Overview 61 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 1 protected · 2 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 6 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
61matches
1in Waratek scope1.6%
1protected1.6%
2exploited3.3%
0CISA KEV0.0%
6public PoC9.8%
2EPSS ≥ 0.53.3%
Protected by Waratek
1
1.6%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
1.6%
Not applicable
59
96.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
1.6%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
60
98.4%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
3.3%
Working exploit published
4
6.6%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
55
90.2%
split by
peak 11 / year
20095
Not applicable5
Medium5
not blocked5
Working exploit published4
No public exploit1
20100
20112
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20120
20130
20141
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20150
20160
20170
20181
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
20190
20206
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
202111
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable10
Medium11
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked10
Exploited1
No public exploit10
20226
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20239
Not applicable9
Medium9
not blocked9
No public exploit9
20246
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20256
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20268
Not applicable8
Medium8
not blocked8
No public exploit8
201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-42408 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When BIG-IP DNS is provisioned, a vulnerability exists in an undisclosed TMOS Shell (tmsh) command that may allow a highly privileged authenticated attacker to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42063 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in iControl SOAP where an authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role can download sensitive files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42058 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker's undisclosed requests to BIG-IP iControl REST can lead to an information leak of BIG-IP local user account names. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41954 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive information disclosure vulnerability exists in the undisclosed iControl REST endpoint and TMOS Shell (tmsh) command which may allow an authenticated attacker with resource administrator role privileges to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40703 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the dashboard of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40435 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When configured, IP-based access restrictions for httpd do not cover all endpoints, which may allow connections from blocked addresses. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-34019 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is configured in Static and Dynamic routing protocols, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to stop processing BFD packets and cause the configured routing protocol to fail over. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-24464 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When running in Appliance mode, a directory traversal vulnerability exists in an undisclosed iControl REST endpoint that may allow an authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges to cross a security boundary and delete files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-59268 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On the BIG-IP system, undisclosed endpoints that contain static non-sensitive information are accessible to an unauthenticated remote attacker through the Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-58474 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When BIG-IP Advanced WAF is configured on a virtual server with Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection or when an NGINX server is configured with App Protect Bot Defense, undisclosed requests can disrupt new client requests. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-58424 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP systems, undisclosed traffic can cause data corruption and unauthorized data modification in protocols which do not have message integrity protection. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-54755 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A directory traversal vulnerability exists in TMUI that allows a highly privileged authenticated attacker to access files which are not limited to the intended files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-54500 | Medium | 2025-08-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An HTTP/2 implementation flaw allows a denial-of-service (DoS) that uses malformed HTTP/2 control frames in order to break the max concurrent streams limit (HTTP/2 MadeYouReset Attack). Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-24320 | Medium | 2025-02-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-31156 https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000138636 . Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2022-4539 | Medium | 2024-08-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Web Application Firewall plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to IP Address Spoofing in versions up to, and including, 2.1.2. This is due to insufficient restrictions on where the IP Address information is being retrieved for request logging and login restrictions. Attackers can supply the X-Forwarded-For header with with a different IP Address that will be logged and can be used to bypass settings that may have blocked out an IP address or country from logging in. |
| CVE-2024-41723 | Medium | 2024-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Undisclosed requests to BIG-IP iControl REST can lead to information leak of user account names. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2024-33604 | Medium | 2024-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exist in undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2024-32761 | Medium | 2024-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Under certain conditions, a data leak may occur in the Traffic Management Microkernels (TMMs) of BIG-IP tenants running on VELOS and rSeries platforms. This leak occurs randomly and cannot be deliberately triggered. If it occurs, it may leak up to 64 bytes of non-contiguous randomized bytes. Under rare conditions, this may lead to a TMM restart, affecting availability. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2024-28889 | Medium | 2024-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When an SSL profile with alert timeout is configured with a non-default value on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic along with conditions beyond the attacker's control can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2024-27202 | Medium | 2024-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A DOM-based cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-45219 | Medium | 2023-10-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Exposure of Sensitive Information vulnerability exist in an undisclosed BIG-IP TMOS shell (tmsh) command which may allow an authenticated attacker with resource administrator role privileges to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-43485 | Medium | 2023-10-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When TACACS+ audit forwarding is configured on BIG-IP or BIG-IQ system, sharedsecret is logged in plaintext in the audit log. