Overview 21 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
21matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
1public PoC4.8%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
21
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
21
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
1
4.8%
Proof of concept only
6
28.6%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
14
66.7%
split by
peak 5 / year
20081
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20090
20100
20110
20122
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20130
20141
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20151
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20160
20171
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20180
20190
20200
20210
20223
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20232
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20245
Not applicable5
Medium5
not blocked5
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit3
20252
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
20263
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
Proof of concept only3
2008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-26004 | Medium | 2026-03-18 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Sentry is a developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring tool. Versions prior to 26.1.0 have a cross-organization Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Sentry's GroupEventJsonView endpoint. Version 26.1.0 patches the issue. |
| CVE-2019-25279 | Medium | 2026-01-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | FaceSentry Access Control System 6.4.8 contains a cleartext password storage vulnerability that allows attackers to access unencrypted credentials in the device's SQLite database. Attackers can directly read sensitive login information stored in /faceGuard/database/FaceSentryWeb.sqlite without additional authentication. |
| CVE-2019-25277 | Medium | 2026-01-08 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | FaceSentry Access Control System 6.4.8 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the 'msg' parameter of pluginInstall.php that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts. Attackers can exploit the unvalidated input to execute arbitrary JavaScript in victim browsers, potentially stealing authentication credentials and conducting phishing attacks. |
| CVE-2019-25242 | Medium | 2025-12-24 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | FaceSentry Access Control System 6.4.8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user consent. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to change administrator passwords, add new admin users, or open access control doors by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted webpage. |
| CVE-2025-53099 | Medium | 2025-07-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sentry is a developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring tool. Prior to version 25.5.0, an attacker with a malicious OAuth application registered with Sentry can take advantage of a race condition and improper handling of authorization code within Sentry to maintain persistence to a user's account. With a specially timed requests and redirect flows, an attacker could generate multiple authorization codes that could be used to exchange for access and refresh tokens. This was possible even after de-authorizing the particular application. This issue has been patched in version 25.5.0. Self-hosted Sentry users should upgrade to version 25.5.0 or higher. Sentry SaaS users do not need to take any action. |
| CVE-2024-53253 | Medium | 2024-11-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sentry is an error tracking and performance monitoring platform. Version 24.11.0, and only version 24.11.0, is vulnerable to a scenario where a specific error message generated by the Sentry platform could include a plaintext Client ID and Client Secret for an application integration. The Client ID and Client Secret would not be displayed in the UI, but would be returned in the underlying HTTP response to the end user. This could occur under the following conditions: An app installation made use of a Search UI component with the `async` flag set to true (default: true); auser types types into the Search Component which creates a request to the third-party for search or query results; and that third-party response may then fail validation and Sentry would return the `select-requester.invalid-response` error code along with a serialized version of a Sentry application containing the integration Client Secret. Should this error be found, it's reasonable to assume the potential exposure of an integration Client Secret. However, an ID and Secret pair alone does not provide direct access to any data. For that secret to be abused an attacker would also need to obtain a valid API token for a Sentry application. Sentry SaaS users do not need to take any action. For Sentry SaaS users, only a single application integration was impacted and the owner has rotated their Client Secret. No abuse of the leaked Client Secret has occurred. As of time of publication, a fix is available for users of Sentry self-hosted in pull request 81038. Sentry self-hosted does not ship with any application integrations. This could only impact self-hosted users that maintain their own integrations. In that case, search for a `select-requester.invalid-response` event. Please note that this error was also shared with another event unrelated to this advisory so Sentry self-hosted users will also need to review the parameters logged for each named event. Sentry self-hosted users may review `select_requester.py` for the instances where these errors can be generated. With the security fix this is no longer a shared event type. Sentry self-hosted users may not install version 24.11.0 and instead wait for the next release. Self-hosted instance that are already running the affected version may consider downgrading to to 24.10.0. |
| CVE-2024-48743 | Medium | 2024-10-25 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in Sentry v.6.0.9 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the z parameter. |
