Overview 48 matches · 6 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
48matches
6in Waratek scope12.5%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
6
12.5%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
42
87.5%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
48
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
6
12.5%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
42
87.5%
split by
peak 10 / year
20071
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20080
20090
20100
20110
20120
20130
20141
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20150
20160
20178
Not applicable8
Medium8
not blocked8
No public exploit8
20182
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20193
Not applicable3
Critical1
High1
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20209
No exploit published2
Not applicable7
Critical2
High4
Medium3
not blocked9
No public exploit9
20212
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20222
Not applicable2
Critical1
High1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20234
Not applicable4
High2
Medium2
not blocked4
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit2
202410
No exploit published1
Not applicable9
Critical1
High6
Medium3
not blocked10
No public exploit10
20255
No exploit published1
Not applicable4
High2
Medium3
not blocked5
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit2
20261
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-15104 | Medium | 2026-01-16 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Nu Html Checker (validator.nu) contains a restriction bypass that allows remote attackers to make the server perform arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests to internal resources, including localhost services. While the validator implements hostname-based protections to block direct access to localhost and 127.0.0.1, these controls can be bypassed using DNS rebinding techniques or domains that resolve to loopback addresses.This issue affects The Nu Html Checker (vnu): latest (commit 23f090a11bab8d0d4e698f1ffc197a4fe226a9cd). |
| CVE-2025-12758 | High | 2025-11-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Versions of the package validator before 13.15.22 are vulnerable to Incomplete Filtering of One or More Instances of Special Elements in the isLength() function that does not take into account Unicode variation selectors (\uFE0F, \uFE0E) appearing in a sequence which lead to improper string length calculation. This can lead to an application using isLength for input validation accepting strings significantly longer than intended, resulting in issues like data truncation in databases, buffer overflows in other system components, or denial-of-service. |
| CVE-2025-56200 | Medium | 2025-09-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A URL validation bypass vulnerability exists in validator.js through version 13.15.15. The isURL() function uses '://' as a delimiter to parse protocols, while browsers use ':' as the delimiter. This parsing difference allows attackers to bypass protocol and domain validation by crafting URLs leading to XSS and Open Redirect attacks. |
| CVE-2025-35036 | Medium | 2025-06-03 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | Hibernate Validator before 6.2.0 and 7.0.0, by default and depending how it is used, may interpolate user-supplied input in a constraint violation message with Expression Language. This could allow an attacker to access sensitive information or execute arbitrary Java code. Hibernate Validator as of 6.2.0 and 7.0.0 no longer interpolates custom constraint violation messages with Expression Language and strongly recommends not allowing user-supplied input in constraint violation messages. CVE-2020-5245 and CVE-2025-4428 are examples of related, downstream vulnerabilities involving Expression Language intepolation of user-supplied data. |
| CVE-2025-1781 | High | 2025-03-28 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | There is a XXE in W3CSS Validator versions before cssval-20250226 that allows an attacker to use specially-crafted XML objects to coerce server-side request forgery (SSRF). This could be exploited to read arbitrary local files if an attacker has access to exception messages. |
| CVE-2024-13339 | Medium | 2025-02-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The DeBounce Email Validator plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.8.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'debounce_email_validator' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CVE-2024-56375 | High | 2024-12-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences (and, shortly afterwards, writes to) this array during a shuffle attempt, before the validation that would normally reject it when empty. This out-of-bounds access is caused by an integer underflow that causes the surrounding loop to iterate infinitely. Because the product is permanently stuck attempting to overshuffle an array that doesn't actually exist, a crash is nearly guaranteed. |
| CVE-2024-56170 | Medium | 2024-12-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent replays, accidental or otherwise. Manifests contain the manifestNumber and thisUpdate fields, which can be used to gauge the relevance of a given manifest, when compared to other manifests. The former is a serial-like sequential number, and the latter is the date on which the manifest was created. However, the product does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached manifest. As such, it's prone to a rollback to a previous version if it's served a valid outdated manifest. This leads to outdated route origin validation. |
| CVE-2024-56169 | Medium | 2024-12-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties (such as Fort) are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently uses its cache merely as a bandwidth saving tool (because fetching is performed through deltas). If a fetch fails midway or yields incorrect files, there is no viable fallback. This leads to incomplete route origin validation data. |
| CVE-2023-1932 | Medium | 2024-11-07 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in hibernate-validator's 'isValid' method in the org.hibernate.validator.internal.constraintvalidators.hv.SafeHtmlValidator class, which can be bypassed by omitting the tag ending in a less-than character. Browsers may render an invalid html, allowing HTML injection or Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) attacks. |
| CVE-2024-45239 | High | 2024-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a null eContent field. Fort dereferences the pointer without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing. |
