WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product snap creator framework✕
Overview 19 matches · 13 in Waratek scope · 3 protected · 4 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 6 public PoC · 6 EPSS ≥ 0.5
19matches 13in Waratek scope68.4% 3protected15.8% 4exploited21.1% 1CISA KEV5.3% 6public PoC31.6% 6EPSS ≥ 0.531.6%
Protected by Waratek 3 15.8% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 1 5.3% No exploit published 9 47.4% Outside Waratek scope 4 21.1% Not applicable 2 10.5% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 19 100.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 3 15.8% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 16 84.2% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 4 21.1% Working exploit published 2 10.5% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 1 5.3% No public exploit 12 63.2%
split by peak 3 / quarter
Not applicable: 2Outside Waratek scope: 4No exploit published: 9Mitigation candidate: 1Protected by Waratek: 3 Medium: 19 not blocked: 16blocked by ARMR today: 3 No public exploit: 12Forecast only: 1Working exploit published: 2Exploited: 4
Q1 171 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q2 170 Q3 172 No exploit published1 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 Q4 170 Q1 180 Q2 180 Q3 180 Q4 181 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 Working exploit published1 Q1 190 Q2 192 No exploit published2 Medium2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 Q3 190 Q4 190 Q1 201 Not applicable1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q2 203 Protected by Waratek1 Outside Waratek scope2 Medium3 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked2 Exploited2 Working exploit published1 Q3 201 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q4 202 No exploit published2 Medium2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 Q1 211 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 Forecast only1 Q2 211 Mitigation candidate1 Medium1 not blocked1 Exploited1 Q3 211 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1 Q4 212 Protected by Waratek1 No exploit published1 Medium2 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked1 No public exploit2 Q1 220 Q2 221 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22
19 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2022-22968 Medium 2022-04-14 No exploit published No public exploit In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.18, 5.2.0 - 5.2.20, and older unsupported versions, the patterns for disallowedFields on a DataBinder are case sensitive which means a field is not effectively protected unless it is listed with both upper and lower case for the first character of the field, including upper and lower case for the first character of all nested fields within the property path.
CVE-2021-42550 Medium 2021-12-16 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In logback version 1.2.7 and prior versions, an attacker with the required privileges to edit configurations files could craft a malicious configuration allowing to execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers.
CVE-2021-22096 Medium 2021-10-28 No exploit published No public exploit In Spring Framework versions 5.3.0 - 5.3.10, 5.2.0 - 5.2.17, and older unsupported versions, it is possible for a user to provide malicious input to cause the insertion of additional log entries.
CVE-2021-34429 Medium 2021-07-15 Protected by Waratek Exploited For Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.37-9.4.42, 10.0.1-10.0.5 & 11.0.1-11.0.5, URIs can be crafted using some encoded characters to access the content of the WEB-INF directory and/or bypass some security constraints. This is a variation of the vulnerability reported in CVE-2021-28164/GHSA-v7ff-8wcx-gmc5.
CVE-2021-28169 Medium 2021-06-09 Mitigation candidate Exploited For Eclipse Jetty versions <= 9.4.40, <= 10.0.2, <= 11.0.2, it is possible for requests to the ConcatServlet with a doubly encoded path to access protected resources within the WEB-INF directory. For example a request to `/concat?/%2557EB-INF/web.xml` can retrieve the web.xml file. This can reveal sensitive information regarding the implementation of a web application.
CVE-2020-27223 Medium 2021-02-26 No exploit published Forecast only In Eclipse Jetty 9.4.6.v20170531 to 9.4.36.v20210114 (inclusive), 10.0.0, and 11.0.0 when Jetty handles a request containing multiple Accept headers with a large number of “quality” (i.e. q) parameters, the server may enter a denial of service (DoS) state due to high CPU usage processing those quality values, resulting in minutes of CPU time exhausted processing those quality values.
CVE-2020-27218 Medium 2020-11-28 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty version 9.4.0.RC0 to 9.4.34.v20201102, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.0.beta2, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.0.beta2, if GZIP request body inflation is enabled and requests from different clients are multiplexed onto a single connection, and if an attacker can send a request with a body that is received entirely but not consumed by the application, then a subsequent request on the same connection will see that body prepended to its body. The attacker will not see any data but may inject data into the body of the subsequent request.
CVE-2020-13954 Medium 2020-11-12 No exploit published No public exploit By default, Apache CXF creates a /services page containing a listing of the available endpoint names and addresses. This webpage is vulnerable to a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack via the styleSheetPath, which allows a malicious actor to inject javascript into the web page. This vulnerability affects all versions of Apache CXF prior to 3.4.1 and 3.3.8. Please note that this is a separate issue to CVE-2019-17573.
CVE-2020-5421 Medium 2020-09-19 No exploit published No public exploit In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter.
CVE-2020-7656 Medium 2020-05-19 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published jquery prior to 1.9.0 allows Cross-site Scripting attacks via the load method. The load method fails to recognize and remove "<script>" HTML tags that contain a whitespace character, i.e: "</script >", which results in the enclosed script logic to be executed.
CVE-2020-11023 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2020-11022 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery starting with 1.12.0 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2016-5710 Medium 2020-02-11 Not applicable No public exploit NetApp Snap Creator Framework before 4.3P1 allows remote authenticated users to conduct clickjacking attacks via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2019-10247 Medium 2019-04-22 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty version 7.x, 8.x, 9.2.27 and older, 9.3.26 and older, and 9.4.16 and older, the server running on any OS and Jetty version combination will reveal the configured fully qualified directory base resource location on the output of the 404 error for not finding a Context that matches the requested path. The default server behavior on jetty-distribution and jetty-home will include at the end of the Handler tree a DefaultHandler, which is responsible for reporting this 404 error, it presents the various configured contexts as HTML for users to click through to. This produced HTML includes output that contains the configured fully qualified directory base resource location for each context.
CVE-2019-10246 Medium 2019-04-22 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty version 9.2.27, 9.3.26, and 9.4.16, the server running on Windows is vulnerable to exposure of the fully qualified Base Resource directory name on Windows to a remote client when it is configured for showing a Listing of directory contents. This information reveal is restricted to only the content in the configured base resource directories.
CVE-2018-11784 Medium 2018-10-04 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published When the default servlet in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.11, 8.5.0 to 8.5.33 and 7.0.23 to 7.0.90 returned a redirect to a directory (e.g. redirecting to '/foo/' when the user requested '/foo') a specially crafted URL could be used to cause the redirect to be generated to any URI of the attackers choice.
CVE-2016-6794 Medium 2017-08-10 No exploit published No public exploit When a SecurityManager is configured, a web application's ability to read system properties should be controlled by the SecurityManager. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70, 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 the system property replacement feature for configuration files could be used by a malicious web application to bypass the SecurityManager and read system properties that should not be visible.
CVE-2016-0762 Medium 2017-08-10 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The Realm implementations in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 did not process the supplied password if the supplied user name did not exist. This made a timing attack possible to determine valid user names. Note that the default configuration includes the LockOutRealm which makes exploitation of this vulnerability harder.
CVE-2016-5372 Medium 2017-02-07 Not applicable No public exploit Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NetApp Snap Creator Framework before 4.3.0P1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors.