Low53
not blocked322
Exploited2
Working exploit published14
Forecast only1
No public exploit305
2014294
Mitigation candidate12
No exploit published282
High21
Medium224
Low49
not blocked294
Exploited2
Working exploit published10
No public exploit282
2015291
Mitigation candidate6
No exploit published285
Critical1
High34
Medium206
Low50
not blocked291
Exploited1
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit285
2016476
Mitigation candidate11
No exploit published465
Critical33
High115
Medium295
Low33
not blocked476
Working exploit published11
Forecast only1
No public exploit464
2017696
Mitigation candidate14
No exploit published682
Critical46
High297
Medium331
Low22
not blocked696
Exploited4
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only1
No public exploit681
2018713
Mitigation candidate16
No exploit published697
Critical35
High232
Medium436
Low10
not blocked713
Exploited3
Working exploit published12
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit697
2019583
Mitigation candidate19
No exploit published564
Critical30
High227
Medium313
Low13
not blocked583
Exploited4
Working exploit published15
Forecast only2
No public exploit562
199719992001200320052007200920112013201520172019
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-4305 | Medium | 2019-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server Liberty could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information caused by the improper setting of a cookie. IBM X-Force ID: 160951. |
| CVE-2019-4304 | Medium | 2019-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions caused by improper session validation. IBM X-Force ID: 160950. |
| CVE-2019-16869 | High | 2019-09-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Netty before 4.1.42.Final mishandles whitespace before the colon in HTTP headers (such as a "Transfer-Encoding : chunked" line), which leads to HTTP request smuggling. |
| CVE-2019-10430 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins NeuVector Vulnerability Scanner Plugin 1.5 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10429 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins GitLab Logo Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10428 | High | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Aqua Security Scanner Plugin 3.0.17 and earlier transmitted configured credentials in plain text as part of the global Jenkins configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10427 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Aqua MicroScanner Plugin 1.0.7 and earlier transmitted configured credentials in plain text as part of the global Jenkins configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10426 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Gem Publisher Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10424 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins elOyente Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10423 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins CodeScan Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10422 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Call Remote Job Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10420 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Assembla Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10419 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins vFabric Application Director Plugin stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10418 | Critical | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Kubernetes :: Pipeline :: Arquillian Steps Plugin provides a custom whitelist for script security that allowed attackers to invoke arbitrary methods, bypassing typical sandbox protection. |
| CVE-2019-10417 | Critical | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Kubernetes :: Pipeline :: Kubernetes Steps Plugin provides a custom whitelist for script security that allowed attackers to invoke arbitrary methods, bypassing typical sandbox protection. |
| CVE-2019-10416 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Violation Comments to GitLab Plugin 2.28 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10415 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Violation Comments to GitLab Plugin 2.28 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10414 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Git Changelog Plugin 2.17 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10413 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Data Theorem: CI/CD Plugin 1.3 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10412 | High | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Inedo ProGet Plugin 1.2 and earlier transmitted configured credentials in plain text as part of the global Jenkins configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10411 | High | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Inedo BuildMaster Plugin 2.4.0 and earlier transmitted configured credentials in plain text as part of the global Jenkins configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10410 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Log Parser Plugin 2.0 and earlier did not escape an error message, resulting in a cross-site scripting vulnerability exploitable by users able to define log parsing rules. |
| CVE-2019-10409 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Project Inheritance Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier allowed attackers with Overall/Read permission to trigger project generation from templates. |
| CVE-2019-10408 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Project Inheritance Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier allowed attackers to trigger project generation from templates. |
| CVE-2019-10407 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Project Inheritance Plugin 2.0.0 and earlier displayed a list of environment variables passed to a build without masking sensitive variables contributed by the Mask Passwords Plugin. |
| CVE-2019-10406 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier did not restrict or filter values set as Jenkins URL in the global configuration, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Overall/Administer permission. |
| CVE-2019-10405 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier printed the value of the "Cookie" HTTP request header on the /whoAmI/ URL, allowing attackers exploiting another XSS vulnerability to obtain the HTTP session cookie despite it being marked HttpOnly. |
