Overview 18 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 2 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
18matches
1in Waratek scope5.6%
0protected0.0%
2exploited11.1%
0CISA KEV0.0%
2public PoC11.1%
2EPSS ≥ 0.511.1%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
5.6%
Outside Waratek scope
2
11.1%
Not applicable
15
83.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
18
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
11.1%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
16
88.9%
split by
peak 5 / year
20101
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20110
20120
20134
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20142
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20161
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20171
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20182
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Medium2
not blocked2
Exploited1
No public exploit1
20195
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable3
Medium5
not blocked5
Exploited1
No public exploit4
20200
20210
20221
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
2010201220142016201820202022
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3620 | Medium | 2022-03-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Ansible Engine's ansible-connection module, where sensitive information such as the Ansible user credentials is disclosed by default in the traceback error message. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. |
| CVE-2019-11135 | Medium | 2019-11-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | TSX Asynchronous Abort condition on some CPUs utilizing speculative execution may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via a side channel with local access. |
| CVE-2013-0186 | Medium | 2019-11-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ManageIQ EVM allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2019-10194 | Medium | 2019-07-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Sensitive passwords used in deployment and configuration of oVirt Metrics, all versions. were found to be insufficiently protected. Passwords could be disclosed in log files (if playbooks are run with -v) or in playbooks stored on Metrics or Bastion hosts. |
| CVE-2019-11358 | Medium | 2019-04-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. |
| CVE-2019-8331 | Medium | 2019-02-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Bootstrap before 3.4.1 and 4.3.x before 4.3.1, XSS is possible in the tooltip or popover data-template attribute. |
| CVE-2018-3639 | Medium | 2018-05-22 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. |
| CVE-2018-1059 | Medium | 2018-04-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The DPDK vhost-user interface does not check to verify that all the requested guest physical range is mapped and contiguous when performing Guest Physical Addresses to Host Virtual Addresses translations. This may lead to a malicious guest exposing vhost-user backend process memory. All versions before 18.02.1 are vulnerable. |
| CVE-2015-5293 | Medium | 2017-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager 3.6 and earlier gives valid SLAAC IPv6 addresses to interfaces when "boot protocol" is set to None, which might allow remote attackers to communicate with a system designated to be unreachable. |
| CVE-2016-5709 | Medium | 2016-06-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SolarWinds Virtualization Manager 6.3.1 and earlier uses weak encryption to store passwords in /etc/shadow, which allows local users with superuser privileges to obtain user passwords via a brute force attack. |
| CVE-2015-0237 | Medium | 2015-05-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 3.5.1 ignores the permission to deny snapshot creation during live storage migration between domains, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (prevent host start) by creating a long snapshot chain. |
| CVE-2014-3573 | Medium | 2014-10-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The oVirt Engine backend module, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager before 3.4.2, uses an "insecure DocumentBuilderFactory," which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files or possibly have other unspecified impact via a crafted XML/RSDL document, related to an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. |
| CVE-2013-6434 | Medium | 2014-01-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The remote-viewer in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.3, when using a native SPICE client invocation method, initially makes insecure connections to the SPICE server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof the SPICE server. |
| CVE-2013-2144 | Medium | 2013-07-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEVM) before 3.2 does not properly check permissions for the target storage domain, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (disk space consumption) by cloning a VM from a snapshot. |
| CVE-2013-0168 | Medium | 2013-03-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The MoveDisk command in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) 3.1 and earlier does not properly check permissions on storage domains, which allows remote authenticated storage admins to cause a denial of service (free space consumption of other storage domains) via unspecified vectors. |
| CVE-2012-0861 | Medium | 2013-01-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The vds_installer in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.1, when adding a host, uses the -k curl parameter when downloading deployUtil.py and vds_bootstrap.py, which prevents SSL certificates from being validated and allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Python code via a man-in-the-middle attack. |
| CVE-2012-0860 | Medium | 2013-01-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple untrusted search path vulnerabilities in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.1, when adding a host, allow local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse (1) deployUtil.py or (2) vds_bootstrap.py Python module in /tmp/. |
| CVE-2010-2793 | Medium | 2010-12-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Race condition in the SPICE (aka spice-activex) plug-in for Internet Explorer in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) Manager before 2.2.4 allows local users to create a certain named pipe, and consequently gain privileges, via vectors involving knowledge of the name of this named pipe, in conjunction with use of the ImpersonateNamedPipeClient function. |