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-41964 | Medium | 2023-10-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems do not encrypt some sensitive information written to Database (DB) variables. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-38423 | Medium | 2023-08-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-38419 | Medium | 2023-08-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker with guest privileges or higher can cause the iControl SOAP process to terminate by sending undisclosed requests. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-3470 | Medium | 2023-08-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Specific F5 BIG-IP platforms with Cavium Nitrox FIPS HSM cards generate a deterministic password for the Crypto User account. The predictable nature of the password allows an authenticated user with TMSH access to the BIG-IP system, or anyone with physical access to the FIPS HSM, the information required to generate the correct password. On vCMP systems, all Guests share the same deterministic password, allowing those with TMSH access on one Guest to access keys of a different Guest. The following BIG-IP hardware platforms are affected: 10350v-F, i5820-DF, i7820-DF, i15820-DF, 5250v-F, 7200v-F, 10200v-F, 6900-F, 8900-F, 11000-F, and 11050-F. The BIG-IP rSeries r5920-DF and r10920-DF are not affected, nor does the issue affect software FIPS implementations or network HSM configurations. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-28406 | Medium | 2023-05-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A directory traversal vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility which may allow an authenticated attacker to read files with .xml extension. Access to restricted information is limited and the attacker does not control what information is obtained. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-24594 | Medium | 2023-05-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When an SSL profile is configured on a Virtual Server, undisclosed traffic can cause an increase in CPU or SSL accelerator resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-41823 | Medium | 2023-01-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Kemp LoadMaster 7.2.54.1 allows certain uses of onmouseover to bypass an XSS protection mechanism. |
| CVE-2022-23031 | Medium | 2022-01-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP FPS, ASM, and Advanced WAF versions 16.1.x before 16.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.4, and 14.1.x before 14.1.4.4, an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall (Advanced WAF) and BIG-IP ASM Traffic Management User Interface (TMUI), also referred to as the Configuration utility, that allows an authenticated high-privileged attacker to read local files and force BIG-IP to send HTTP requests. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2022-23030 | Medium | 2022-01-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On version 16.1.x before 16.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.4.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.5, and all versions of 13.1.x, when the BIG-IP Virtual Edition (VE) uses the ixlv driver (which is used in SR-IOV mode and requires Intel X710/XL710/XXV710 family of network adapters on the Hypervisor) and TCP Segmentation Offload configuration is enabled, undisclosed requests may cause an increase in CPU resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2022-23029 | Medium | 2022-01-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP version 16.x before 16.1.0, 15.1.x before 15.1.4.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.4, and all versions of 13.1.x, 12.1.x, and 11.6.x, when a FastL4 profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2022-23027 | Medium | 2022-01-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP versions 15.1.x before 15.1.4, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.4, 13.1.x beginning in 13.1.3.6, 12.1.5.3-12.1.6, and 11.6.5.2, when a FastL4 profile and an HTTP, FIX, and/or hash persistence profile are configured on the same virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the virtual server to stop processing new client connections. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2022-23026 | Medium | 2022-01-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP ASM & Advanced WAF version 16.1.x before 16.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.4.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.5, and all versions of 13.1.x and 12.1.x, an authenticated user with low privileges, such as a guest, can upload data using an undisclosed REST endpoint causing an increase in disk resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2022-23023 | Medium | 2022-01-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP version 16.1.x before 16.1.2.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.5, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.5, and all versions of 13.1.x and 12.1.x, and BIG-IQ all versions of 8.x and 7.x, undisclosed requests by an authenticated iControl REST user can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-45105 | Medium | 2021-12-18 | Protected by Waratek | Exploited | Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. |
| CVE-2021-23053 | Medium | 2021-09-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On version 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.3.1, and 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, when the brute force protection feature of BIG-IP Advanced WAF or BIG-IP ASM is enabled on a virtual server and the virtual server is under brute force attack, the MySQL database may run out of disk space due to lack of row limit on undisclosed tables in the MYSQL database. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-23041 | Medium | 2021-09-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.2, 13.1.x before 13.1.4.1, and all versions of 12.1.x, a DOM based cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to execute JavaScript in the context of the current logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-23027 | Medium | 2021-09-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On version 16.0.x before 16.0.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.3.1, and 14.1.x before 14.1.4.3, a DOM based cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to execute JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-23007 | Medium | 2021-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP versions 14.1.4 and 16.0.1.1, when the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process handles certain undisclosed traffic, it may start dropping all fragmented IP traffic. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-23001 | Medium | 2021-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.3, the upload functionality in BIG-IP Advanced WAF and BIG-IP ASM allows an authenticated user to upload files to the BIG-IP system using a call to an undisclosed iControl REST endpoint. