Overview 115 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 5 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 18 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
115matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
5exploited4.3%
1CISA KEV0.9%
18public PoC15.7%
4EPSS ≥ 0.53.5%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
115
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
115
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 17 / year
19981
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19991
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20003
Not applicable3
High1
Medium2
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20014
Not applicable4
High3
Medium1
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20023
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20031
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20045
Not applicable5
High2
Medium2
Low1
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20057
Not applicable7
High6
Medium1
not blocked7
Working exploit published4
No public exploit3
20068
Not applicable8
High6
Medium2
not blocked8
Working exploit published2
No public exploit6
20072
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20085
Not applicable5
High1
Medium2
Low2
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20091
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20103
Not applicable3
Medium2
Low1
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20110
20120
20130
20141
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20150
20160
20174
Not applicable4
Critical1
High1
Medium2
not blocked4
No public exploit4
20180
20194
Not applicable4
Critical1
Medium3
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20206
Not applicable6
Critical2
High3
Medium1
not blocked6
Exploited2
Working exploit published2
No public exploit2
20212
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
202213
Not applicable13
Critical1
High3
Medium9
not blocked13
Exploited1
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit10
202316
Not applicable16
Critical1
High6
Medium9
not blocked16
Exploited1
Proof of concept only4
No public exploit11
202417
Not applicable17
Critical3
High8
Medium5
Low1
not blocked17
Exploited1
Proof of concept only3
No public exploit13
20258
Not applicable8
High6
Medium2
not blocked8
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit7
1998200120042007201020132016201920222025
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-62875 | Medium | 2025-11-20 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in OpenSMTPD allows local users to crash OpenSMTPD. This issue affects openSUSE Tumbleweed: from ? before 7.8.0p0-1.1. |
| CVE-2024-13908 | High | 2025-03-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The SMTP by BestWebSoft plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the 'save_options' function in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.9. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. |
| CVE-2024-13844 | Medium | 2025-03-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Post SMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the ‘columns’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.2 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. |
| CVE-2025-0953 | High | 2025-02-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The SMTP for Sendinblue – YaySMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including, 1.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CVE-2025-0918 | High | 2025-02-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The SMTP for SendGrid – YaySMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including, 1.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CVE-2025-0916 | High | 2025-02-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The YaySMTP and Email Logs: Amazon SES, SendGrid, Outlook, Mailgun, Brevo, Google and Any SMTP Service plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions 2.4.9 to 2.6.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Note: The vulnerability has been initially patched in version 2.4.8 and was reintroduced in version 2.4.9 with the removal of the wp_kses_post() built-in WordPress sanitization function. |
| CVE-2025-0521 | High | 2025-02-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Post SMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the from and subject parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CVE-2025-22800 | High | 2025-01-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Missing Authorization vulnerability in Saad Iqbal Post SMTP post-smtp allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Post SMTP: from n/a through <= 2.9.11. |
| CVE-2024-52436 | High | 2024-11-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Saad Iqbal Post SMTP post-smtp allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Post SMTP: from n/a through <= 2.9.9. |
| CVE-2024-50530 | Critical | 2024-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Myriad Solutionz Stars SMTP Mailer stars-smtp-mailer allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Stars SMTP Mailer: from n/a through <= 2.2.1. |
