Overview 2,223 matches · 119 in Waratek scope · 19 protected · 15 exploited · 8 CISA KEV · 114 public PoC · 25 EPSS ≥ 0.5
2,223matches
119in Waratek scope5.4%
19protected0.9%
15exploited0.7%
8CISA KEV0.4%
114public PoC5.1%
25EPSS ≥ 0.51.1%
Protected by Waratek
19
0.9%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
5
0.2%
No exploit published
95
4.3%
Outside Waratek scope
81
3.6%
Not applicable
2,023
91.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
19
0.9%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
2,204
99.1%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 217 / year
20006
Not applicable6
Medium6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
20010
20028
Not applicable8
Medium8
not blocked8
Working exploit published1
No public exploit7
20034
Not applicable4
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
200416
Not applicable16
Medium16
not blocked16
Working exploit published5
No public exploit11
200521
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable20
Medium21
not blocked21
Working exploit published1
No public exploit20
200638
Not applicable38
Medium38
not blocked38
Working exploit published13
No public exploit25
200739
Not applicable39
Medium39
not blocked39
Working exploit published7
Forecast only1
No public exploit31
200818
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable17
Medium18
not blocked18
Working exploit published2
No public exploit16
200939
Not applicable39
Medium39
not blocked39
Working exploit published12
Forecast only1
No public exploit26
201017
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable15
Medium17
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked16
Working exploit published2
No public exploit15
201113
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable12
Medium13
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked12
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit10
201297
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Not applicable94
Medium97
not blocked97
Working exploit published7
Forecast only11
No public exploit79
201357
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published1
Not applicable55
Medium57
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked56
Working exploit published2
No public exploit55
2014121
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable117
Medium121
not blocked121
Exploited3
Working exploit published3
No public exploit115
201579
No exploit published2
Not applicable77
Medium79
not blocked79
Working exploit published3
No public exploit76
201662
Not applicable62
Medium62
not blocked62
Working exploit published2
No public exploit60
2017133
No exploit published2
Not applicable131
Medium133
not blocked133
Working exploit published11
No public exploit122
2018151
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable143
Medium151
not blocked151
Exploited1
Working exploit published6
No public exploit144
2019182
Protected by Waratek5
Mitigation candidate2
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable163
Medium182
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked177
Working exploit published2
No public exploit180
2020211
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable192
Medium211
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked210
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit207
2021217
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope12
Not applicable199
Medium217
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked215
Exploited3
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit208
2022162
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published9
Outside Waratek scope5
Not applicable147
Medium162
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked161
Exploited1
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit153
2023149
Protected by Waratek4
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published11
Outside Waratek scope10
Not applicable123
Medium149
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked145
Exploited1
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only21
No public exploit122
2024152
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable132
Medium152
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked150
Exploited2
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only24
No public exploit123
2025102
No exploit published11
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable90
Medium102
not blocked102
Exploited1
Proof of concept only25
No public exploit76
2026129
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published28
Outside Waratek scope16
Not applicable84
Medium129
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked128
Exploited1
Proof of concept only17
No public exploit111
200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-78407 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2026-78399 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service using a specially crafted HTTP query due to improper allocation of system resources |
| CVE-2026-19878 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass additional authentication workflow steps. |
| CVE-2026-16830 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify data and cause a denial of service due to an SQL injection vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-12091 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a denial of service due to a heap-based out-of-bounds read. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted request that causes a limited out‑of‑bounds memory read. |
| CVE-2026-11939 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 may be vulnerable to audit log forgery. |
