Overview 4,125 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 49 exploited · 32 CISA KEV · 253 public PoC · 80 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4,125matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
49exploited1.2%
32CISA KEV0.8%
253public PoC6.1%
80EPSS ≥ 0.51.9%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
4,125
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4,125
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 395 / year
19992
Not applicable2
High1
Low1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
200011
Not applicable11
High4
Medium6
Low1
not blocked11
Working exploit published2
No public exploit9
20013
Not applicable3
High2
Low1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
200212
Not applicable12
High5
Medium6
Low1
not blocked12
Working exploit published1
No public exploit11
20036
Not applicable6
High3
Medium3
not blocked6
Working exploit published3
No public exploit3
200429
Not applicable29
High10
Medium16
Low3
not blocked29
Working exploit published7
No public exploit22
200544
Not applicable44
High21
Medium18
Low5
not blocked44
Working exploit published4
No public exploit40
200656
Not applicable56
High17
Medium38
Low1
not blocked56
Working exploit published19
No public exploit37
200794
Not applicable94
Critical2
High49
Medium37
Low6
not blocked94
Working exploit published16
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit76
200856
Not applicable56
Critical1
High40
Medium15
not blocked56
Working exploit published8
No public exploit48
200980
Not applicable80
High42
Medium36
Low2
not blocked80
Exploited2
Working exploit published20
Forecast only1
No public exploit57
201033
Not applicable33
High18
Medium13
Low2
not blocked33
Working exploit published5
No public exploit28
201147
Not applicable47
High35
Medium11
Low1
not blocked47
Working exploit published3
No public exploit44
2012127
Not applicable127
Critical1
High30
Medium89
Low7
not blocked127
Working exploit published10
Forecast only11
No public exploit106
201398
Not applicable98
High33
Medium54
Low11
not blocked98
Working exploit published3
No public exploit95
2014166
Not applicable166
Critical2
High45
Medium108
Low11
not blocked166
Exploited5
Working exploit published10
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit150
2015123
Not applicable123
High43
Medium74
Low6
not blocked123
Working exploit published10
No public exploit113
2016154
Not applicable154
Critical9
High76
Medium62
Low7
not blocked154
Exploited4
Working exploit published11
Forecast only1
No public exploit138
2017289
Not applicable289
Critical27
High125
Medium128
Low9
not blocked289
Exploited1
Working exploit published33
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit253
2018304
Not applicable304
Critical18
High143
Medium137
Low6
not blocked304
Exploited3
Working exploit published17
Forecast only1
No public exploit283
2019342
Not applicable342
Critical35
High146
Medium156
Low5
not blocked342
Exploited1
Working exploit published4
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only3
No public exploit333
2020393
Not applicable393
Critical32
High158
Medium190
Low13
not blocked393
Exploited3
Working exploit published4
Forecast only7
No public exploit379
2021395
Not applicable395
Critical28
High166
Medium190
Low11
not blocked395
Exploited9
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only2
No public exploit379
2022351
Not applicable351
Critical53
High152
Medium137
Low9
not blocked351
Exploited4
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only45
No public exploit297
2023279
Not applicable279
Critical25
High148
Medium103
Low3
not blocked279
Exploited6
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only28
Forecast only3
No public exploit239
2024284
Not applicable284
Critical43
High123
Medium112
Low6
not blocked284
Exploited4
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only49
No public exploit226
2025184
Not applicable184
Critical21
High86
Medium70
Low7
not blocked184
Exploited2
Proof of concept only34
No public exploit148
2026163
Not applicable163
Critical22
High88
Medium47
Low6
not blocked163
Exploited5
Working exploit published3
Proof of concept only19
No public exploit136
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-116606 | Critical | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | Exploited | An authentication bypass in Barracuda Email Security Gateway versions earlier than 9.4.0.030 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to invoke a configuration-import function and restore a crafted, compatible backup archive, resulting in unauthorized modification of the appliance’s global configuration. |
| CVE-2026-111560 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper neutralization of shell metacharacters in the timezone configuration field in certain Barracuda appliance products using common Barracuda code allows an authenticated administrator to inject OS commands that execute with root privileges when the crafted timezone value is subsequently processed. |
| CVE-2026-85922 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Weak authentication in Azure Key Vault allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. |
| CVE-2026-105725 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use after free in Windows Security App allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-78407 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 are vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2026-78406 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system due to the deserialization of untrusted data. |
| CVE-2026-78401 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system due to the deserialization of untrusted data. |
| CVE-2026-78399 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service using a specially crafted HTTP query due to improper allocation of system resources |
| CVE-2026-78388 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
| CVE-2026-19878 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass additional authentication workflow steps. |
| CVE-2026-19498 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled recursion. |
| CVE-2026-19494 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. |
| CVE-2026-19493 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to perform an arbitrary file write due to path traversal. |
| CVE-2026-19491 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication due to improper authentication. |