| CVE-2024-8477 | Medium | 2024-10-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Brevo (formely Sendinblue) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.87. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the Init() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log out of a Brevo connection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CVE-2024-43287 | High | 2024-08-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Brevo Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue.This issue affects Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue: from n/a through 3.1.82. |
| CVE-2024-3073 | Low | 2024-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Easy WP SMTP by SendLayer – WordPress SMTP and Email Log Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to information exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.3.0. This is due to plugin providing the SMTP password in the SMTP Password field when viewing the settings. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrative-level access and above, to view the SMTP password for the supplied server. Although this would not be useful for attackers in most cases, if an administrator account becomes compromised this could be useful information to an attacker in a limited environment. |
| CVE-2023-52233 | Critical | 2024-06-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Missing Authorization vulnerability in Post SMTP Post SMTP Mailer/Email Log.This issue affects Post SMTP Mailer/Email Log: from n/a through 2.8.6. |
| CVE-2024-35668 | High | 2024-06-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Brevo Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue: from n/a through 3.1.77. |
| CVE-2024-5207 | High | 2024-05-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The POST SMTP – The #1 WordPress SMTP Plugin with Advanced Email Logging and Delivery Failure Notifications plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the selected parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.3 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with administrator access or higher to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. |
| CVE-2024-29128 | High | 2024-03-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Post SMTP POST SMTP allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects POST SMTP: from n/a through 2.8.6. |
| CVE-2024-27305 | Medium | 2024-03-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | aiosmtpd is a reimplementation of the Python stdlib smtpd.py based on asyncio. aiosmtpd is vulnerable to inbound SMTP smuggling. SMTP smuggling is a novel vulnerability based on not so novel interpretation differences of the SMTP protocol. By exploiting SMTP smuggling, an attacker may send smuggle/spoof e-mails with fake sender addresses, allowing advanced phishing attacks. This issue is also existed in other SMTP software like Postfix. With the right SMTP server constellation, an attacker can send spoofed e-mails to inbound/receiving aiosmtpd instances. This issue has been addressed in version 1.4.5. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-25914 | High | 2024-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Photoboxone SMTP Mail.This issue affects SMTP Mail: from n/a through 1.3.20. |
| CVE-2023-3178 | Medium | 2024-01-16 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.5.7 does not have proper CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in users with the manage_postman_smtp capability delete arbitrary logs via a CSRF attack. |
| CVE-2023-6620 | High | 2024-01-15 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.8.7 does not properly sanitise and escape several parameters before using them in SQL statements, leading to a SQL injection exploitable by high privilege users such as admin. |
| CVE-2023-6875 | Critical | 2024-01-11 | Not applicable | Exploited | The POST SMTP Mailer – Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data and modification of data due to a type juggling issue on the connect-app REST endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.7. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the API key used to authenticate to the mailer and view logs, including password reset emails, allowing site takeover. CVE-2023-52233 appears to be a duplicate of this issue. |
| CVE-2023-7027 | High | 2024-01-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The POST SMTP Mailer – Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘device’ header in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CVE-2023-6629 | Medium | 2024-01-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The POST SMTP Mailer – Email log, Delivery Failure Notifications and Best Mail SMTP for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘msg’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. CVE-2023-6621 appears to be a duplicate of this issue. CVE-2024-29128 appears to be a duplicate of this issue. |
| CVE-2023-6621 | Medium | 2024-01-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The POST SMTP WordPress plugin before 2.8.7 does not sanitise and escape the msg parameter before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin. |