| CVE-2026-11936 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 local management interface in certain configurations is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2026-94251 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Apache Sling Security Bundle: ContentDispositionFilter mediates only one address/API shape of a resource This issue affects Apache Sling Security Bundle: before 1.3.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.12, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-63451 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. From 8.0.0 until 8.0.6, a locally supplied detection rule that combines frame inspection without content and a transformed match without content can make src/detect-engine-prefilter.c select multiple non-prefilter frame engines while preparing signatures for non-prefilter inspection. Loading the crafted rule, including in test mode, can trigger a heap buffer overflow and crash Suricata; network traffic alone cannot reach the flaw. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6. |
| CVE-2026-63450 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 8.0.6, the FTP parser in src/app-layer-ftp.c treats a RETR or STOR command sent before PORT or PASV negotiation as a fatal application-layer error instead of a recoverable protocol event. The fatal state disables FTP application-layer parsing for the remainder of the TCP flow, so later commands can evade parser-dependent rules and logging; IPS mode instead drops the flow. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6. |
| CVE-2026-63449 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. From 8.0.0 until 8.0.6, the SIP parser in rust/src/sip/parser.rs stores request and response body lengths in 16-bit fields. A SIP body larger than 65,536 bytes can truncate the length and prevent frame:request.body or frame:response.body from exposing the complete body to inspection, allowing content in the omitted portion to evade frame-based detection. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6. |
| CVE-2026-57229 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. From 8.0.0 until 8.0.6, the SMTP MIME parser in rust/src/mime/smtp.rs does not fully reset state when processing Content-Type: message/rfc822 encapsulation. An outer MIME part's encoding or filename state can leak into the inner message, allowing crafted mail to evade detections based on file.data, file.name, or extracted URLs when SMTP MIME decoding is enabled. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6. |
| CVE-2026-57226 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.17 and 8.0.6, HTTP SWF decompression with the non-default swf-decompression feature and an unsafe decompress-depth can use the configured depth when allocating in src/util-file-decompression.c instead of limiting the allocation to the Flash file's actual data requirement. A crafted SWF response can therefore trigger an integer-related heap buffer overflow and crash Suricata; the default disabled feature and default depth are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 8.0.6 and 7.0.17. |
| CVE-2026-57225 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. From 8.0.0 until 8.0.6, src/datasets-context-json.c assumes that a configured JSON or NDJSON dataset value_key resolves to a string. A trusted or untrusted dataset or rule feed containing a non-string value for that key can cause a NULL pointer dereference during startup, configuration test mode, or rule reload, crashing Suricata before traffic processing. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6. |
| CVE-2026-57224 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. From 8.0.0 until 8.0.6, the DHCP parser in rust/src/dhcp/dhcp.rs creates stateless transactions without recording their packet direction with AppLayerTxData::for_direction(), so a sensor that observes only one direction cannot mark the unseen direction inspected or free completed transactions. The RDP parser in rust/src/rdp/rdp.rs has the same direction-state defect. The per-flow transaction list can grow without bound and cleanup repeatedly scans it, causing increasing CPU and memory consumption and eventual denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6. |
| CVE-2026-57222 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.17 and 8.0.6, crafted IPv4 and IPv6 address pairs can collide in the IPPair hash because src/ippair.c did not compare the IP address family before reusing IPPair-backed state. This can apply state from one IP family to another for xbits track ip_pair, FTP data expectations, and, on the 7.0 release line, thresholding, detection_filter, and rate_filter rules using track by_both, causing incorrect detection state. This issue is fixed in versions 8.0.6 and 7.0.17. |
| CVE-2026-54147 | Medium | 2026-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | http4k is a functional toolkit for Kotlin HTTP applications. Prior to 4.51.0.0, 5.42.0.0, and 6.50.0.0, DigestAuthProvider.verify in http4k-security-digest ignores its configured algorithm parameter and verifies every Digest response with hardcoded MD5. Deployments configured for SHA-256 therefore receive weaker MD5-based verification, exposing Digest authentication to collision-related attack paths that depend on the hash function's collision resistance. This issue is fixed in versions 4.51.0.0, 5.42.0.0, and 6.50.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-45767 | Medium | 2026-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to versions 7.0.16 and 8.0.5, a malicious rule could potentially overwrite any file on the file system on rule load or reload. Versions 7.0.16 and 8.0.5 fix the issue. Some workarounds are available. Preprocess `load`+ `save` rules to disallow absolute filenames for save, use Suricata's privilege dropping to limit writable files, and/or configure landlock in suricata.yaml. |
| CVE-2026-45763 | Medium | 2026-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Starting in version 8.0.0 and prior to version 8.0.5, when Lua rule execution is enabled, the Lua sandbox memory limit was not consistently enforced for new allocations. Certain Lua allocation patterns could exceed `security.lua.max-bytes` without triggering the intended memory limit, making the configured sandbox limit unreliable. This requires Lua rules to be enabled and an affected Lua script/rule to be loaded. Version 8.0.5 contains a fix. As a workaround, disable `security.lua.allow-rules` unless Lua rules are required. |