| CVE-2024-10276 | Medium | 2024-10-23 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability has been found in Telestream Sentry 6.0.9 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /?page=reports of the component Reports Page. The manipulation of the argument z leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2024-45605 | Medium | 2024-09-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sentry is a developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring platform. An authenticated user delete the user issue alert notifications for arbitrary users given a know alert ID. A patch was issued to ensure authorization checks are properly scoped on requests to delete user alert notifications. Sentry SaaS users do not need to take any action. Self-Hosted Sentry users should upgrade to version 24.9.0 or higher. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2024-24829 | Medium | 2024-02-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sentry is an error tracking and performance monitoring platform. Sentry’s integration platform provides a way for external services to interact with Sentry. One of such integrations, the Phabricator integration (maintained by Sentry) with version <=24.1.1 contains a constrained SSRF vulnerability. An attacker could make Sentry send POST HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs (including internal IP addresses) by providing an unsanitized input to the Phabricator integration. However, the body payload is constrained to a specific format. If an attacker has access to a Sentry instance, this allows them to: 1. interact with internal network; 2. scan local/remote ports. This issue has been fixed in Sentry self-hosted release 24.1.2, and has already been mitigated on sentry.io on February 8. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-39531 | Medium | 2023-08-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sentry is an error tracking and performance monitoring platform. Starting in version 10.0.0 and prior to version 23.7.2, an attacker with sufficient client-side exploits could retrieve a valid access token for another user during the OAuth token exchange due to incorrect credential validation. The client ID must be known and the API application must have already been authorized on the targeted user account. Sentry SaaS customers do not need to take any action. Self-hosted installations should upgrade to version 23.7.2 or higher. There are no direct workarounds, but users should review applications authorized on their account and remove any that are no longer needed. |
| CVE-2023-36829 | Medium | 2023-07-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sentry is an error tracking and performance monitoring platform. Starting in version 23.6.0 and prior to version 23.6.2, the Sentry API incorrectly returns the `access-control-allow-credentials: true` HTTP header if the `Origin` request header ends with the `system.base-hostname` option of Sentry installation. This only affects installations that have `system.base-hostname` option explicitly set, as it is empty by default. Impact is limited since recent versions of major browsers have cross-site cookie blocking enabled by default. However, this flaw could allow other multi-step attacks. The patch has been released in Sentry 23.6.2. |
| CVE-2022-23485 | Medium | 2022-12-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sentry is an error tracking and performance monitoring platform. In versions of the sentry python library prior to 22.11.0 an attacker with a known valid invite link could manipulate a cookie to allow the same invite link to be reused on multiple accounts when joining an organization. As a result an attacker with a valid invite link can create multiple users and join an organization they may not have been originally invited to. This issue was patched in version 22.11.0. Sentry SaaS customers do not need to take action. Self-hosted Sentry installs on systems which can not upgrade can disable the invite functionality until they are ready to deploy the patched version by editing their `sentry.conf.py` file (usually located at `~/.sentry/`). |
| CVE-2022-38107 | Medium | 2022-10-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive information could be displayed when a detailed technical error message is posted. This information could disclose environmental details. |
| CVE-2022-1844 | Medium | 2022-06-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The WP Sentry WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack and lead to Stored Cross-Site Scripting due to the lack of sanitisation and escaping as well |
| CVE-2016-5077 | Medium | 2017-04-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Netikus EventSentry before 3.2.1.44 has XSS via SNMP. |
| CVE-2015-1180 | Medium | 2015-01-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web Reports in EventSentry 3.1.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the pageId parameter to networktile/bullet. |
| CVE-2014-8608 | Medium | 2014-12-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The K7Sentry.sys kernel mode driver (aka K7AV Sentry Device Driver) before 12.8.0.119, as used in multiple K7 Computing products, allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) as demonstrated by a filename containing "crashme$$". |
| CVE-2012-2606 | Medium | 2012-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The agent in Bradford Network Sentry before 5.3.3 does not require authentication for messages, which allows remote attackers to trigger the display of arbitrary text on a workstation via a crafted packet to UDP port 4567, as demonstrated by a replay attack. |
| CVE-2012-2605 | Medium | 2012-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the administrative interface in Bradford Network Sentry before 5.3.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) insert XSS sequences or (2) send messages to clients. |
| CVE-2008-1321 | Medium | 2008-03-13 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The FxIAList service in ASG-Sentry Network Manager 7.0.0 and earlier does require authentication, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service termination) via the exit command to TCP port 6162, or have other impacts via other commands. |