| CVE-2021-35975 | Medium | 2023-11-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Absolute path traversal vulnerability in the Systematica SMTP Adapter component (up to v2.0.1.101) in Systematica Radius (up to v.3.9.256.777) allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a full pathname in GET parameter "file" in URL. Also: affected components in same product - HTTP Adapter (up to v.1.8.0.15), MSSQL MessageBus Proxy (up to v.1.1.06), Financial Calculator (up to v.1.3.05), FIX Adapter (up to v.2.4.0.25) |
| CVE-2023-5958 | Medium | 2023-11-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.7.1 does not escape email message content before displaying it in the backend, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to perform XSS attacks against highly privileged users. |
| CVE-2023-3213 | Medium | 2023-10-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The WP Mail SMTP Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data due to a missing capability check on the is_print_page function in versions up to, and including, 3.8.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disclose potentially sensitive email information. |
| CVE-2023-39441 | Medium | 2023-08-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Apache Airflow SMTP Provider before 1.3.0, Apache Airflow IMAP Provider before 3.3.0, and Apache Airflow before 2.7.0 are affected by the Validation of OpenSSL Certificate vulnerability. The default SSL context with SSL library did not check a server's X.509 certificate. Instead, the code accepted any certificate, which could result in the disclosure of mail server credentials or mail contents when the client connects to an attacker in a MITM position. Users are strongly advised to upgrade to Apache Airflow version 2.7.0 or newer, Apache Airflow IMAP Provider version 3.3.0 or newer, and Apache Airflow SMTP Provider version 1.3.0 or newer to mitigate the risk associated with this vulnerability |
| CVE-2023-3179 | High | 2023-07-17 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The POST SMTP Mailer WordPress plugin before 2.5.7 does not have proper CSRF checks in some AJAX actions, which could allow attackers to make logged in users with the manage_postman_smtp capability resend an email to an arbitrary address (for example a password reset email could be resent to an attacker controlled email, and allow them to take over an account). |
| CVE-2023-3093 | High | 2023-07-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The YaySMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via email contents in versions up to, and including, 2.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CVE-2023-3092 | High | 2023-07-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The SMTP Mail plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via an email subject in versions up to, and including, 1.3.46 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping when the 'Save Data SendMail' feature is enabled. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CVE-2023-3087 | High | 2023-07-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The FluentSMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via an email subject in versions up to, and including, 2.2.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CVE-2023-3082 | High | 2023-07-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Post SMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via email contents in versions up to, and including, 2.5.7 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. |
| CVE-2021-4422 | Medium | 2023-07-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The POST SMTP Mailer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.0.20. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handleCsvExport() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger a CSV export via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| CVE-2023-28496 | Medium | 2023-06-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SMTP2GO – Email Made Easy plugin <= 1.4.2 versions. |
| CVE-2019-25141 | Critical | 2023-06-07 | Not applicable | Exploited | The Easy WP SMTP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in versions up to, and including, 1.3.9. This is due to missing capability checks on the admin_init() function, in addition to insufficient input validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugins settings and arbitrary options on the site that can be used to inject new administrative user accounts. |
| CVE-2023-2472 | Medium | 2023-06-05 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue WordPress plugin before 3.1.61 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before outputting it back in the admin dashboard when the WPML plugin is also active and configured, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting which could be used against high privilege users such as admin |
| CVE-2023-1090 | Medium | 2023-05-02 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The SMTP Mailing Queue WordPress plugin before 2.0.1 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