| CVE-2026-45752 | Medium | 2026-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Starting in version 8.0.0 and prior to version 8.0.5, when certain detection transforms are chained, the decompress transform pipeline could read from an inspection buffer after it had been reallocated and freed. The issue is reached during network traffic processing, but requires a malicious rule as Suricata will crash whatever the traffic. Version 8.0.5 contains a fix. As a workaround, avoid rules that chain `gunzip` or `zlib_deflate` with `max-size` bigger than 4096 after another transform. |
| CVE-2026-84659 | Medium | 2026-09-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1412.v7737b_3405f86 and earlier does not enforce a permission check in the method that controls the "Force the use of the sandbox globally in the system" setting, allowing attackers to disable it through Stapler data binding. |
| CVE-2026-84658 | Medium | 2026-09-02 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1412.v7737b_3405f86 and earlier uses the `@DataBoundConstructor` annotation on a constructor that loads script approval configuration, allowing attackers able to submit certain forms to read that configuration. |
| CVE-2026-59277 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security's InetAddressMatchers utility provides matchInternal() and matchExternal() builders for constructing an InetAddressMatcher that classifies a given IP address as belonging to an internal (private) or external (public) network. Spring Security 7.1.0 |
| CVE-2026-59276 | Medium | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Several components in Spring Security compare security-sensitive values using standard string equality (String.equals()) rather than a constant-time comparison. Because String.equals() returns as soon as it finds a differing character, the time taken to reject an incorrect value is proportional to the number of leading characters that match the expected value. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 Spring Security 6.5.0 - 6.5.11 Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.18 Spring Security 5.8.0 - 5.8.27 Spring Security 5.7.0 - 5.7.25 |
| CVE-2026-47842 | Medium | 2026-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Applications using AesBytesEncryptor with the two-argument constructor or when passing a null IV generator and CBC as the encryption mode encrypt data with AES/CBC using a null (all-zero) initialization vector. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 Spring Security 6.5.0 - 6.5.11 Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.18 Spring Security 5.8.0 - 5.8.27 Spring Security 5.7.0 - 5.7.25 |
| CVE-2026-76390 | Medium | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cisco Talos Intelligence for Enterprise Security Cloud versions below 1.0.3, an unauthenticated user could access the add-on OpenAPI specification through Splunk Web static file paths. The exposed specification could allow for reconnaissance of the add-on Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoints and authentication model. The vulnerability is possible because the generated OpenAPI specification is packaged in a static file path that Splunk Web serves without authentication. For more information see Deploy Cisco Talos Intelligence for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.0/introduction/deploy-cisco-talos-intelligence-for-splunk-enterprise-security-cloud-only) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-19639 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper access control vulnerability exists where an authenticated non-administrative application user could potentially view settings outside of their assigned scope. |
| CVE-2026-19636 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was identified in which CSRF tokens were generated using a predictable method, potentially reducing their effectiveness as a security control. This has been addressed by improving the randomness and entropy of token generation. |
| CVE-2026-19631 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A SQL injection vulnerability exists in Security Center that could allow an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary SQL queries, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive data, including credentials. |
| CVE-2026-66010 | Medium | 2026-07-24 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify before 3.4.12 fails to execute afterSanitizeElements hook for custom elements allowed via CUSTOM_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagNameCheck, allowing attributes to bypass application security policies. Attackers can preserve sensitive attributes on custom elements that later re-inject them into innerHTML sinks, creating second-order XSS gadgets. |
| CVE-2026-65914 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a mutation-XSS vulnerability when sanitized HTML is reinserted into special parsing contexts using innerHTML with wrappers like script, xmp, iframe, noembed, noframes, or noscript. Attackers can craft payloads with closing sequences that break out of the wrapper context during reparsing, reactivating dangerous markup with event handlers to execute JavaScript. |
| CVE-2026-65913 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in USE_PROFILES mode that allows attackers to bypass attribute filtering by polluting Array.prototype properties. Attackers can set Array.prototype properties like onclick to true, causing DOMPurify to accept event handlers as allowlisted attributes and resulting in DOM-based XSS when sanitized markup is rendered. |
| CVE-2026-65912 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a URI validation bypass vulnerability when ADD_ATTR is provided as a predicate function via EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeCheck. Attackers can supply a predicate that accepts specific attribute and tag combinations to bypass URI-safe validation, allowing unsafe protocols like javascript: to survive sanitization and execute as DOM-based XSS when the link is activated. |