| CVE-2026-19482 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of command arguments. |
| CVE-2026-18740 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to argument injection. |
| CVE-2026-17189 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session |
| CVE-2026-16916 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a protection mechanism failure. |
| CVE-2026-16830 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify data and cause a denial of service due to an SQL injection vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-16823 | Critical | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. |
| CVE-2026-12109 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an attacker with administrative privileges and access to the local management interface to execute arbitrary code due to an unbounded write to a fixed-size stack buffer. |
| CVE-2026-12091 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a denial of service due to a heap-based out-of-bounds read. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted request that causes a limited out‑of‑bounds memory read. |
| CVE-2026-11939 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 may be vulnerable to audit log forgery. |
| CVE-2026-11936 | Medium | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 local management interface in certain configurations is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| CVE-2026-11930 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 may not enforce authorization correctly for some web servers. |
| CVE-2026-11888 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an information disclosure attack. |
| CVE-2026-13043 | Critical | 2026-10-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A missing authentication vulnerability in the Kernel Memory Access Driver (PSKMAD) used by WatchGuard endpoint security products allows a local, authenticated attacker to bypass the driver's access-control handshake and issue arbitrary privileged commands to the driver, resulting in disclosure of kernel and process memory. |
| CVE-2026-94251 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Apache Sling Security Bundle: ContentDispositionFilter mediates only one address/API shape of a resource This issue affects Apache Sling Security Bundle: before 1.3.12. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.12, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-94243 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Apache Sling Security Bundle: the ReferrerFilter accepts weaker-than-orgin evidence. This issue affects Apache Sling Security Bundle: before 1.3.2. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.2, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-93616 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | A directory traversal and file upload vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload and execute arbitrary scripts on Check Point Management Server. |
| CVE-2026-63020 | Low | 2026-09-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in an undisclosed BIG-IP Configuration utility page that may allow an attacker to spoof error messages Impact: An attacker may trick authenticated BIG-IP users into accessing malicious links and reflect a spoofed error message in the victim's BIG-IP Configuration utility web browser session. This is a control plane issue; there is no data plane exposure. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-76390 | Medium | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cisco Talos Intelligence for Enterprise Security Cloud versions below 1.0.3, an unauthenticated user could access the add-on OpenAPI specification through Splunk Web static file paths. The exposed specification could allow for reconnaissance of the add-on Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoints and authentication model. The vulnerability is possible because the generated OpenAPI specification is packaged in a static file path that Splunk Web serves without authentication. For more information see Deploy Cisco Talos Intelligence for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.0/introduction/deploy-cisco-talos-intelligence-for-splunk-enterprise-security-cloud-only) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-76389 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cisco Talos Intelligence for Enterprise Security Cloud versions below 1.0.3, a user that holds a role with the get_talos_enrichment capability could send a crafted request to the Talos intelligence enrichment Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoint and cause the instance to make an outbound request to an attacker-controlled server. The request could expose tokens that compromise all relevant data and system integrity in the Splunk instance. The vulnerability is possible because the Talos intelligence enrichment REST endpoint accepts the destination for authenticated Splunk management requests from request data. For more information see Deploy Cisco Talos Intelligence for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.0/introduction/deploy-cisco-talos-intelligence-for-splunk-enterprise-security-cloud-only) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-76388 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise Security versions below 8.6.1, a user who holds the ess_analyst Splunk Enterprise Security role could change User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) search macros that scheduled searches run with administrator permissions, allowing for access to all relevant data and system integrity through those searches. The vulnerability is possible because the UEBA app metadata grants analyst roles write access to search macros that should be writable only by administrator roles. For more information see Users and roles for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/install/8.4/installation/users-and-roles-for-splunk-enterprise-security) and Roles and knowledge objects in UEBA for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/administer/8.5/user-and-entity-behavior-analytics/roles-and-knowledge-objects-in-ueba-for-splunk-enterprise-security) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-76387 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise Security versions below 8.6.1, a user who holds a Splunk Enterprise Security role that contains the mc_investigation_read