| CVE-2023-29323 | High | 2023-04-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ascii_load_sockaddr in smtpd in OpenBSD before 7.1 errata 024 and 7.2 before errata 020, and OpenSMTPD Portable before 7.0.0-portable commit f748277, can abort upon a connection from a local, scoped IPv6 address. |
| CVE-2023-0219 | Medium | 2023-03-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The FluentSMTP WordPress plugin before 2.2.3 does not sanitize or escape email content, making it vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting attacks (XSS) when an administrator views the email logs. This exploit requires other plugins to enable users to send emails with unfiltered HTML. |
| CVE-2022-45833 | Medium | 2022-12-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Auth. Path Traversal vulnerability in Easy WP SMTP plugin <= 1.5.1 on WordPress. |
| CVE-2022-45829 | High | 2022-12-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Auth. Path Traversal vulnerability in Easy WP SMTP plugin <= 1.5.1 at WordPress. |
| CVE-2022-42699 | Critical | 2022-12-06 | Not applicable | Exploited | Auth. Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Easy WP SMTP plugin <= 1.5.1 on WordPress. |
| CVE-2022-3334 | High | 2022-10-31 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The Easy WP SMTP WordPress plugin before 1.5.0 unserialises the content of an imported file, which could lead to PHP object injection issue when an admin import (intentionally or not) a malicious file and a suitable gadget chain is present on the blog. |
| CVE-2022-2352 | High | 2022-09-26 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | The Post SMTP Mailer/Email Log WordPress plugin before 2.1.7 does not have proper authorisation in some AJAX actions, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform blind SSRF on multisite installations for example. |
| CVE-2022-2351 | Medium | 2022-09-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Post SMTP Mailer/Email Log WordPress plugin before 2.1.4 does not escape some of its settings before outputting them in the admins dashboard, allowing high privilege users to perform Cross-Site Scripting attacks against other users even when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed. |
| CVE-2022-2372 | Medium | 2022-08-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The YaySMTP WordPress plugin before 2.2.2 does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks when the unfiltered_html capability is disallowed (for example in multisite setup) |
| CVE-2022-2371 | Medium | 2022-08-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The YaySMTP WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not have proper authorisation when saving its settings, allowing users with a role as low as subscriber to change them, and use that to conduct Stored Cross-Site Scripting attack due to the lack of escaping in them as well. |
| CVE-2022-2370 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The YaySMTP WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not have capability check before displaying the Mailer Credentials in JS code for the settings, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber to retrieve them |
| CVE-2022-2369 | Medium | 2022-08-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The YaySMTP WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not have capability check in an AJAX action, allowing any logged in users, such as subscriber to view the Logs of the plugin |
| CVE-2022-1612 | Medium | 2022-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Webriti SMTP Mail WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack |
| CVE-2021-24874 | Medium | 2022-02-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue WordPress plugin before 3.1.31 does not escape the lang and pid parameter before outputting them back in attributes, leading to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting issues |
| CVE-2021-24923 | Medium | 2022-01-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Newsletter, SMTP, Email marketing and Subscribe forms by Sendinblue WordPress plugin before 3.1.25 does not escape the sib-statistics-date parameter before outputting it back in an attribute, leading to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting issue |
| CVE-2021-24528 | Medium | 2021-08-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The FluentSMTP WordPress plugin before 2.0.1 does not sanitize parameters before storing the settings in the database, nor does the plugin escape the values before outputting them when viewing the SMTP settings set by this plugin, leading to a stored cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Only users with roles capable of managing plugins can modify the plugin's settings. |
| CVE-2021-29400 | Medium | 2021-08-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the My SMTP Contact v1.1.1 plugin for GetSimple CMS allows remote attackers to change the SMTP settings of the contact forms for the webpages of the CMS after an authenticated admin visits a malicious third-party site. |