| CVE-2026-65911 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In DOMPurify through 3.3.3, function predicates supplied via ADD_ATTR or ADD_TAGS to DOMPurify.sanitize() persist in internal state (EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING) across subsequent sanitize() calls on the same instance. If a later call on the same instance provides ADD_ATTR or ADD_TAGS as an array rather than a function, the previously set function handler is neither cleared nor overwritten, so it continues to approve attacker-controlled attributes or tags. This can allow dangerous event-handler attributes or forbidden tags (bypassing FORBID_TAGS) to survive sanitization, resulting in cross-site scripting. The vendor (Cure53) considers this an edge case outside DOMPurify's threat model; the referenced advisory lists 3.4.0 as the patched version. |
| CVE-2026-65903 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify before 3.4.0 contains a logic error in the ADD_TAGS function where short-circuit evaluation allows forbidden tags to bypass FORBID_TAGS restrictions. Attackers can craft input containing tags listed in FORBID_TAGS that are also added via ADD_TAGS function, causing them to be retained in sanitized output. |
| CVE-2026-65902 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify before 3.4.7 passes direct references to the module-level DEFAULT_ALLOWED_TAGS and DEFAULT_ALLOWED_ATTR sets to the uponSanitizeElement and uponSanitizeAttribute hooks via data.allowedTags / data.allowedAttributes when sanitize is called without an explicit cfg.ALLOWED_TAGS / cfg.ALLOWED_ATTR array. A hook that mutates these fields permanently widens the default allow-lists for the lifetime of the DOMPurify instance, so all subsequent default-config sanitize calls inherit the widened defaults and attacker payloads using the poisoned tag/attribute name survive sanitization. removeAllHooks(), clearConfig(), and passing a fresh cfg do not recover the state; only constructing a new DOMPurify instance does. |
| CVE-2026-65901 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify through 3.4.6 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in IN_PLACE mode that trusts attacker-controlled nodeName on live non-form nodes. Attackers can supply hostile live DOM objects with real script children whose observable nodeName is clobbered to appear as allowed elements, causing scripts to execute when the sanitized tree is inserted into a live document. |
| CVE-2026-65900 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify versions >=3.0.0 and before 3.4.8, when configured with SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES together with a DOM output mode (RETURN_DOM, RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT, or IN_PLACE), fail to strip template expressions (e.g. ${evil}, {{evil}}, <%evil%>) inside <template> element content. The final normalization/scrub pass (_scrubTemplateExpressions) uses a NodeIterator and node.normalize() that do not descend into template.content, so expressions that only form after adjacent text nodes merge survive sanitization. This bypasses SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES and can allow a downstream template engine to evaluate attacker-supplied expressions. The string output path is not affected. |
| CVE-2026-65899 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify 3.0.0 before 3.4.9 does not reset the retained Trusted Types policy when clearConfig() is called, so a DOMPurify instance reused across trust boundaries stays bound to a previously supplied TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY. A later caller that requests RETURN_TRUSTED_TYPE output receives a TrustedHTML object created by the old (potentially unsafe) policy rather than a clean default, which can lead to script execution at a Trusted Types sink. Passing TRUSTED_TYPES_POLICY: null on the later call also does not clear the retained policy. |
| CVE-2026-65898 | Medium | 2026-07-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | DOMPurify before 3.4.11 fails to clone the ALLOWED_ATTR allowlist when setConfig() is used with an uponSanitizeAttribute hook, allowing the hook to permanently mutate the shared allowlist. Attackers can register a hook that conditionally allows dangerous attributes like onerror for trusted elements, then submit untrusted content that inherits the polluted allowlist and executes event handlers as stored XSS. |
| CVE-2026-61217 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Security Service product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Oracle SSL API). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Oracle Security Service. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Security Service accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Security Service accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60962 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Flow Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Flow Manufacturing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Flow Manufacturing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60337 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60336 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-60321 | Medium | 2026-07-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.7 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-8861 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. |
| CVE-2026-7364 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, caused by an open redirect vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially crafted request to redirect a victim to arbitrary Web sites. |
| CVE-2026-4938 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an attacker with read-only privileges to make unauthorized modifications and deployments outside of their assigned permissions. |