| CVE-2024-45238 | High | 2024-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a resource certificate containing a bit string that doesn't properly decode into a Subject Public Key. OpenSSL does not report this problem during parsing, and when compiled with OpenSSL libcrypto versions below 3, Fort recklessly dereferences the pointer. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing. |
| CVE-2024-45237 | Critical | 2024-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a resource certificate containing a Key Usage extension composed of more than two bytes of data. Fort writes this string into a 2-byte buffer without properly sanitizing its length, leading to a buffer overflow. |
| CVE-2024-45236 | High | 2024-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a signed object containing an empty signedAttributes field. Fort accesses the set's elements without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing. |
| CVE-2024-45235 | High | 2024-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) a resource certificate containing an Authority Key Identifier extension that lacks the keyIdentifier field. Fort references this pointer without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a crash can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing. |
| CVE-2024-45234 | High | 2024-08-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort's BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics when faced with data not encoded in DER. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a panic can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing. |
| CVE-2023-45813 | High | 2023-10-18 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Torbot is an open source tor network intelligence tool. In affected versions the `torbot.modules.validators.validate_link function` uses the python-validators URL validation regex. This particular regular expression has an exponential complexity which allows an attacker to cause an application crash using a well-crafted argument. An attacker can use a well-crafted URL argument to exploit the vulnerability in the regular expression and cause a Denial of Service on the system. The validators file has been removed in version 4.0.0. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-4376 | Medium | 2023-09-19 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The Serial Codes Generator and Validator with WooCommerce Support WordPress plugin before 2.4.15 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
| CVE-2022-47925 | High | 2023-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The validate JSON endpoint of the Secvisogram csaf-validator-service in versions < 0.1.0 processes tests with unexpected names. This insufficient input validation of requests by an unauthenticated remote user might lead to a partial DoS of the service. Only the request of the attacker is affected by this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2022-47924 | Medium | 2023-03-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An high privileged attacker may pass crafted arguments to the validate function of csaf-validator-lib of a locally installed Secvisogram in versions < 0.1.0 wich can result in arbitrary code execution and DoS once the users triggers the validation. |
| CVE-2021-4295 | Critical | 2022-12-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in ONC code-validator-api up to 1.0.30. This vulnerability affects the function vocabularyValidationConfigurations of the file src/main/java/org/sitenv/vocabularies/configuration/CodeValidatorApiConfiguration.java of the component XML Handler. The manipulation leads to xml external entity reference. Upgrading to version 1.0.31 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is fbd8ea121755a2d3d116b13f235bc8b61d8449af. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. VDB-217018 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2021-40901 | High | 2022-06-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDOS) vulnerability was discovered in scniro-validator v1.0.1 when validating crafted invalid emails. |
| CVE-2021-43114 | High | 2021-11-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | FORT Validator versions prior to 1.5.2 will crash if an RPKI CA publishes an X.509 EE certificate. This will lead to RTR clients such as BGP routers to lose access to the RPKI VRP data set, effectively disabling Route Origin Validation. |
| CVE-2021-3765 | High | 2021-11-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | validator.js is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity |
| CVE-2020-7779 | High | 2020-11-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of package djvalidator are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) by sending crafted invalid emails - for example, --@------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!. |
| CVE-2020-7767 | Medium | 2020-11-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | All versions of package express-validators are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when validating specifically-crafted invalid urls. |
| CVE-2020-17479 | Critical | 2020-08-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | jpv (aka Json Pattern Validator) before 2.2.2 does not properly validate input, as demonstrated by a corrupted array. |
| CVE-2020-16164 | High | 2020-07-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in RIPE NCC RPKI Validator 3.x through 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28. It allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions or to cause a denial of service on dependent routing systems by strategically withholding RPKI Route Origin Authorisation ".roa" files or X509 Certificate Revocation List files from the RPKI relying party's view. NOTE: some third parties may regard this as a preferred behavior, not a vulnerability |
| CVE-2020-16163 | Critical | 2020-07-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in RIPE NCC RPKI Validator 3.x before 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28. RRDP fetches proceed even with a lack of validation of a TLS HTTPS endpoint. This allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions, or to trigger denial of service to traffic directed to co-dependent routing systems. NOTE: third parties assert that the behavior is intentionally permitted by RFC 8182 |
| CVE-2020-16162 | High | 2020-07-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in RIPE NCC RPKI Validator 3.x through 3.1-2020.07.06.14.28. Missing validation checks on CRL presence or CRL staleness in the X509-based RPKI certificate-tree validation procedure allow remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by using revoked certificates. NOTE: there may be counterarguments related to backwards compatibility |