| CVE-2020-35680 | High | 2020-12-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | smtpd/lka_filter.c in OpenSMTPD before 6.8.0p1, in certain configurations, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a crafted pattern of client activity, because the filter state machine does not properly maintain the I/O channel between the SMTP engine and the filters layer. |
| CVE-2020-35679 | High | 2020-12-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | smtpd/table.c in OpenSMTPD before 6.8.0p1 lacks a certain regfree, which might allow attackers to trigger a "very significant" memory leak via messages to an instance that performs many regex lookups. |
| CVE-2020-35234 | High | 2020-12-14 | Not applicable | Exploited | The easy-wp-smtp plugin before 1.4.4 for WordPress allows Administrator account takeover, as exploited in the wild in December 2020. If an attacker can list the wp-content/plugins/easy-wp-smtp/ directory, then they can discover a log file (such as #############_debug_log.txt) that contains all password-reset links. The attacker can request a reset of the Administrator password and then use a link found there. |
| CVE-2020-8794 | Critical | 2020-02-25 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | OpenSMTPD before 6.6.4 allows remote code execution because of an out-of-bounds read in mta_io in mta_session.c for multi-line replies. Although this vulnerability affects the client side of OpenSMTPD, it is possible to attack a server because the server code launches the client code during bounce handling. |
| CVE-2020-8793 | Medium | 2020-02-25 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | OpenSMTPD before 6.6.4 allows local users to read arbitrary files (e.g., on some Linux distributions) because of a combination of an untrusted search path in makemap.c and race conditions in the offline functionality in smtpd.c. |
| CVE-2020-7247 | Critical | 2020-01-29 | Not applicable | Exploited | smtp_mailaddr in smtp_session.c in OpenSMTPD 6.6, as used in OpenBSD 6.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root via a crafted SMTP session, as demonstrated by shell metacharacters in a MAIL FROM field. This affects the "uncommented" default configuration. The issue exists because of an incorrect return value upon failure of input validation. |
| CVE-2019-19977 | Critical | 2019-12-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | libESMTP through 1.0.6 mishandles domain copying into a fixed-size buffer in ntlm_build_type_2 in ntlm/ntlmstruct.c, as demonstrated by a stack-based buffer over-read. |
| CVE-2017-18603 | Medium | 2019-09-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The postman-smtp plugin through 2017-10-04 for WordPress has XSS via the wp-admin/tools.php?page=postman_email_log page parameter. |
| CVE-2017-18518 | Medium | 2019-08-20 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The bws-smtp plugin before 1.1.0 for WordPress has multiple XSS issues. |
| CVE-2019-8337 | Medium | 2019-02-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In msmtp 1.8.2 and mpop 1.4.3, when tls_trust_file has its default configuration, certificate-verification results are not properly checked. |
| CVE-2017-16659 | High | 2017-11-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Gentoo mail-filter/assp package 1.9.8.13030 and earlier allows local users to gain privileges by leveraging access to the assp user account to install a Trojan horse /usr/share/assp/assp.pl script. |
| CVE-2015-7687 | Critical | 2017-10-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use-after-free vulnerability in OpenSMTPD before 5.7.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via vectors involving req_ca_vrfy_smtp and req_ca_vrfy_mta. |
| CVE-2017-2171 | Medium | 2017-05-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Captcha prior to version 4.3.0, Car Rental prior to version 1.0.5, Contact Form Multi prior to version 1.2.1, Contact Form prior to version 4.0.6, Contact Form to DB prior to version 1.5.7, Custom Admin Page prior to version 0.1.2, Custom Fields Search prior to version 1.3.2, Custom Search prior to version 1.36, Donate prior to version 2.1.1, Email Queue prior to version 1.1.2, Error Log Viewer prior to version 1.0.6, Facebook Button prior to version 2.54, Featured Posts prior to version 1.0.1, Gallery Categories prior to version 1.0.9, Gallery prior to version 4.5.0, Google +1 prior to version 1.3.4, Google AdSense prior to version 1.44, Google Analytics prior to version 1.7.1, Google Captcha (reCAPTCHA) prior to version 1.28, Google Maps prior to version 1.3.6, Google Shortlink prior to version 1.5.3, Google Sitemap prior to version 3.0.8, Htaccess prior to version 1.7.6, Job Board prior to version 1.1.3, Latest Posts prior to version 0.3, Limit Attempts prior to version 1.1.8, LinkedIn prior to version 1.0.5, Multilanguage prior to version 1.2.2, PDF & Print prior to version 1.9.4, Pagination prior to version 1.0.7, Pinterest prior to version 1.0.5, Popular Posts prior to version 1.0.5, Portfolio prior to version 2.4, Post to CSV prior to version 1.3.1, Profile Extra prior to version 1.0.7. PromoBar prior to version 1.1.1, Quotes and Tips prior to version 1.32, Re-attacher prior to version 1.0.9, Realty prior to version 1.1.0, Relevant - Related Posts prior to version 1.2.0, Sender prior to version 1.2.1, SMTP prior to version 1.1.0, Social Buttons Pack prior to version 1.1.1, Subscriber prior to version 1.3.5, Testimonials prior to version 0.1.9, Timesheet prior to version 0.1.5, Twitter Button prior to version 2.55, User Role prior to version 1.5.6, Updater prior to version 1.35, Visitors Online prior to version 1.0.0, and Zendesk Help Center prior to version 1.0.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the function to display the BestWebSoft menu. |