| CVE-2026-49978 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Prior to 3.4.7, DOMPurify IN_PLACE sanitization could skip shadow contents attached to an element inside <template>.content, allowing attacker-controlled markup such as event handlers, JavaScript URLs, or scripts to survive and execute when an application cloned and inserted the sanitized template. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.7. |
| CVE-2026-49459 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Prior to 3.4.6, DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true }) could preserve event-handler attributes on an attacker-controlled <form> root when a descendant name clobbered properties checked by _isClobbered, because _forceRemove no-opped on the parent-less root and _sanitizeAttributes returned early. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.6. |
| CVE-2026-49458 | Medium | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Prior to 3.4.6, DOMPurify.sanitize(node, { IN_PLACE: true }) accepted same-origin foreign-realm DOM nodes while follow-on checks used parent-realm constructors, causing instanceof checks for forms, named node maps, document fragments, and elements to fail and skip clobber, template-content, and shadow-DOM sanitization branches so executable markup could survive. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.6. |
| CVE-2026-52761 | Medium | 2026-07-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ModSecurity is an open source, cross platform web application firewall (WAF) engine for Apache, IIS and Nginx. From 3.0.0 through 3.0.15, the t:utf8toUnicode transformation in src/actions/transformations/utf8_to_unicode.cc produces wrong output on i386 architecture because snprintf uses sizeof on a char pointer rather than the length of the unicode buffer, allowing rules that use this transformation to be bypassed on i386 architecture. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.16. |
| CVE-2026-56152 | Medium | 2026-07-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized information disclosure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Under certain conditions, a low-privileged authenticated user can access response action data that they are not authorized to view. |
| CVE-2026-12993 | Medium | 2026-06-26 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Apicurio Registry. The DocumentBuilderAccessor correctly blocks external DTD and schema access but does not disable DOCTYPE declarations or enable FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING. An attacker with artifact-write permission can upload XML documents with internal entity-expansion payloads (billion-laughs variant) that cause CPU and heap exhaustion, partially mitigated by the JAXP default 64,000 entity-expansion limit. |
| CVE-2026-57299 | Medium | 2026-06-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Missing permission checks in Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier allow attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate the names of configured Contrast metadata. |
| CVE-2026-57298 | Medium | 2026-06-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier allows attackers to have Jenkins connect to an attacker-specified URL using an attacker-specified username, API key, and service key. |
| CVE-2026-57297 | Medium | 2026-06-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using an attacker-specified username, API key, and service key. |
| CVE-2026-50634 | Medium | 2026-06-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Apache CXF's JwsJsonContainerRequestFilter can be exploited to cause CXF to process metadata that was not authenticated by the accepted signature. This can bypass the application's assumption that accepted `Content-Type` or protected HTTP-header metadata came from a verified signature entry, and may steer downstream JAX-RS entity parsing or signed-header consistency checks. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue. |
| CVE-2026-50630 | Medium | 2026-06-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A CRLF injection vulnerability exists in the OAuth2 AuthorizationUtils class. When constructing the WWW-Authenticate response header, the 'realm' parameter is concatenated without sanitizing Carriage Return (CR) and Line Feed (LF) characters. If an attacker can control the realm value, they can inject arbitrary HTTP headers or split the HTTP response entirely. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-50629 | Medium | 2026-06-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The 'clientId' parameter from incoming HTTP requests is directly concatenated into OAuth2 server log warning messages without sanitizing control characters. This allows an attacker to inject arbitrary content, including fake log entries, into the server's log files. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-50623 | Medium | 2026-06-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the OAuth2 TokenIntrospectionService in Apache CXF. Due to a missing 'throw' keyword in the security context check, the introspection endpoint (/services/oauth2/introspect) can be accessed by any unauthenticated network attacker. However note that this is a safeguard only in the case that someone forgot to enable authentication on the service. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-40997 | Medium | 2026-06-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Several Spring WS integration paths with Spring Security could surface detailed account state (for example locked or disabled user semantics) to remote SOAP clients through exception messages or callback outcomes, instead of failing with generic authentication errors. That behavior assists remote attackers in distinguishing valid accounts from invalid ones and inferring lifecycle state. Affected versions: Spring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8. |
