Overview 35 matches · 2 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 2 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 3 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
35matches
2in Waratek scope5.7%
0protected0.0%
2exploited5.7%
0CISA KEV0.0%
3public PoC8.6%
2EPSS ≥ 0.55.7%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
2
5.7%
Outside Waratek scope
2
5.7%
Not applicable
31
88.6%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
35
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
5.7%
Working exploit published
1
2.9%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
32
91.4%
split by
peak 8 / year
20102
Not applicable2
Medium1
Low1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20110
20120
20138
Not applicable8
Medium4
Low4
not blocked8
No public exploit8
20143
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20152
Not applicable2
Medium1
Low1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20160
20173
Not applicable3
Critical2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20188
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable6
Critical3
High3
Medium2
not blocked8
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit6
20198
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable6
Critical1
High1
Medium5
Low1
not blocked8
Exploited1
No public exploit7
20200
20210
20221
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
2010201220142016201820202022
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3620 | Medium | 2022-03-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Ansible Engine's ansible-connection module, where sensitive information such as the Ansible user credentials is disclosed by default in the traceback error message. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. |
| CVE-2019-11135 | Medium | 2019-11-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | TSX Asynchronous Abort condition on some CPUs utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via a side channel with local access. |
| CVE-2009-3552 | Low | 2019-11-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In RHEV-M VDC 2.2.0, it was found that the SSL certificate was not verified when using the client-side Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager interface (a Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) XAML browser application) to connect to the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager. An attacker on the local network could use this flaw to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack, tricking the user into thinking they are viewing the Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager when the content is actually attacker-controlled, or modifying actions a user requested Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager to perform. |
| CVE-2013-0186 | Medium | 2019-11-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ManageIQ EVM allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2019-10744 | Critical | 2019-07-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Versions of lodash lower than 4.17.12 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The function defaultsDeep could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype using a constructor payload. |
| CVE-2019-10194 | Medium | 2019-07-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Sensitive passwords used in deployment and configuration of oVirt Metrics, all versions. were found to be insufficiently protected. Passwords could be disclosed in log files (if playbooks are run with -v) or in playbooks stored on Metrics or Bastion hosts. |
| CVE-2019-11358 | Medium | 2019-04-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. |
| CVE-2019-8331 | Medium | 2019-02-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Bootstrap before 3.4.1 and 4.3.x before 4.3.1, XSS is possible in the tooltip or popover data-template attribute. |
| CVE-2018-16881 | High | 2019-01-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A denial of service vulnerability was found in rsyslog in the imptcp module. An attacker could send a specially crafted message to the imptcp socket, which would cause rsyslog to crash. Versions before 8.27.0 are vulnerable. |
| CVE-2018-17963 | Critical | 2018-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | qemu_deliver_packet_iov in net/net.c in Qemu accepts packet sizes greater than INT_MAX, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact. |
| CVE-2018-17958 | High | 2018-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Qemu has a Buffer Overflow in rtl8139_do_receive in hw/net/rtl8139.c because an incorrect integer data type is used. |
| CVE-2017-7481 | Critical | 2018-07-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Ansible before versions 2.3.1.0 and 2.4.0.0 fails to properly mark lookup-plugin results as unsafe. If an attacker could control the results of lookup() calls, they could inject Unicode strings to be parsed by the jinja2 templating system, resulting in code execution. By default, the jinja2 templating language is now marked as 'unsafe' and is not evaluated. |
| CVE-2018-1072 | Critical | 2018-06-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | ovirt-engine before version ovirt 4.2.2 is vulnerable to an information exposure through log files. When engine-backup was run with one of the options "--provision*db", the database username and password were logged in cleartext. Sharing the provisioning log might inadvertently leak database passwords. |
| CVE-2018-3639 | Medium | 2018-05-22 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. |
| CVE-2018-8897 | High | 2018-05-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A statement in the System Programming Guide of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual (SDM) was mishandled in the development of some or all operating-system kernels, resulting in unexpected behavior for #DB exceptions that are deferred by MOV SS or POP SS, as demonstrated by (for example) privilege escalation in Windows, macOS, some Xen configurations, or FreeBSD, or a Linux kernel crash. The MOV to SS and POP SS instructions inhibit interrupts (including NMIs), data breakpoints, and single step trap exceptions until the instruction boundary following the next instruction (SDM Vol. 3A; section 6.8.3). (The inhibited data breakpoints are those on memory accessed by the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction itself.) Note that debug exceptions are not inhibited by the interrupt enable (EFLAGS.IF) system flag (SDM Vol. 3A; section 2.3). If the instruction following the MOV to SS or POP to SS instruction is an instruction like SYSCALL, SYSENTER, INT 3, etc. that transfers control to the operating system at CPL < 3, the debug exception is delivered after the transfer to CPL < 3 is complete. OS kernels may not expect this order of events and may therefore experience unexpected behavior when it occurs. |