| CVE-2019-10404 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier did not escape the reason why a queue items is blcoked in tooltips, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by users able to control parts of the reason a queue item is blocked, such as label expressions not matching any idle executors. |
| CVE-2019-10403 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier did not escape the SCM tag name on the tooltip for SCM tag actions, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by users able to control SCM tag names for these actions. |
| CVE-2019-10402 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier, the f:combobox form control interpreted its item labels as HTML, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by users with permission to define its contents. |
| CVE-2019-10401 | Medium | 2019-09-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Jenkins 2.196 and earlier, LTS 2.176.3 and earlier, the f:expandableTextBox form control interpreted its content as HTML when expanded, resulting in a stored XSS vulnerability exploitable by users with permission to define its contents (typically Job/Configure). |
| CVE-2019-12407 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the remember parameter on some of the JSPs, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-12404 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to InfoContent.jsp, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-10755 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The SAML identifier generated within SAML2Utils.java was found to make use of the apache commons-lang3 RandomStringUtils class which makes them predictable due to RandomStringUtils PRNG's algorithm not being cryptographically strong. This issue only affects the 3.X release of pac4j-saml. |
| CVE-2019-10754 | High | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple classes used within Apereo CAS before release 6.1.0-RC5 makes use of apache commons-lang3 RandomStringUtils for token and ID generation which makes them predictable due to RandomStringUtils PRNG's algorithm not being cryptographically strong. |
| CVE-2019-10090 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the plain editor, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-10089 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the WYSIWYG editor, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-10087 | Medium | 2019-09-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | On Apache JSPWiki, up to version 2.11.0.M4, a carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki, related to the Page Revision History, which could allow the attacker to execute javascript in the victim's browser and get some sensitive information about the victim. |
| CVE-2019-4505 | Medium | 2019-09-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 Network Deployment could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, caused by sending a specially-crafted URL. This can lead the attacker to view any file in a certain directory. IBM X-Force ID: 164364. |
| CVE-2019-3739 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys. |
| CVE-2019-3738 | Medium | 2019-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to a Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key. |
| CVE-2019-4477 | Medium | 2019-09-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 could allow a user with access to audit logs to obtain sensitive information, caused by improper handling of command line options. IBM X-Force ID: 163997. |
| CVE-2019-4271 | Low | 2019-09-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 Admin console is vulnerable to a Client-side HTTP parameter pollution vulnerability. IBM X-Force ID: 160243. |
| CVE-2019-16370 | Medium | 2019-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The PGP signing plugin in Gradle before 6.0 relies on the SHA-1 algorithm, which might allow an attacker to replace an artifact with a different one that has the same SHA-1 message digest, a related issue to CVE-2005-4900. |
| CVE-2019-10071 | Critical | 2019-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The code which checks HMAC in form submissions used String.equals() for comparisons, which results in a timing side channel for the comparison of the HMAC signatures. This could lead to remote code execution if an attacker is able to determine the correct signature for their payload. The comparison should be done with a constant time algorithm instead. |
| CVE-2019-10400 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.62 and earlier related to the handling of subexpressions in increment and decrement expressions not involving actual assignment allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. |
| CVE-2019-10399 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.62 and earlier related to the handling of property names in property expressions in increment and decrement expressions allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. |
| CVE-2019-10398 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Beaker Builder Plugin 1.9 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10397 | Low | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Aqua Security Serverless Scanner Plugin 1.0.4 and earlier transmitted configured passwords in plain text as part of job configuration forms, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10396 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Dashboard View Plugin 2.11 and earlier did not escape build descriptions, resulting in a cross-site scripting vulnerability exploitable by users able to change build descriptions. |
| CVE-2019-10395 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Build Environment Plugin 1.6 and earlier did not escape variables shown on its views, resulting in a cross-site scripting vulnerability in Jenkins 2.145, 2.138.1, or older, exploitable by users able to change various job/build properties. |
| CVE-2019-10394 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.62 and earlier related to the handling of property names in property expressions on the left-hand side of assignment expressions allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. |
| CVE-2019-10393 | Medium | 2019-09-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1.62 and earlier related to the handling of method names in method call expressions allowed attackers to execute arbitrary code in sandboxed scripts. |
