Overview 2,025 matches · 103 in Waratek scope · 9 protected · 40 exploited · 26 CISA KEV · 135 public PoC · 54 EPSS ≥ 0.5
2,025matches
103in Waratek scope5.1%
9protected0.4%
40exploited2.0%
26CISA KEV1.3%
135public PoC6.7%
54EPSS ≥ 0.52.7%
Protected by Waratek
9
0.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
5
0.2%
No exploit published
89
4.4%
Outside Waratek scope
113
5.6%
Not applicable
1,809
89.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
9
0.4%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
2,016
99.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 189 / year
19991
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20004
Not applicable4
High4
not blocked4
Working exploit published1
No public exploit3
20012
Not applicable2
High2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20025
Not applicable5
High5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
20033
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
Working exploit published2
No public exploit1
200411
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable10
High11
not blocked11
No public exploit11
200522
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable21
High22
not blocked22
Working exploit published5
No public exploit17
200617
Not applicable17
High17
not blocked17
Working exploit published6
No public exploit11
200749
Not applicable49
High49
not blocked49
Working exploit published8
No public exploit41
200840
Not applicable40
High40
not blocked40
Working exploit published7
No public exploit33
200942
Not applicable42
High42
not blocked42
Exploited2
Working exploit published9
No public exploit31
201018
Not applicable18
High18
not blocked18
Working exploit published4
No public exploit14
201135
Not applicable35
High35
not blocked35
Working exploit published1
No public exploit34
201230
Not applicable30
High30
not blocked30
Working exploit published3
No public exploit27
201333
Not applicable33
High33
not blocked33
Working exploit published2
No public exploit31
201446
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable45
High46
not blocked46
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit39
201544
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable43
High44
not blocked44
Working exploit published7
No public exploit37
201682
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope4
Not applicable76
High82
not blocked82
Exploited3
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only1
No public exploit72
2017135
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable125
High135
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked134
Exploited2
Working exploit published19
No public exploit114
2018157
No exploit published6
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable143
High157
not blocked157
Exploited5
Working exploit published11
Forecast only1
No public exploit140
2019170
Mitigation candidate3
No exploit published8
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable146
High170
not blocked170
Exploited3
Working exploit published5
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit159
2020187
No exploit published5
Outside Waratek scope24
Not applicable158
High187
not blocked187
Exploited5
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only1
Forecast only2
No public exploit177
2021189
Protected by Waratek4
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope16
Not applicable166
High189
blocked by ARMR today4
not blocked185
Exploited7
Proof of concept only3
Forecast only2
No public exploit177
2022174
No exploit published9
Outside Waratek scope13
Not applicable152
High174
not blocked174
Exploited2
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only18
No public exploit153
2023160
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope7
Not applicable148
High160
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked158
Exploited4
Proof of concept only10
Forecast only3
No public exploit143
2024139
No exploit published8
Outside Waratek scope8
Not applicable123
High139
not blocked139
Exploited3
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only12
No public exploit123
202596
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable86
High96
not blocked96
Exploited1
Proof of concept only16
No public exploit79
2026134
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published33
Outside Waratek scope11
Not applicable88
High134
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked132
Exploited3
Proof of concept only13
No public exploit118
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-111560 | High | 2026-11-02 | Not applicable | Exploited | Improper neutralization of shell metacharacters in the timezone configuration field in certain Barracuda appliance products using common Barracuda code allows an authenticated administrator to inject OS commands that execute with root privileges when the crafted timezone value is subsequently processed. |
| CVE-2026-76418 | High | 2026-10-28 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to logic errors when secondary authentication is configured on a tunnel group. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request when connecting to the SSL remote access VPN. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-85922 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Weak authentication in Azure Key Vault allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. |
| CVE-2026-105725 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Use after free in Windows Security App allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| CVE-2026-78388 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
| CVE-2026-19498 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled recursion. |
| CVE-2026-19494 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication. |
| CVE-2026-19493 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to perform an arbitrary file write due to path traversal. |
| CVE-2026-19482 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of command arguments. |
| CVE-2026-18740 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to argument injection. |
| CVE-2026-17189 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session |
| CVE-2026-12109 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an attacker with administrative privileges and access to the local management interface to execute arbitrary code due to an unbounded write to a fixed-size stack buffer. |
| CVE-2026-11930 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 may not enforce authorization correctly for some web servers. |
| CVE-2026-11888 | High | 2026-10-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an information disclosure attack. |
| CVE-2026-100834 | High | 2026-09-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | http4k's Digest authentication module (org.http4k:http4k-security-digest) before versions 6.48.0.0, 5.42.0.0 and 4.51.0.0 defaults the nonceVerifier parameter of ServerFilters.DigestAuth and DigestAuthProvider to { true }, so every nonce is accepted regardless of its value, age, or prior use. Applications relying on this default have no replay protection on Digest authentication: an attacker who can capture a valid 'Authorization: Digest' response (for example by observing network traffic or reading logs) can replay it indefinitely against the same protected resource. |
