WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product stormshield network security✕
Overview 17 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
17matches 0in Waratek scope0.0% 0protected0.0% 0exploited0.0% 0CISA KEV0.0% 1public PoC5.9% 1EPSS ≥ 0.55.9%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 0 0.0% Outside Waratek scope 0 0.0% Not applicable 17 100.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 17 100.0% Medium 0 0.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 17 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 0 0.0% Working exploit published 0 0.0% Proof of concept only 1 5.9% Forecast only 1 5.9% No public exploit 15 88.2%
split by peak 5 / year
Not applicable: 17 High: 17 not blocked: 17 No public exploit: 15Forecast only: 1Proof of concept only: 1
20191 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20201 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20213 Not applicable3 High3 not blocked3 Proof of concept only1 No public exploit2 20225 Not applicable5 High5 not blocked5 No public exploit5 20235 Not applicable5 High5 not blocked5 Forecast only1 No public exploit4 20241 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 20251 Not applicable1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
2019202020212022202320242025
17 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2025-48707 High 2025-09-25 Not applicable No public exploit An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 5.0.1. TPM authentication information could, in some HA use cases, be shared among administrators, which can cause secret sharing.
CVE-2023-34198 High 2024-02-29 Not applicable No public exploit In Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 1.0.0 through 3.7.36 before 3.7.37, 3.8.0 through 3.11.24 before 3.11.25, 4.0.0 through 4.3.18 before 4.3.19, 4.4.0 through 4.6.5 before 4.6.6, and 4.7.0 before 4.7.1, the usage of a Network object created from an inactive DHCP interface in the filtering slot results in the usage of an object of the :any" type, which may have unexpected results for access control.
CVE-2023-28616 High 2023-12-26 Not applicable No public exploit An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 4.3.17, 4.4.x through 4.6.x before 4.6.4, and 4.7.x before 4.7.1. It affects user accounts for which the password has an equals sign or space character. The serverd process logs such passwords in cleartext, and potentially sends these logs to the Syslog component.
CVE-2023-47091 High 2023-12-25 Not applicable No public exploit An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) SNS 4.3.13 through 4.3.22 before 4.3.23, SNS 4.6.0 through 4.6.9 before 4.6.10, and SNS 4.7.0 through 4.7.1 before 4.7.2. An attacker can overflow the cookie threshold, making an IPsec connection impossible.
CVE-2023-26095 High 2023-08-28 Not applicable No public exploit ASQ in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 4.3.15 before 4.3.16 and 4.6.x before 4.6.3 allows a crash when analysing a crafted SIP packet.
CVE-2023-0286 High 2023-02-08 Not applicable Forecast only There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an ASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME incorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This field is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp as an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled (i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this vulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp call, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service. In most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the certificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid signature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other input must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point, which is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only affect applications which have implemented their own functionality for retrieving CRLs over a network.
CVE-2022-4450 High 2023-02-08 Not applicable No public exploit The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected. These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also impacted by this issue.
CVE-2022-40617 High 2022-10-31 Not applicable No public exploit strongSwan before 5.9.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service in the revocation plugin by sending a crafted end-entity (and intermediate CA) certificate that contains a CRL/OCSP URL that points to a server (under the attacker's control) that doesn't properly respond but (for example) just does nothing after the initial TCP handshake, or sends an excessive amount of application data.
CVE-2022-27812 High 2022-08-24 Not applicable No public exploit Flooding SNS firewall versions 3.7.0 to 3.7.29, 3.11.0 to 3.11.17, 4.2.0 to 4.2.10, and 4.3.0 to 4.3.6 with specific forged traffic, can lead to SNS DoS.
CVE-2022-30279 High 2022-05-12 Not applicable No public exploit An issue was discovered in Stormshield Network Security (SNS) 4.3.x before 4.3.8. The event logging of the ASQ sofbus lacbus plugin triggers the dereferencing of a NULL pointer, leading to a crash of SNS. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability via forged sofbus lacbus traffic to cause a firmware crash.
CVE-2022-23989 High 2022-03-15 Not applicable No public exploit In Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 3.7.25, 3.8.x through 3.11.x before 3.11.13, 4.x before 4.2.10, and 4.3.x before 4.3.5, a flood of connections to the SSLVPN service might lead to saturation of the loopback interface. This could result in the blocking of almost all network traffic, making the firewall unreachable. An attacker could exploit this via forged and properly timed traffic to cause a denial of service.
CVE-2021-28962 High 2022-01-31 Not applicable No public exploit Stormshield Network Security (SNS) before 4.2.2 allows a read-only administrator to gain privileges via CLI commands.
CVE-2002-20001 High 2021-11-11 Not applicable Proof of concept only The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE.
CVE-2021-28127 High 2021-07-01 Not applicable No public exploit An issue was discovered in Stormshield SNS through 4.2.1. A brute-force attack can occur.
CVE-2021-28665 High 2021-05-06 Not applicable No public exploit Stormshield SNS with versions before 3.7.18, 3.11.6 and 4.1.6 has a memory-management defect in the SNMP plugin that can lead to excessive consumption of memory and CPU resources, and possibly a denial of service.
CVE-2020-7466 High 2020-10-06 Not applicable No public exploit The PPP implementation of MPD before 5.9 allows a remote attacker who can send specifically crafted PPP authentication message to cause the daemon to read beyond allocated memory buffer, which would result in a denial of service condition.
CVE-2018-20850 High 2019-07-04 Not applicable No public exploit Stormshield Network Security 2.0.0 through 2.13.0 and 3.0.0 through 3.7.1 has self-XSS in the command line interface of the SNS web server.