| CVE-2026-40996 | Medium | 2026-06-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Wss4jSecurityInterceptor defaulted allowRSA15KeyTransportAlgorithm to true, overriding Apache WSS4J's safer default for validation RequestData. Inbound WS-Security decryption could therefore accept RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 (rsa-1_5) encrypted key material unless operators explicitly reconfigured the flag. Affected versions: Spring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8. |
| CVE-2026-40995 | Medium | 2026-06-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | X509AuthenticationProvider could issue a fully authenticated X509AuthenticationToken when a presented certificate mapped to UserDetails, without applying Spring Security's standard account lifecycle checks (disabled, locked, expired, or credentials-expired accounts). Affected versions: Spring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8. |
| CVE-2024-45636 | Medium | 2026-06-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security QRadar EDR 3.12 through 3.12.24 stores user credentials in plain text which can be read by a local privileged user. |
| CVE-2026-41706 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security's CookieRequestCache and CookieServerRequestCache store the pre-authentication request URL in a browser cookie so that users can be redirected back to their intended destination after a successful login. In affected versions, the full absolute URL is stored in the cookie and is used without validation as the post-login redirect target. Affected versions: Spring Security 5.7.0 through 5.7.23; 5.8.0 through 5.8.25; 6.3.0 through 6.3.16; 6.4.0 through 6.4.16; 6.5.0 through 6.5.10; 7.0.0 through 7.0.5. |
| CVE-2026-41694 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Since Spring Security SAML decrypts SAML Responses as well as elements of SAML LogoutRequests and LogoutResponses without requiring a valid signature, attackers may be able to craft these SAML payloads and use the Service Provider as a decryption oracle. Affected versions: Spring Security 5.7.0 through 5.7.23; 5.8.0 through 5.8.25; 6.3.0 through 6.3.16; 6.4.0 through 6.4.16; 6.5.0 through 6.5.10; 7.0.0 through 7.0.5. |
| CVE-2026-41008 | Medium | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security Authorization Server's authorization endpoint performs insufficient validation of the request_uri parameter. An attacker can craft a malicious authorization request containing an invalid request_uri and an arbitrary, unvalidated redirect_uri, which can lead to an Open Redirect vulnerability. Affected versions: Spring Security 7.0.0 through 7.0.5. Spring Authorization Server 1.5.0 through 1.5.7. |
| CVE-2026-42184 | Medium | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Tauri is a framework for building binaries for all major desktop platforms. From 2.0 to 2.11.0, a flaw in Tauri's is_local_url() function causes it to incorrectly classify remote URLs as trusted local origins on Windows and Android. On these systems, Tauri maps custom URI scheme protocols to http://<scheme>.localhost/ because those platforms' WebView implementations cannot serve custom URI schemes directly. The issue is that Tauri's check to see if the origin is local, only checks the first subdomain of the URL. An attacker can abuse this by hosting a page on a domain whose subdomain matches the custom scheme of the application. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.10.3. |
| CVE-2024-28765 | Medium | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM SDI 7.2.0.0 through 7.2.0.14 and IBM Security Directory Integrator 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. |
| CVE-2026-42408 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When BIG-IP DNS is provisioned, a vulnerability exists in an undisclosed TMOS Shell (tmsh) command that may allow a highly privileged authenticated attacker to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42063 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in iControl SOAP where an authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role can download sensitive files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42058 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker's undisclosed requests to BIG-IP iControl REST can lead to an information leak of BIG-IP local user account names. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41954 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive information disclosure vulnerability exists in the undisclosed iControl REST endpoint and TMOS Shell (tmsh) command which may allow an authenticated attacker with resource administrator role privileges to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40703 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the dashboard of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40435 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When configured, IP-based access restrictions for httpd do not cover all endpoints, which may allow connections from blocked addresses. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-34019 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is configured in Static and Dynamic routing protocols, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to stop processing BFD packets and cause the configured routing protocol to fail over. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-24464 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When running in Appliance mode, a directory traversal vulnerability exists in an undisclosed iControl REST endpoint that may allow an authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges to cross a security boundary and delete files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-44928 | Medium | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In uriparser before 1.0.2, the function family EqualsUri can misclassify two unequal URIs as equal. |
| CVE-2026-44927 | Medium | 2026-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In uriparser before 1.0.2, there is pointer difference truncation to int in various places. |