capability could inject Search Processing Language (SPL) through Analyst Queue search filters, allowing for access to all relevant data and system integrity available to the scheduled searches that run for that user. The vulnerability is possible because the Analyst Queue search filter handling does not validate filter field names before the fields are included in SPL searches. For more information see Users and roles for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/install/8.4/installation/users-and-roles-for-splunk-enterprise-security), Manage analyst workflows using the analyst queue in Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/administer/8.4/mission-control/manage-analyst-workflows-using-the-analyst-queue-in-splunk-enterprise-security), and Overview of Mission Control in Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.5/mission-control/overview-of-mission-control-in-splunk-enterprise-security) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-19682 | Critical | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A command injection vulnerability exists in Security Center where a remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit this issue to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the service account. |
| CVE-2026-19681 | Critical | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | An authenticated command injection vulnerability exists in Security Center related to file upload processing. An attacker could exploit this issue by uploading a specially crafted file, potentially resulting in arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system. |
| CVE-2026-19680 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A SQL injection vulnerability exists in Security Center that could allow an attacker to access unauthorized data from the application's database. |
| CVE-2026-19679 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An input validation vulnerability exists in Security Center's file upload handling, where insufficient sanitization of uploaded filenames could contribute to a downstream command injection issue. |
| CVE-2026-19639 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper access control vulnerability exists where an authenticated non-administrative application user could potentially view settings outside of their assigned scope. |
| CVE-2026-19636 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was identified in which CSRF tokens were generated using a predictable method, potentially reducing their effectiveness as a security control. This has been addressed by improving the randomness and entropy of token generation. |
| CVE-2026-19635 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Security Center. An attacker with write access to a specific configuration file could achieve arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges, without requiring further user or victim interaction. |
| CVE-2026-19631 | Medium | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A SQL injection vulnerability exists in Security Center that could allow an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary SQL queries, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to sensitive data, including credentials. |
| CVE-2026-19629 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center that allows a user with "Security Manager" role and "manage user" permission on a single group to modify users belonging to other groups. This bypasses the intended access control restrictions and enables unauthorized cross-group user management. |
| CVE-2026-19628 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A command injection vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center. An authenticated administrator could modify application configuration values to achieve arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system when specific backend operations are triggered. |
| CVE-2026-19626 | Critical | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center's report generation functionality. An authenticated, non-administrative user could exploit this issue by supplying specially crafted input that is later processed unsafely during server-side report rendering, resulting in arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the service account. |
| CVE-2026-17616 | Critical | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 Reverse Proxy in certain configurations may provide weaker than expected cryptographic validation of user supplied data. |
| CVE-2026-13267 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an authenticated user to gain privileges of another user via a specially crafted request. |
| CVE-2026-12618 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an administrator to execute additional commands they are not entitled to due to improper validation of user supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-12359 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy. |
| CVE-2026-12005 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 contains a input validation vulnerability in the management interface that allows already privileged attackers to execute additional operations by crafting a malicious HTTP request. |
| CVE-2026-12004 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 contains a format string injection vulnerability in the management interface that allows attackers to cause denial of service and information disclosure by crafting a malicious HTTP request. |
| CVE-2026-11937 | Low | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 Reverse Proxy in certain configurations is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2026-11932 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2026-11923 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 Reverse Proxy in certain configurations may provide weaker than expected cryptographic validation of user supplied data. |
| CVE-2026-13477 | High | 2026-08-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar 7.6.0.0 through 7.6.0.1, and 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 UP 15 Interim Fix 005 could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-10025 | Critical | 2026-08-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar 7.6.0.0 through 7.6.0.1, and 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 UP 15 Interim Fix 005 has an XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability. The vulnerability resides in the parseXmlPayload() function within the event processing pipeline ( q1labs_core.jar ). When at least one log source type is configured to use XML-format property autodetection, the system processes XML-formatted syslog events sent to port 514 (UDP/TCP) without authentication. |