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-22998 | Medium | 2021-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.3, SYN flood protection thresholds are not enforced in secure network address translation (SNAT) listeners. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-22994 | Medium | 2021-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.3, undisclosed endpoints in iControl REST allow for a reflected XSS attack, which could lead to a complete compromise of the BIG-IP system if the victim user is granted the admin role. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-5948. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-22984 | Medium | 2021-02-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP Advanced WAF and ASM version 15.1.x before 15.1.0.2, 15.0.x before 15.0.1.4, 14.1.x before 14.1.2.5, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.4, 12.1.x before 12.1.5.2, and 11.6.x before 11.6.5.2, when receiving a unauthenticated client request with a maliciously crafted URI, a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM virtual server configured with a DoS profile with Proactive Bot Defense (versions prior to 14.1.0), or a Bot Defense profile (versions 14.1.0 and later), may subject clients and web servers to Open Redirection attacks. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-22981 | Medium | 2021-02-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On all versions of BIG-IP 12.1.x and 11.6.x, the original TLS protocol includes a weakness in the master secret negotiation that is mitigated by the Extended Master Secret (EMS) extension defined in RFC 7627. TLS connections that do not use EMS are vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks during renegotiation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2021-22979 | Medium | 2021-02-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP version 16.0.x before 16.0.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.2.8, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.5, and all 12.1.x versions, a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility when Fraud Protection Service is provisioned and allows an attacker to execute JavaScript in the context of the current logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Software Development (EoSD) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2020-27719 | Medium | 2020-12-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP 16.0.0-16.0.0.1, 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, and 14.1.0-14.1.3, a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. |
| CVE-2020-5947 | Medium | 2020-11-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1 and 15.1.0-15.1.1, on specific BIG-IP platforms, attackers may be able to obtain TCP sequence numbers from the BIG-IP system that can be reused in future connections with the same source and destination port and IP numbers. Only these platforms are affected: BIG-IP 2000 series (C112), BIG-IP 4000 series (C113), BIG-IP i2000 series (C117), BIG-IP i4000 series (C115), BIG-IP Virtual Edition (VE). |
| CVE-2020-5943 | Medium | 2020-11-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password. |
| CVE-2020-5938 | Medium | 2020-10-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, when negotiating IPSec tunnels with configured, authenticated peers, the peer may negotiate a different key length than the BIG-IP configuration would otherwise allow. |
| CVE-2020-5929 | Medium | 2020-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In versions 13.0.0-13.0.0 HF2, 12.1.0-12.1.2 HF1, and 11.6.1-11.6.2, BIG-IP platforms with Cavium Nitrox SSL hardware acceleration cards, a Virtual Server configured with a Client SSL profile, and using Anonymous (ADH) or Ephemeral (DHE) Diffie-Hellman key exchange and Single DH use option not enabled in the options list may be vulnerable to crafted SSL/TLS Handshakes that may result with a PMS (Pre-Master Secret) that starts in a 0 byte and may lead to a recovery of plaintext messages as BIG-IP TLS/SSL ADH/DHE sends different error messages acting as an oracle. Similar error messages when PMS starts with 0 byte coupled with very precise timing measurement observation may also expose this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2020-14210 | Medium | 2020-06-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in MONITORAPP WAF in which script can be executed when responding to Request URL information. It provides a function to response to Request URL information when blocking. |
| CVE-2018-3639 | Medium | 2018-05-22 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. |
| CVE-2011-4887 | Medium | 2014-09-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Violations Table in the management GUI in the MX Management Server in Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall (WAF) 9.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the username field. |
| CVE-2011-3140 | Medium | 2011-08-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Web Application Firewall, as used on the G400 IPS-G400-IB-1 and GX4004 IPS-GX4004-IB-2 appliances with update 31.030, does not properly handle query strings with multiple instances of the same parameter, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended intrusion prevention by dividing a dangerous parameter value into substrings, as demonstrated by a SQL statement that is split across multiple iid parameters and then sent to a .aspx file on an IIS web server. |
| CVE-2011-0767 | Medium | 2011-06-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the management GUI in the MX Management Server in Imperva SecureSphere Web Application Firewall 6.2, 7.x, and 8.x allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an HTTP request to a firewalled server, aka Bug ID 31759. |
| CVE-2009-3457 | Medium | 2009-09-29 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cisco ACE XML Gateway (AXG) and ACE Web Application Firewall (WAF) before 6.1 allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via an HTTP request that lacks a handler, as demonstrated by (1) an OPTIONS request or (2) a crafted GET request, leading to a Message-handling Errors message containing a certain client intranet IP address, aka Bug ID CSCtb82159. |
| CVE-2009-2299 | Medium | 2009-07-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Artofdefence Hyperguard Web Application Firewall (WAF) module before 2.5.5-11635, 3.0 before 3.0.3-11636, and 3.1 before 3.1.1-11637, a module for the Apache HTTP Server, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via an HTTP request with a large Content-Length value but no POST data. |
| CVE-2009-1593 | Medium | 2009-05-21 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Armorlogic Profense Web Application Firewall before 2.2.22, and 2.4.x before 2.4.4, does not properly implement the "negative model," which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a modified end tag of a SCRIPT element. |
| CVE-2009-0468 | Medium | 2009-02-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ajax.html in Profense Web Application Firewall 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) shutdown the server, (2) send ping packets, (3) enable network services, (4) configure a proxy server, and (5) modify other settings via parameters in the query string. |
| CVE-2009-0467 | Medium | 2009-02-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in proxy.html in Profense Web Application Firewall 2.6.2 and 2.6.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the proxy parameter in a deny_log manage action. |