Overview 17 matches · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
17matches
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
0public PoC0.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
17
100.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
17
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
5.9%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
16
94.1%
split by
peak 9 / quarter
Q3 221
No exploit published1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 230
Q4 230
Q1 240
Q2 240
Q3 240
Q4 241
No exploit published1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 250
Q2 251
No exploit published1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 250
Q4 250
Q1 261
No exploit published1
Low1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 264
No exploit published4
Low4
not blocked4
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit3
Q3 269
No exploit published9
Low9
not blocked9
No public exploit9
Q3 22Q1 23Q3 23Q1 24Q3 24Q1 25Q3 25Q1 26Q3 26
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-59314 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Applications that build a Content-Disposition header value from untrusted input may be vulnerable to HTTP response splitting when the input is a malicious file name. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59305 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Partition interceptor may be improperly added while sending message. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-59304 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper caching of the original content type in Spring Cloud Stream Avro. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-59303 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Dynamic destination cache size is not properly bound in Spring Cloud Stream. Spring Cloud Stream 5.0.0 - 5.0.2 Spring Cloud Stream 4.3.0 - 4.3.3 Spring Cloud Stream 4.2.0 - 4.2.6 |
| CVE-2026-59300 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Potential for logging sensitive data in Spring Cloud Function AWS. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59299 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Composition lookup can potentially poison base function in Spring Cloud Function. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59298 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Potential for improper filtering of HTTP headers in Spring Cloud Function. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 Spring Cloud Function 3.2.16 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-59297 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Implementation of isSecure() call of ServerlessHttpServletRequest does not verify the actual scheme. Spring Cloud Function 5.0.0 - 5.0.3 Spring Cloud Function 4.3.0 - 4.3.4 Spring Cloud Function 4.2.0 - 4.2.7 |
| CVE-2026-59292 | Low | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | PropertiesPersistingMetadataStore, the default file-based ConcurrentMetadataStore, persists its state to ${java.io.tmpdir}/spring-integration/metadata-store.properties with world-readable permissions. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier |
| CVE-2026-41000 | Low | 2026-06-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Wss4jSecurityInterceptor did not consistently wire Apache WSS4J ReplayCache instances into RequestData for validation-time checks. As a result, protections against replay of UsernameToken nonces and creation timestamps, Timestamp elements, and certain SAML one-time-use semantics could be ineffective even when operators configured a replay cache on the interceptor. Affected versions: Spring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8. |
| CVE-2026-9370 | Low | 2026-05-24 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | A weakness has been identified in ulisesbocchio jasypt-spring-boot up to 3.0.5/4.0.4. Affected by this vulnerability is the function getSecretKeySaltGenerator of the file jasypt-spring-boot/src/main/java/com/ulisesbocchio/jasyptspringboot/encryptor/SimpleGCMConfig.java of the component Password Hash Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to use of a one-way hash with a predictable salt. The attack can be launched remotely. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. |
| CVE-2026-22741 | Low | 2026-04-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to cache poisoning when resolving static resources. More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true: * the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux * the application is configuring the resource chain support https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webmvc/mvc-config/static-resources.html#page-title with caching enabled * the application adds support for encoded resources resolution * the resource cache must be empty when the attacker has access to the application When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests and poison the resource cache with resources using the wrong encoding. This can cause a denial of service by breaking the front-end application for clients. |
| CVE-2026-22746 | Low | 2026-04-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in Spring Spring Security. If an application is using the UserDetails#isEnabled, #isAccountNonExpired, or #isAccountNonLocked user attributes, to enable, expire, or lock users, then DaoAuthenticationProvider's timing attack defense can be bypassed for users who are disabled, expired, or locked.This issue affects Spring Security: from 5.7.0 through 5.7.22, from 5.8.0 through 5.8.24, from 6.3.0 through 6.3.15, from 6.5.0 through 6.5.9, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.4. |
| CVE-2026-22735 | Low | 2026-03-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to stream corruption when using Server-Sent Events (SSE). This issue affects Spring Foundation: from 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, from 6.2.0 through 6.2.16, from 6.1.0 through 6.1.25, from 5.3.0 through 5.3.46. |
| CVE-2025-22233 | Low | 2025-05-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | CVE-2024-38820 ensured Locale-independent, lowercase conversion for both the configured disallowedFields patterns and for request parameter names. However, there are still cases where it is possible to bypass the disallowedFields checks. Affected Spring Products and Versions Spring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.6 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.19 * 6.0.0 - 6.0.27 * 5.3.0 - 5.3.42 * Older, unsupported versions are also affected Mitigation Users of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix Version Availability 6.2.x 6.2.7 OSS6.1.x 6.1.20 OSS6.0.x 6.0.28 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ 5.3.x 5.3.43 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. Generally, we recommend using a dedicated model object with properties only for data binding, or using constructor binding since constructor arguments explicitly declare what to bind together with turning off setter binding through the declarativeBinding flag. See the Model Design section in the reference documentation. For setting binding, prefer the use of allowedFields (an explicit list) over disallowedFields. Credit This issue was responsibly reported by the TERASOLUNA Framework Development Team from NTT DATA Group Corporation. |
| CVE-2024-38829 | Low | 2024-12-04 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Spring LDAP allows data exposure for case sensitive comparisons.This issue affects Spring LDAP: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.3, from 3.0.0 through 3.0.9, from 3.1.0 through 3.1.7, from 3.2.0 through 3.2.7, AND all versions prior to 2.4.0. The usage of String.toLowerCase() and String.toUpperCase() has some Locale dependent exceptions that could potentially result in unintended columns from being queried Related to CVE-2024-38820 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-38820 |
| CVE-2022-31679 | Low | 2022-09-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Applications that allow HTTP PATCH access to resources exposed by Spring Data REST in versions 3.6.0 - 3.5.5, 3.7.0 - 3.7.2, and older unsupported versions, if an attacker knows about the structure of the underlying domain model, they can craft HTTP requests that expose hidden entity attributes. |