| CVE-2026-16232 | Critical | 2026-07-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | An authentication bypass vulnerability in the Check Point SmartConsole login process allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain an application login token and use it to authenticate with full administrative privileges. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to modify security policies and security configurations. Remote exploitation requires internet access to the Management Server IP address and a configuration that does not restrict Trusted Clients. Check Point is aware that this vulnerability is being exploited and has affected a very small number of customers. |
| CVE-2026-64881 | High | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The audit file upload handler does not sanitize filenames, allowing shell metacharacters to flow into system command execution. This input validation failure enables command injection when chained with a related vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-64880 | High | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unsanitized user-supplied input in report filtering parameters is concatenated directly into SQL queries without proper escaping or parameterized queries, enabling blind SQL injection and unauthorized database read access. |
| CVE-2026-64879 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A filename supplied during file upload is not properly sanitized before being used in system command execution, allowing an attacker to inject shell metacharacters and achieve command injection via the audit file upload functionality. |
| CVE-2026-64878 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unvalidated input in asset filter parameters allows shell metacharacters to escape command argument handling, resulting in remote code execution as a low-privileged OS user via the Analysis REST endpoint. |
| CVE-2026-64877 | Critical | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated non-admin user can exploit a SQL injection flaw in the ticketing REST API to access sensitive data stored in the appliance database. |
| CVE-2026-8861 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. |
| CVE-2026-7364 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a remote attacker to conduct phishing attacks, caused by an open redirect vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability using a specially crafted request to redirect a victim to arbitrary Web sites. |
| CVE-2026-4938 | Medium | 2026-07-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow an attacker with read-only privileges to make unauthorized modifications and deployments outside of their assigned permissions. |
| CVE-2026-6851 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') vulnerability in the File Shredder module as used in Bitdefender Total Security and Internet Security on Windows allows a less-privileged local user to elevate rights by leveraging a race conditions via Symbolic Links. This issue affects Total Security: before 27.0.58.315; Internet Security: before 27.0.58.315. |
| CVE-2026-52761 | Medium | 2026-07-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ModSecurity is an open source, cross platform web application firewall (WAF) engine for Apache, IIS and Nginx. From 3.0.0 through 3.0.15, the t:utf8toUnicode transformation in src/actions/transformations/utf8_to_unicode.cc produces wrong output on i386 architecture because snprintf uses sizeof on a char pointer rather than the length of the unicode buffer, allowing rules that use this transformation to be bypassed on i386 architecture. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.16. |
| CVE-2026-52747 | High | 2026-07-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ModSecurity is an open source, cross platform web application firewall (WAF) engine for Apache, IIS and Nginx. Prior to 3.0.16, the multipart/form-data request body parser in libmodsecurity silently removes embedded line breaks from non-file form-field values before exporting them to ARGS and ARGS_POST because src/request_body_processor/multipart.cc overwrites reserved bytes in m_reserve instead of appending the current buffer. This creates a parser differential between ModSecurity and backend applications that preserve line breaks in form fields, allowing rules that inspect ARGS or ARGS_POST to miss payloads whose dangerous syntax depends on a line break. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.16. |
| CVE-2026-56152 | Medium | 2026-07-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized information disclosure via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). Under certain conditions, a low-privileged authenticated user can access response action data that they are not authorized to view. |
| CVE-2026-44495 | High | 2026-06-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 0.19.0 to before 0.31.1 and 1.15.2, Axios contains prototype-pollution gadgets in request config processing. If another vulnerability in the same JavaScript process has already polluted Object.prototype.transformResponse, affected Axios versions may treat that inherited value as request configuration or as an option validator. Axios does not itself create the prototype pollution. Exploitability requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability or equivalent attacker control over Object.prototype before Axios creates a request. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1 and 1.15.2. |
| CVE-2024-45636 | Medium | 2026-06-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security QRadar EDR 3.12 through 3.12.24 stores user credentials in plain text which can be read by a local privileged user. |
| CVE-2026-0274 | High | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper validation of credentials vulnerability in the CommvaultSecurityIQ integration for Cortex XSOAR and Cortex XSIAM allows an unauthenticated attacker to access and modify protected resources. |
| CVE-2024-56462 | High | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 UP15 Interim Fix 002 could allow a privileged user to upload a malicious backup archive that could be restored and used to gain access to the underlying operating system. |