| CVE-2019-11777 | High | 2019-09-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In the Eclipse Paho Java client library version 1.2.0, when connecting to an MQTT server using TLS and setting a host name verifier, the result of that verification is not checked. This could allow one MQTT server to impersonate another and provide the client library with incorrect information. |
| CVE-2019-16148 | Medium | 2019-09-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Sakai through 12.6 allows XSS via a chat user name. |
| CVE-2019-16147 | Medium | 2019-09-09 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Liferay Portal through 7.2.0 GA1 allows XSS via a journal article title to journal_article/page.jsp in journal/journal-taglib. |
| CVE-2019-10753 | Medium | 2019-09-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In all versions prior to version 3.9.6 for eclipse-wtp, all versions prior to version 9.4.4 for eclipse-cdt, and all versions prior to version 3.0.1 for eclipse-groovy, Spotless was resolving dependencies over an insecure channel (http). If the build occurred over an insecure connection, a malicious user could have perform a Man-in-the-Middle attack during the build and alter the build artifacts that were produced. In case that any of these artifacts were compromised, any developers using these could be altered. **Note:** In order to validate that this artifact was not compromised, the maintainer would need to confirm that none of the artifacts published to the registry were not altered with. Until this happens, we can not guarantee that this artifact was not compromised even though the probability that this happened is low. |
| CVE-2019-12402 | High | 2019-08-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The file name encoding algorithm used internally in Apache Commons Compress 1.15 to 1.18 can get into an infinite loop when faced with specially crafted inputs. This can lead to a denial of service attack if an attacker can choose the file names inside of an archive created by Compress. |
| CVE-2019-10391 | Medium | 2019-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins IBM Application Security on Cloud Plugin 1.2.4 and earlier transmitted configured passwords in plain text as part of job configuration forms, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10390 | High | 2019-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A sandbox bypass vulnerability in Jenkins Splunk Plugin 1.7.4 and earlier allowed attackers with Overall/Read permission to provide a Groovy script to an HTTP endpoint that can result in arbitrary code execution on the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-10384 | High | 2019-08-28 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins 2.191 and earlier, LTS 2.176.2 and earlier allowed users to obtain CSRF tokens without an associated web session ID, resulting in CSRF tokens that did not expire and could be used to bypass CSRF protection for the anonymous user. |
| CVE-2019-13236 | Medium | 2019-08-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | In system/workplace/ in Alkacon OpenCms 10.5.4 and 10.5.5, there are multiple Reflected and Stored XSS issues in the management interface. |
| CVE-2019-13235 | Medium | 2019-08-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | In the Alkacon OpenCms Apollo Template 10.5.4 and 10.5.5, there is XSS in the Login form. |
| CVE-2019-13234 | Medium | 2019-08-27 | Mitigation candidate | Working exploit published | In the Alkacon OpenCms Apollo Template 10.5.4 and 10.5.5, there is XSS in the search engine. |
| CVE-2019-15488 | Medium | 2019-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Ignite Realtime Openfire before 4.4.1 has reflected XSS via an LDAP setup test. |
| CVE-2019-15477 | Medium | 2019-08-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jooby before 1.6.4 has XSS via the default error handler. |
| CVE-2019-10201 | High | 2019-08-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that Keycloak's SAML broker, versions up to 6.0.1, did not verify missing message signatures. If an attacker modifies the SAML Response and removes the <Signature> sections, the message is still accepted, and the message can be modified. An attacker could use this flaw to impersonate other users and gain access to sensitive information. |
| CVE-2019-10199 | High | 2019-08-14 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that Keycloak's account console, up to 6.0.1, did not perform adequate header checks in some requests. An attacker could use this flaw to trick an authenticated user into performing operations via request from an untrusted domain. |
| CVE-2019-12397 | Medium | 2019-08-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Policy import functionality in Apache Ranger 0.7.0 to 1.2.0 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting issue. Upgrade to 2.0.0 or later version of Apache Ranger with the fix. |
| CVE-2019-10389 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Relution Enterprise Appstore Publisher Plugin 1.24 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins initiate an HTTP connection to an attacker-specified server. |
| CVE-2019-10388 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Relution Enterprise Appstore Publisher Plugin 1.24 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins initiate an HTTP connection to an attacker-specified server. |
| CVE-2019-10387 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins XL TestView Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier in XLTestView.XLTestDescriptor#doTestConnection allows users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10386 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins XL TestView Plugin 1.2.0 and earlier in XLTestView.XLTestDescriptor#doTestConnection allows users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10385 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins eggPlant Plugin 2.2 and earlier stores credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10381 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Codefresh Integration Plugin 1.8 and earlier disables SSL/TLS and hostname verification globally for the Jenkins master JVM. |
