Overview 11 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 2 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 5 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
11matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
2exploited18.2%
2CISA KEV18.2%
5public PoC45.5%
4EPSS ≥ 0.536.4%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
11
100.0%
Not applicable
0
0.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
11
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 5 / quarter
Q2 151
Outside Waratek scope1
Low1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q3 150
Q4 150
Q1 160
Q2 160
Q3 160
Q4 160
Q1 170
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 171
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q1 181
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 180
Q3 181
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
Q4 180
Q1 191
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 190
Q3 195
Outside Waratek scope5
High5
not blocked5
Exploited1
No public exploit4
Q4 191
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q2 15Q4 15Q2 16Q4 16Q2 17Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-2215 | High | 2019-10-11 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A use-after-free in binder.c allows an elevation of privilege from an application to the Linux Kernel. No user interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability, however exploitation does require either the installation of a malicious local application or a separate vulnerability in a network facing application.Product: AndroidAndroid ID: A-141720095 |
| CVE-2019-16995 | High | 2019-09-30 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In the Linux kernel before 5.0.3, a memory leak exits in hsr_dev_finalize() in net/hsr/hsr_device.c if hsr_add_port fails to add a port, which may cause denial of service, aka CID-6caabe7f197d. |
| CVE-2019-14816 | High | 2019-09-20 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | There is heap-based buffer overflow in kernel, all versions up to, excluding 5.3, in the marvell wifi chip driver in Linux kernel, that allows local users to cause a denial of service(system crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2019-14814 | High | 2019-09-20 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | There is heap-based buffer overflow in Linux kernel, all versions up to, excluding 5.3, in the marvell wifi chip driver in Linux kernel, that allows local users to cause a denial of service(system crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code. |
| CVE-2019-14835 | High | 2019-09-17 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A buffer overflow flaw was found, in versions from 2.6.34 to 5.2.x, in the way Linux kernel's vhost functionality that translates virtqueue buffers to IOVs, logged the buffer descriptors during migration. A privileged guest user able to pass descriptors with invalid length to the host when migration is underway, could use this flaw to increase their privileges on the host. |
| CVE-2019-13272 | High | 2019-07-17 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In the Linux kernel before 5.1.17, ptrace_link in kernel/ptrace.c mishandles the recording of the credentials of a process that wants to create a ptrace relationship, which allows local users to obtain root access by leveraging certain scenarios with a parent-child process relationship, where a parent drops privileges and calls execve (potentially allowing control by an attacker). One contributing factor is an object lifetime issue (which can also cause a panic). Another contributing factor is incorrect marking of a ptrace relationship as privileged, which is exploitable through (for example) Polkit's pkexec helper with PTRACE_TRACEME. NOTE: SELinux deny_ptrace might be a usable workaround in some environments. |
| CVE-2019-1559 | Medium | 2019-02-27 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q). |
| CVE-2018-15473 | Medium | 2018-08-17 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | OpenSSH through 7.7 is prone to a user enumeration vulnerability due to not delaying bailout for an invalid authenticating user until after the packet containing the request has been fully parsed, related to auth2-gss.c, auth2-hostbased.c, and auth2-pubkey.c. |
| CVE-2016-10708 | High | 2018-01-21 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | sshd in OpenSSH before 7.4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via an out-of-sequence NEWKEYS message, as demonstrated by Honggfuzz, related to kex.c and packet.c. |
| CVE-2016-8610 | High | 2017-11-13 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. |
| CVE-2015-4000 | Low | 2015-05-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. |