| CVE-2013-0185 | High | 2018-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ManageIQ Enterprise Virtualization Manager (EVM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2018-1059 | Medium | 2018-04-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The DPDK vhost-user interface does not check to verify that all the requested guest physical range is mapped and contiguous when performing Guest Physical Addresses to Host Virtual Addresses translations. This may lead to a malicious guest exposing vhost-user backend process memory. All versions before 18.02.1 are vulnerable. |
| CVE-2015-7544 | Critical | 2017-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | redhat-support-plugin-rhev in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (aka RHEV Manager) before 3.6 allows remote authenticated users with the SuperUser role on any Entity to execute arbitrary commands on any host in the RHEV environment. |
| CVE-2015-5293 | Medium | 2017-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager 3.6 and earlier gives valid SLAAC IPv6 addresses to interfaces when "boot protocol" is set to None, which might allow remote attackers to communicate with a system designated to be unreachable. |
| CVE-2017-9214 | Critical | 2017-05-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Open vSwitch (OvS) 2.7.0, while parsing an OFPT_QUEUE_GET_CONFIG_REPLY type OFP 1.0 message, there is a buffer over-read that is caused by an unsigned integer underflow in the function `ofputil_pull_queue_get_config_reply10` in `lib/ofp-util.c`. |
| CVE-2015-0257 | Low | 2015-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 uses weak permissions on the directories shared by the ovirt-engine-dwhd service and a plugin during service startup, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading files in the directory. |
| CVE-2015-0237 | Medium | 2015-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 ignores the permission to deny snapshot creation during live storage migration between domains, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (prevent host start) by creating a long snapshot chain. |
| CVE-2014-3573 | Medium | 2014-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The oVirt Engine backend module, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager before 3.4.2, uses an "insecure DocumentBuilderFactory," which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files or possibly have other unspecified impact via a crafted XML/RSDL document, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. |
| CVE-2013-6434 | Medium | 2014-01-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The remote-viewer in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.3, when using a native SPICE client invocation method, initially makes insecure connections to the SPICE server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof the SPICE server. |
| CVE-2013-2050 | High | 2014-01-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in the miq_policy controller in Red Hat CloudForms 2.0 Management Engine (CFME) 5.1 and ManageIQ Enterprise Virtualization Manager 5.0 and earlier allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the profile[] parameter in an explorer action. |
| CVE-2013-2144 | Medium | 2013-07-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEVM) before 3.2 does not properly check permissions for the target storage domain, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (disk space consumption) by cloning a VM from a snapshot. |
| CVE-2013-0168 | Medium | 2013-03-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The MoveDisk command in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) 3.1 and earlier does not properly check permissions on storage domains, which allows remote authenticated storage admins to cause a denial of service (free space consumption of other storage domains) via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2012-6115 | Low | 2013-03-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The domain management tool (rhevm-manage-domains) in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) 3.1 and earlier, when the validate action is enabled, logs the administrative password to a world-readable log file, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading this file. |
| CVE-2012-5516 | Low | 2013-01-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.1, when moving disks between storage domains, does not properly wipe-after-delete, which prevents disks from being securely deleted and might allow local users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2012-2696 | Low | 2013-01-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The backend in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.1 does not properly check privileges, which allows remote authenticated users to query arbitrary information via a (1) SOAP or (2) GWT request. |
| CVE-2012-0861 | Medium | 2013-01-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The vds_installer in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.1, when adding a host, uses the -k curl parameter when downloading deployUtil.py and vds_bootstrap.py, which prevents SSL certificates from being validated and allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via a man-in-the-middle attack. |
| CVE-2012-0860 | Medium | 2013-01-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.1, when adding a host, allow local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse (1) deployUtil.py or (2) vds_bootstrap.py Python module in /tmp/. |
| CVE-2011-4316 | Low | 2013-01-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.1, in certain unspecified conditions, does not lock the desktop screen between SPICE sessions, which allows local users with access to a virtual machine to gain access to other users' desktop sessions via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2010-2793 | Medium | 2010-12-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Race condition in the SPICE (aka spice-activex) plug-in for Internet Explorer in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 2.2.4 allows local users to create a certain named pipe, and consequently gain privileges, via vectors involving knowledge of the name of this named pipe, in conjunction with use of the ImpersonateNamedPipeClient function. |
| CVE-2010-2224 | Low | 2010-06-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The snapshot merging functionality in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (aka RHEV-M) before 2.2 does not properly pass the postzero parameter during operations on deleted volumes, which allows guest OS users to obtain sensitive information by examining the disk blocks associated with a deleted virtual machine. |