| CVE-2019-10380 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Simple Travis Pipeline Runner Plugin 1.0 and earlier specifies unsafe values in its custom Script Security whitelist, allowing attackers able to execute Script Security protected scripts to execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2019-10378 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins TestLink Plugin 3.16 and earlier stores credentials unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins master where they can be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10377 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Avatar Plugin 1.2 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read access to change the avatar of any user of Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10372 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An open redirect vulnerability in Jenkins Gitlab Authentication Plugin 1.4 and earlier in GitLabSecurityRealm.java allows attackers to redirect users to a URL outside Jenkins after successful login. |
| CVE-2019-10371 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A session fixation vulnerability in Jenkins Gitlab Authentication Plugin 1.4 and earlier in GitLabSecurityRealm.java allows unauthorized attackers to impersonate another user if they can control the pre-authentication session. |
| CVE-2019-10370 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Mask Passwords Plugin 2.12.0 and earlier transmits globally configured passwords in plain text as part of the configuration form, potentially resulting in their exposure. |
| CVE-2019-10369 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins JClouds Plugin 2.14 and earlier in BlobStoreProfile.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection and JCloudsCloud.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection allowed users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10368 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins JClouds Plugin 2.14 and earlier in BlobStoreProfile.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection and JCloudsCloud.DescriptorImpl#doTestConnection allowed users with Overall/Read access to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10367 | Medium | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Due to an incomplete fix of CVE-2019-10343, Jenkins Configuration as Code Plugin 1.26 and earlier did not properly apply masking to some values expected to be hidden when logging the configuration being applied. |
| CVE-2019-10099 | High | 2019-08-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Prior to Spark 2.3.3, in certain situations Spark would write user data to local disk unencrypted, even if spark.io.encryption.enabled=true. This includes cached blocks that are fetched to disk (controlled by spark.maxRemoteBlockSizeFetchToMem); in SparkR, using parallelize; in Pyspark, using broadcast and parallelize; and use of python udfs. |
| CVE-2019-4473 | High | 2019-08-05 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Multiple binaries in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 7, 7R, and 8 on the AIX platform use insecure absolute RPATHs, which may facilitate code injection and privilege elevation by local users. IBM X-Force ID: 163984. |
| CVE-2019-10094 | High | 2019-08-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A carefully crafted package/compressed file that, when unzipped/uncompressed yields the same file (a quine), causes a StackOverflowError in Apache Tika's RecursiveParserWrapper in versions 1.7-1.21. Apache Tika users should upgrade to 1.22 or later. |
| CVE-2019-10093 | Medium | 2019-08-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | In Apache Tika 1.19 to 1.21, a carefully crafted 2003ml or 2006ml file could consume all available SAXParsers in the pool and lead to very long hangs. Apache Tika users should upgrade to 1.22 or later. |
| CVE-2019-10088 | High | 2019-08-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A carefully crafted or corrupt zip file can cause an OOM in Apache Tika's RecursiveParserWrapper in versions 1.7-1.21. Users should upgrade to 1.22 or later. |
| CVE-2018-10899 | High | 2019-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Jolokia versions from 1.2 to before 1.6.1. Affected versions are vulnerable to a system-wide CSRF. This holds true for properly configured instances with strict checking for origin and referrer headers. This could result in a Remote Code Execution attack. |
| CVE-2015-7559 | Low | 2019-08-01 | No exploit published | No public exploit | It was found that the Apache ActiveMQ client before 5.14.5 exposed a remote shutdown command in the ActiveMQConnection class. An attacker logged into a compromised broker could use this flaw to achieve denial of service on a connected client. |
| CVE-2019-10366 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Skytap Cloud CI Plugin 2.06 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10365 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Google Kubernetes Engine Plugin 0.6.2 and earlier created a temporary file containing a temporary access token in the project workspace, where it could be accessed by users with Job/Read permission. |
| CVE-2019-10364 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Amazon EC2 Plugin 1.43 and earlier wrote the beginning of private keys to the Jenkins system log. |
| CVE-2019-10363 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Configuration as Code Plugin 1.24 and earlier did not reliably identify sensitive values expected to be exported in their encrypted form. |
| CVE-2019-10362 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Configuration as Code Plugin 1.24 and earlier did not escape values resulting in variable interpolation during configuration import when exporting, allowing attackers with permission to change Jenkins system configuration to obtain the values of environment variables. |
| CVE-2019-10361 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Maven Release Plugin 0.14.0 and earlier stored credentials unencrypted on the Jenkins master where they could be viewed by users with access to the master file system. |
| CVE-2019-10360 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A stored cross site scripting vulnerability in Jenkins Maven Release Plugin 0.14.0 and earlier allowed attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript in the plugin-provided web pages in Jenkins. |
| CVE-2019-10359 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Maven Release Plugin 0.14.0 and earlier in the M2ReleaseAction#doSubmit method allowed attackers to perform releases with attacker-specified options. |
| CVE-2019-10358 | Medium | 2019-07-31 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Maven Integration Plugin 3.3 and earlier did not apply build log decorators to module builds, potentially revealing sensitive build variables in the build log. |