| CVE-2020-9309 | High | 2020-07-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Silverstripe CMS through 4.5 can be susceptible to script execution from malicious upload contents under allowed file extensions (for example HTML code in a TXT file). When these files are stored as protected or draft files, the MIME detection can cause browsers to execute the file contents. Uploads stored as protected or draft files are allowed by default for authorised users only, but can also be enabled through custom logic as well as modules such as silverstripe/userforms. Sites using the previously optional silverstripe/mimevalidator module can configure MIME whitelists rather than extension whitelists, and hence prevent this issue. Sites on the Common Web Platform (CWP) use this module by default, and are not affected. |
| CVE-2020-4070 | Medium | 2020-06-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In CSS Validator less than or equal to commit 54d68a1, there is a cross-site scripting vulnerability in handling URIs. A user would have to click on a specifically crafted validator link to trigger it. This has been patched in commit e5c09a9. |
| CVE-2020-10693 | Medium | 2020-05-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Hibernate Validator version 6.1.2.Final. A bug in the message interpolation processor enables invalid EL expressions to be evaluated as if they were valid. This flaw allows attackers to bypass input sanitation (escaping, stripping) controls that developers may have put in place when handling user-controlled data in error messages. |
| CVE-2019-19588 | High | 2019-12-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The validators package 0.12.2 through 0.12.5 for Python enters an infinite loop when validators.domain is called with a crafted domain string. This is fixed in 0.12.6. |
| CVE-2019-19507 | Medium | 2019-12-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In jpv (aka Json Pattern Validator) before 2.1.1, compareCommon() can be bypassed because certain internal attributes can be overwritten via a conflicting name, as demonstrated by 'constructor': {'name':'Array'}. This affects validate(). Hence, a crafted payload can overwrite this builtin attribute to manipulate the type detection result. |
| CVE-2019-18413 | Critical | 2019-10-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In TypeStack class-validator 0.10.2, validate() input validation can be bypassed because certain internal attributes can be overwritten via a conflicting name. Even though there is an optional forbidUnknownValues parameter that can be used to reduce the risk of this bypass, this option is not documented and thus most developers configure input validation in the vulnerable default manner. With this vulnerability, attackers can launch SQL Injection or XSS attacks by injecting arbitrary malicious input. NOTE: a software maintainer agrees with the "is not documented" finding but suggests that much of the responsibility for the risk lies in a different product. |
| CVE-2015-7598 | High | 2018-03-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SafeNet Authentication Service TokenValidator Proxy Agent uses a weak ACL for unspecified installation directories and executable modules, which allows local users to gain privileges by modifying an executable module. |
| CVE-2017-9274 | High | 2018-03-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A shell command injection in the obs-service-source_validator before 0.7 could be used to execute code as the packager when checking RPM SPEC files with specific macro constructs. |
| CVE-2017-12802 | Medium | 2017-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The EBML_IntegerValue function in ebmlnumber.c in libebml2 through 2012-08-26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assert fault) via a crafted mkv file. |
| CVE-2017-12801 | Medium | 2017-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The UpdateDataSize function in ebmlmaster.c in libebml2 through 2012-08-26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assert fault) via a crafted mkv file. |
| CVE-2017-12800 | Medium | 2017-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The EBML_FindNextElement function in ebmlmain.c in libebml2 through 2012-08-26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Null pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted mkv file. |
| CVE-2017-12783 | Medium | 2017-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The ReadDataFloat function in ebmlnumber.c in libebml2 through 2012-08-26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assert fault) via a crafted mkv file. |
| CVE-2017-12782 | Medium | 2017-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The ReadData function in ebmlmaster.c in libebml2 through 2012-08-26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assert fault) via a crafted mkv file. |
| CVE-2017-12781 | Medium | 2017-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The EBML_BufferToID function in ebmlelement.c in libebml2 through 2012-08-26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Null pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted mkv file. |
| CVE-2017-12780 | Medium | 2017-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The ReadData function in ebmlstring.c in libebml2 through 2012-08-26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid free and application crash) via a crafted mkv file. |
| CVE-2017-12779 | Medium | 2017-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Node_GetData function in corec/corec/node/node.c in mkvalidator 0.5.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (Null pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted mkv file. |
| CVE-2014-3558 | Medium | 2014-09-30 | No exploit published | No public exploit | ReflectionHelper (org.hibernate.validator.util.ReflectionHelper) in Hibernate Validator 4.1.0 before 4.2.1, 4.3.x before 4.3.2, and 5.x before 5.1.2 allows attackers to bypass Java Security Manager (JSM) restrictions and execute restricted reflection calls via a crafted application. |
| CVE-2007-3696 | High | 2007-07-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CA ERwin Data Model Validator (formerly AllFusion Data Model Validator) allows remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (application hang) via a malformed .EXP database file and (2) cause a denial of service (aaplication crash) via a crafted .EXP database file, which triggers a NULL dereference. |