| CVE-2017-7723 | Medium | 2017-04-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | XSS exists in Easy WP SMTP (before 1.2.5), a WordPress Plugin, via the e-mail subject or body. |
| CVE-2013-2125 | Medium | 2014-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | OpenSMTPD before 5.3.2 does not properly handle SSL sessions, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection blocking) by keeping a connection open. |
| CVE-2008-7258 | Low | 2010-08-20 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The standardise function in Anibal Monsalve Salazar sSMTP 2.61 and 2.62 allows local users to cause a denial of service (application exit) via an e-mail message containing a long line that begins with a . (dot) character. NOTE: CVE disputes this issue because it is solely a usability problem for senders of messages with certain long lines, and has no security impact |
| CVE-2010-1194 | Medium | 2010-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The match_component function in smtp-tls.c in libESMTP 1.0.3.r1, and possibly other versions including 1.0.4, treats two strings as equal if one is a substring of the other, which allows remote attackers to spoof trusted certificates via a crafted subjectAltName. |
| CVE-2010-1192 | Medium | 2010-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | libESMTP, probably 1.0.4 and earlier, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. |
| CVE-2009-3942 | Medium | 2009-11-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Martin Lambers msmtp before 1.4.19, when OpenSSL is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the (1) subject's Common Name or (2) Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. |
| CVE-2008-2831 | Low | 2008-10-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the delegated spam management feature in the Spam Quarantine Management (SQM) component in MailMarshal SMTP 6.0.3.8 through 6.3.0.0 allow user-assisted remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) the list of blocked senders or (2) the list of safe senders. |
| CVE-2008-3962 | Low | 2008-09-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The from_format function in ssmtp.c in ssmtp 2.61 and 2.62, in certain configurations, uses uninitialized memory for the From: field of an e-mail message, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (memory contents) in opportunistic circumstances by reading a message. |
| CVE-2008-1438 | Medium | 2008-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine (mpengine.dll) 1.1.3520.0 and 0.1.13.192, as used in multiple Microsoft products, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (disk space exhaustion) via a file with "crafted data structures" that trigger the creation of large temporary files, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-1437. |
| CVE-2008-1437 | Medium | 2008-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine (mpengine.dll) 1.1.3520.0 and 0.1.13.192, as used in multiple Microsoft products, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (engine hang and restart) via a crafted file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-1438. |
| CVE-2008-0394 | High | 2008-01-23 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in Citadel SMTP server 7.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long RCPT TO command, which is not properly handled by the makeuserkey function. NOTE: some of these details were obtained from third party information. |
| CVE-2007-6573 | High | 2007-12-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | QK SMTP Server 3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a long (1) HELO, (2) MAIL FROM, or (3) RCPT TO command; or (4) a long string in the message sent after the DATA command; possibly a related issue to CVE-2006-5551. |
| CVE-2007-3796 | High | 2007-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The password reset feature in the Spam Quarantine HTTP interface for MailMarshal SMTP 6.2.0.x before 6.2.1 allows remote attackers to modify arbitrary account information via a UserId variable with a large amount of trailing whitespace followed by a malicious value, which triggers SQL buffer truncation due to length inconsistencies between variables. |
| CVE-2006-5487 | High | 2006-11-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Directory traversal vulnerability in Marshal MailMarshal SMTP 5.x, 6.x, and 2006, and MailMarshal for Exchange 5.x, allows remote attackers to write arbitrary files via ".." sequences in filenames in an ARJ compressed archive. |
| CVE-2006-5551 | High | 2006-10-26 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in QK SMTP 3.01 and earlier might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the RCPT TO command. |