| CVE-2024-28765 | Medium | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM SDI 7.2.0.0 through 7.2.0.14 and IBM Security Directory Integrator 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. |
| CVE-2026-42937 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect permission assignment vulnerabilities exist in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ TMOS Shell (tmsh) arp and ndp commands, and in BIG-IP iControl REST. These vulnerabilities may allow an authenticated attacker to view adjacent network information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42930 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker assigned the 'Administrator' role may be able to bypass Appliance mode restrictions on a BIG-IP system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42924 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role can create SNMP configuration objects through iControl SOAP resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42920 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a Client SSL profile is configured with Allow Dynamic Record Sizing on a UDP virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42919 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP systems that may allow an authenticated attacker with administrative access to escalate their privileges. A successful exploit may allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42781 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When embedded Packet Velocity Acceleration (ePVA) acceleration is configured, undisclosed local ethernet traffic can cause an increase in ePVA and Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42409 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When an HTTP/2 profile and an iRule containing the HTTP::redirect or HTTP::respond command are configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42408 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When BIG-IP DNS is provisioned, a vulnerability exists in an undisclosed TMOS Shell (tmsh) command that may allow a highly privileged authenticated attacker to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42406 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Certificate Manager role can modify configuration objects that allow running arbitrary commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42063 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in iControl SOAP where an authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role can download sensitive files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42058 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker's undisclosed requests to BIG-IP iControl REST can lead to an information leak of BIG-IP local user account names. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41959 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect permission assignment vulnerabilities exist in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ TMOS Shell (tmsh) network diagnostics commands and in BIG-IP iControl REST. These vulnerabilities may allow an authenticated attacker to view the network status of destination systems. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41957 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability through undisclosed vectors exists in the BIG-IP and BIG-IQ Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41956 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a classification profile is configured on a UDP virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41954 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive information disclosure vulnerability exists in the undisclosed iControl REST endpoint and TMOS Shell (tmsh) command which may allow an authenticated attacker with resource administrator role privileges to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41953 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Resource Administrator role can modify configuration objects resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41227 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On an HTTP/2 virtual server with Layer 7 DoS Protection configured, undisclosed traffic can result in an increase in memory consumption causing the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41225 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in iControl REST where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Manager role can create configuration objects that allow running arbitrary commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41219 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper sanitization vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP QKView utility that allows a low-privileged attacker to read sensitive information from a QKView file. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2026-41218 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When BIG-IP PEM iRules are configured on a virtual server (iRules using commands starting with CLASSIFICATION::, CLASSIFY::, PEM::, PSC::, and the urlcatquery command), undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41217 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in an undisclosed BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) command that may allow an authenticated attacker with resource administrator or administrator role to execute arbitrary system commands with higher privileges. In Appliance mode deployments, a successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40703 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the dashboard of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40699 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in the undisclosed pages in the Configuration utility that may allow a low-privileged authenticated attacker to access to undisclosed sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40698 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Resource Administrator role can create SNMP configuration objects through iControl REST or the TMOS shell (tmsh) resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40631 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role can modify configuration objects through iControl SOAP resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |