Overview 16 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
16matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
1exploited6.2%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
2EPSS ≥ 0.512.5%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
6
37.5%
Not applicable
10
62.5%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
16
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
6.2%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
6.2%
Forecast only
2
12.5%
No public exploit
12
75.0%
split by
peak 3 / quarter
Q3 192
Outside Waratek scope2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q4 190
Q1 200
Q2 203
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
High3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
Q3 200
Q4 201
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 212
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
Q2 210
Q3 213
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable1
High3
not blocked3
Forecast only1
No public exploit2
Q4 211
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Forecast only1
Q1 221
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 222
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
Exploited1
No public exploit1
Q3 220
Q4 220
Q1 231
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20Q1 21Q3 21Q1 22Q3 22Q1 23
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-0524 | High | 2023-02-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | As part of our Security Development Lifecycle, a potential privilege escalation issue was identified internally. This could allow a malicious actor with sufficient permissions to modify environment variables and abuse an impacted plugin in order to escalate privileges. We have resolved the issue and also made several defense-in-depth fixes alongside. While the probability of successful exploitation is low, Tenable is committed to securing our customers’ environments and our products. The updates have been distributed via the Tenable plugin feed in feed serial numbers equal to or greater than #202212212055. |
| CVE-2022-24828 | High | 2022-04-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Composer is a dependency manager for the PHP programming language. Integrators using Composer code to call `VcsDriver::getFileContent` can have a code injection vulnerability if the user can control the `$file` or `$identifier` argument. This leads to a vulnerability on packagist.org for example where the composer.json's `readme` field can be used as a vector for injecting parameters into hg/Mercurial via the `$file` argument, or git via the `$identifier` argument if you allow arbitrary data there (Packagist does not, but maybe other integrators do). Composer itself should not be affected by the vulnerability as it does not call `getFileContent` with arbitrary data into `$file`/`$identifier`. To the best of our knowledge this was not abused, and the vulnerability has been patched on packagist.org and Private Packagist within a day of the vulnerability report. |
| CVE-2022-24785 | High | 2022-04-04 | Not applicable | Exploited | Moment.js is a JavaScript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates. A path traversal vulnerability impacts npm (server) users of Moment.js between versions 1.0.1 and 2.29.1, especially if a user-provided locale string is directly used to switch moment locale. This problem is patched in 2.29.2, and the patch can be applied to all affected versions. As a workaround, sanitize the user-provided locale name before passing it to Moment.js. |
| CVE-2022-0130 | High | 2022-01-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Tenable.sc versions 5.14.0 through 5.19.1 were found to contain a remote code execution vulnerability which could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute code under special circumstances. An attacker would first have to stage a specific file type in the web server root of the Tenable.sc host prior to remote exploitation. |
| CVE-2021-44224 | High | 2021-12-20 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | A crafted URI sent to httpd configured as a forward proxy (ProxyRequests on) can cause a crash (NULL pointer dereference) or, for configurations mixing forward and reverse proxy declarations, can allow for requests to be directed to a declared Unix Domain Socket endpoint (Server Side Request Forgery). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.7 up to 2.4.51 (included). |
| CVE-2021-34798 | High | 2021-09-16 | Outside Waratek scope | Forecast only | Malformed requests may cause the server to dereference a NULL pointer. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. |
| CVE-2021-3712 | High | 2021-08-24 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. Numerous OpenSSL functions that print ASN.1 data have been found to assume that the ASN1_STRING byte array will be NUL terminated, even though this is not guaranteed for strings that have been directly constructed. Where an application requests an ASN.1 structure to be printed, and where that ASN.1 structure contains ASN1_STRINGs that have been directly constructed by the application without NUL terminating the "data" field, then a read buffer overrun can occur. The same thing can also occur during name constraints processing of certificates (for example if a certificate has been directly constructed by the application instead of loading it via the OpenSSL parsing functions, and the certificate contains non NUL terminated ASN1_STRING structures). It can also occur in the X509_get1_email(), X509_REQ_get1_email() and X509_get1_ocsp() functions. If a malicious actor can cause an application to directly construct an ASN1_STRING and then process it through one of the affected OpenSSL functions then this issue could be hit. This might result in a crash (causing a Denial of Service attack). It could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2za (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2y). |
| CVE-2021-33193 | High | 2021-08-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A crafted method sent through HTTP/2 will bypass validation and be forwarded by mod_proxy, which can lead to request splitting or cache poisoning. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.17 to 2.4.48. |
| CVE-2021-23358 | High | 2021-03-29 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The package underscore from 1.13.0-0 and before 1.13.0-2, from 1.3.2 and before 1.12.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Injection via the template function, particularly when a variable property is passed as an argument as it is not sanitized. |
| CVE-2021-20076 | High | 2021-03-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Tenable.sc and Tenable.sc Core versions 5.13.0 through 5.17.0 were found to contain a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated, unprivileged user to perform Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the Tenable.sc server via Hypertext Preprocessor unserialization. |
| CVE-2020-5808 | High | 2020-12-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In certain scenarios in Tenable.sc prior to 5.17.0, a scanner could potentially be used outside the user's defined scan zone without a particular zone being specified within the Automatic Distribution configuration. |
| CVE-2020-7067 | High | 2020-04-27 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In PHP versions 7.2.x below 7.2.30, 7.3.x below 7.3.17 and 7.4.x below 7.4.5, if PHP is compiled with EBCDIC support (uncommon), urldecode() function can be made to access locations past the allocated memory, due to erroneously using signed numbers as array indexes. |
| CVE-2020-11655 | High | 2020-04-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQLite through 3.31.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via a malformed window-function query because the AggInfo object's initialization is mishandled. |
| CVE-2020-7065 | High | 2020-04-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In PHP versions 7.3.x below 7.3.16 and 7.4.x below 7.4.4, while using mb_strtolower() function with UTF-32LE encoding, certain invalid strings could cause PHP to overwrite stack-allocated buffer. This could lead to memory corruption, crashes and potentially code execution. |
| CVE-2019-11042 | High | 2019-08-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | When PHP EXIF extension is parsing EXIF information from an image, e.g. via exif_read_data() function, in PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.31, 7.2.x below 7.2.21 and 7.3.x below 7.3.8 it is possible to supply it with data what will cause it to read past the allocated buffer. This may lead to information disclosure or crash. |
| CVE-2019-11041 | High | 2019-08-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | When PHP EXIF extension is parsing EXIF information from an image, e.g. via exif_read_data() function, in PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.31, 7.2.x below 7.2.21 and 7.3.x below 7.3.8 it is possible to supply it with data what will cause it to read past the allocated buffer. This may lead to information disclosure or crash. |