| CVE-2026-42519 | Medium | 2026-04-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A missing permission check in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1399.ve6a_66547f6e1 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate pending and approved Script Security classpaths. |
| CVE-2026-42371 | Medium | 2026-04-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | uriparser before 1.0.1 has numeric truncation in text range comparison, if an application accepts URIs with a length in gigabytes. |
| CVE-2026-5926 | Medium | 2026-04-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |
| CVE-2026-41240 | Medium | 2026-04-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Versions prior to 3.4.0 have an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used. Commit c361baa added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214. The same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely. This allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact. Version 3.4.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-22748 | Medium | 2026-04-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in Spring Spring Security. When an application configures JWT decoding with NimbusJwtDecoder or NimbusReactiveJwtDecoder, it must configure an OAuth2TokenValidator<Jwt> separately, for example by calling setJwtValidator.This issue affects Spring Security: from 6.3.0 through 6.3.14, from 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, from 6.5.0 through 6.5.9, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.4. |
| CVE-2026-22751 | Medium | 2026-04-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in Spring Spring Security. Applications that explicitly configure One-Time Token login with JdbcOneTimeTokenService are vulnerable to a Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition. This issue affects Spring Security: from 6.4.0 through 6.4.15, from 6.5.0 through 6.5.9, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.4. |
| CVE-2026-4364 | Medium | 2026-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 allows certificate listings retrieved via a browser session to return a JSON payload while incorrectly specifying the response Content-Type as text/html. Because the content is delivered with an HTML MIME type, browsers may interpret the JSON data as executable script under certain conditions. This creates an opportunity for JavaScript injection, potentially leading to cross-site scripting (XSS). |
| CVE-2026-2862 | Medium | 2026-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy. |
| CVE-2026-2475 | Medium | 2026-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, caused by an open redirect vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially crafted request to redirect a victim to arbitrary Web sites. |
| CVE-2026-1491 | Medium | 2026-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy. |
| CVE-2026-3468 | Medium | 2026-03-31 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the SonicWall Email Security appliance due to improper neutralization of user-supplied input during web page generation, allowing a remote authenticated attacker as admin user to potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript code. |
| CVE-2026-33545 | Medium | 2026-03-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | MobSF is a mobile application security testing tool used. Prior to version 4.4.6, MobSF's `read_sqlite()` function in `mobsf/MobSF/utils.py` (lines 542-566) uses Python string formatting (`%`) to construct SQL queries with table names read from a SQLite database's `sqlite_master` table. When a security analyst uses MobSF to analyze a malicious mobile application containing a crafted SQLite database, attacker-controlled table names are interpolated directly into SQL queries without parameterization or escaping. This allows an attacker to cause denial of service and achieve SQL injection. Version 4.4.6 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2026-1276 | Medium | 2026-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2025-36051 | Medium | 2026-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 stores potentially sensitive information in configuration files that could be read by a local user. |
| CVE-2025-15051 | Medium | 2026-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality. |
| CVE-2025-13995 | Medium | 2026-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar SIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 Update Package 14 could allow an attacker with access to one tenant to access hostname data from another tenant's account. |
| CVE-2025-2274 | Medium | 2026-03-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in Forcepoint Web Security (On-Prem) on Windows allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Web Security through 8.5.6. |
| CVE-2026-27661 | Medium | 2026-03-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.9.0). The affected application leaks confidential information in metadata, and files such as information on contributors and email address, on `SSM Server`. |
| CVE-2026-3746 | Medium | 2026-03-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Simple Responsive Tourism Website 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /tourism/classes/Login.php?f=login of the component Login. This manipulation of the argument Username causes sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. |
| CVE-2025-64166 | Medium | 2026-03-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Mercurius is a GraphQL adapter for Fastify. Prior to version 16.4.0, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The issue arises from incorrect parsing of the Content-Type header in requests. Specifically, requests with Content-Type values such as application/x-www-form-urlencoded, multipart/form-data, or text/plain could be misinterpreted as application/json. This misinterpretation bypasses the preflight checks performed by the fetch() API, potentially allowing unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of an authenticated user. This issue has been patched in version 16.4.0. |