| CVE-2006-4258 | Medium | 2006-08-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Absolute path traversal vulnerability in the get functionality in Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy (ASSP) allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via (1) C:\ (Windows drive letter), (2) UNC, and possibly other types of paths in the file parameter. |
| CVE-2006-3216 | Medium | 2006-06-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Clearswift MAILsweeper for SMTP before 4.3.20 and MAILsweeper for Exchange before 4.3.20 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via (1) non-ASCII characters in a reverse DNS lookup result from a Received header, which leads to a Receiver service stop, and (2) unspecified vectors involving malformed messages, which causes "unpredictable behavior" that prevents the Security service from processing more messages. |
| CVE-2006-3215 | High | 2006-06-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Clearswift MAILsweeper for SMTP before 4.3.20 and MAILsweeper for Exchange before 4.3.20 allows remote attackers to bypass the "text analysis", possibly bypassing SPAM and other filters, by sending an e-mail specifying a non-existent or unrecognized character set. |
| CVE-2006-2107 | High | 2006-04-29 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in BL4 SMTP Server 0.1.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a long argument to the (1) EHLO, (2) MAIL FROM, and (3) RCPT TO commands. |
| CVE-2006-0559 | High | 2006-04-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Format string vulnerability in the SMTP server for McAfee WebShield 4.5 MR2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format strings in the domain name portion of a destination address, which are not properly handled when a bounce message is constructed. |
| CVE-2006-0447 | High | 2006-01-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple buffer overflows in E-Post Mail Server 4.10 and SPA-PRO Mail @Solomon 4.00 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long username to the (1) AUTH PLAIN or (2) AUTH LOGIN SMTP commands, which is not properly handled by (a) EPSTRS.EXE or (b) SPA-RS.EXE; (3) a long username in the APOP POP3 command, which is not properly handled by (c) EPSTPOP4S.EXE or (d) SPA-POP3S.EXE; (4) a long IMAP DELETE command, which is not properly handled by (e) EPSTIMAP4S.EXE or (f) SPA-IMAP4S.EXE. |
| CVE-2005-4324 | High | 2005-12-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Hitachi Groupmax Mail SMTP 06-50 through 06-52-/A and 07-00 through 07-20 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service stop) via an e-mail message with an "invalid format." |
| CVE-2005-2857 | High | 2005-09-08 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Free SMTP Server 2.2 allows remote attackers to use the server as an open mail relay (spam proxy). |
| CVE-2005-2409 | High | 2005-08-01 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Format string vulnerability in util.c in nbsmtp 0.99 and earlier, while running in debug mode, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers that are not properly handled in a syslog call. |
| CVE-2005-2387 | High | 2005-07-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in GoodTech SMTP server 5.16 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a RCPT TO command with a long DNS name, or (2) a large number of RCPT TO commands with a long e-mail name arugment in the last command. |
| CVE-2005-1931 | Medium | 2005-07-05 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | GoodTech SMTP Server 5.14 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a RCPT TO command with an invalid argument, as demonstrated using an "A" character. |
| CVE-2005-0107 | High | 2005-02-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | bsmtpd 2.3 and earlier does not properly sanitize e-mail addresses, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands. |
| CVE-2004-1291 | High | 2005-01-10 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in qwik-smtpd allows remote attackers to use the server as an SMTP spam relay via a long HELO command, which overwrites the adjacent localIP data buffer. |
| CVE-2004-2703 | Medium | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Clearswift MIMEsweeper 5.0.5, when it has been upgraded from MAILsweeper for SMTP version 4.3 or MAILsweeper Business Suite I or II, allows remote attackers to bypass scanning by including encrypted data in a mail message, which causes the message to be marked as "Clean" instead of "Encrypted". |
| CVE-2004-2677 | High | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Format string vulnerability in qwik-smtpd.c in QwikMail SMTP (qwik-smtpd) 0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format specifiers in the (1) clientRcptTo array, and the (2) Received and (3) messageID variables, possibly involving HELO and hostname arguments. |
| CVE-2004-2417 | High | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Format string vulnerability in smtp.c for smtp.proxy 1.1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the (1) client hostname or (2) message-id, which are injected into a syslog message. |