| CVE-2026-94243 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in Apache Sling Security Bundle: the ReferrerFilter accepts weaker-than-orgin evidence. This issue affects Apache Sling Security Bundle: before 1.3.2. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.3.2, which fixes the issue. |
| CVE-2026-54148 | High | 2026-09-18 | No exploit published | No public exploit | http4k is a functional toolkit for Kotlin HTTP applications. Prior to 4.51.0.0, 5.42.0.0, and 6.50.0.0, DigestAuthProvider.verify in http4k-security-digest does not compare the uri parameter in an Authorization: Digest response with the actual request URL. An attacker who captures a valid Digest authentication response can replay it against another URL served by the same realm, bypassing the per-request-URI binding and potentially gaining unauthorized read or write access. This issue is fixed in versions 4.51.0.0, 5.42.0.0, and 6.50.0.0. |
| CVE-2026-92129 | High | 2026-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not check calls from sandboxed scripts to methods added dynamically to a class at runtime, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute code outside the sandbox. |
| CVE-2026-92128 | High | 2026-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier downloads a JAR file specified by URL twice, confirming the approval of the first download and loading the classpath entries from the second, allowing attackers able to define classpath entries to execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. |
| CVE-2026-92127 | High | 2026-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier automatically approves the classpath entries in an item configuration when a user with Overall/Administer permission copies the item, or updates that configuration through the REST API or CLI, allowing attackers able to define classpath entries to execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. |
| CVE-2026-92126 | High | 2026-09-16 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not reject @Builder annotations whose builderStrategy member names an arbitrary class, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to execute code outside the sandbox if a suitable class is present on the classpath of the component that evaluates the script. |
| CVE-2026-92125 | High | 2026-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not reject the @GroovyASTTransformationClass annotation, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to run an arbitrary AST transformation at compile time, bypassing the sandbox protection and executing arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. |
| CVE-2026-92124 | High | 2026-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier checks the operations Groovy will perform with the elements it reads from a collection that a sandboxed script casts to another type but performs the cast on the collection itself, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. |
| CVE-2026-92123 | High | 2026-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not intercept operations performed on a null receiver (method calls, property and attribute accesses, and array accesses), allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. |
| CVE-2026-92122 | High | 2026-09-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1415.v9a_f9b_3a_c253d and earlier does not check the method called through the proxy created when a sandboxed script coerces a value to an interface, if the value inherits a method of the same name as an interface method, allowing attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. |
| CVE-2026-83011 | High | 2026-09-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-82996 | High | 2026-09-15 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Platform Security for Java executes to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-47877 | High | 2026-08-27 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Spring Security Authorization Server's default consent page renders user-controlled values without HTML entity encoding. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 |
| CVE-2026-47841 | High | 2026-08-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An application using Spring Security's WebAuthn support may be vulnerable to user verification bypass when using a distributed HTTP session store. Spring Security 7.1.0 Spring Security 7.0.0 - 7.0.6 Spring Security 6.5.0 - 6.5.11 Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.18 |
| CVE-2026-41707 | High | 2026-08-25 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability in Spring Spring Security allows Spring Security's DPoPProofJwtDecoderFactory contains a cache-based replay attack vulnerability. The internal cache storing JWT ID claims has a strict size limit, allowing attackers to evict legitimate entries by flooding the server with dummy requests, then replay intercepted valid DPoP proofs. This issue affects Spring Security: 7.1.0, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, and from 6.5.0 through 6.5.11. |
| CVE-2026-76389 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Cisco Talos Intelligence for Enterprise Security Cloud versions below 1.0.3, a user that holds a role with the get_talos_enrichment capability could send a crafted request to the Talos intelligence enrichment Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoint and cause the instance to make an outbound request to an attacker-controlled server. The request could expose tokens that compromise all relevant data and system integrity in the Splunk instance. The vulnerability is possible because the Talos intelligence enrichment REST endpoint accepts the destination for authenticated Splunk management requests from request data. For more information see Deploy Cisco Talos Intelligence for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.0/introduction/deploy-cisco-talos-intelligence-for-splunk-enterprise-security-cloud-only) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-76388 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise Security versions below 8.6.1, a user who holds the ess_analyst Splunk Enterprise Security role could change User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) search macros that scheduled searches run with administrator permissions, allowing for access to all relevant data and system integrity through those searches. The vulnerability is possible because the UEBA app metadata grants analyst roles write access to search macros that should be writable only by administrator roles. For more information see Users and roles for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/install/8.4/installation/users-and-roles-for-splunk-enterprise-security) and Roles and knowledge objects in UEBA for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/administer/8.5/user-and-entity-behavior-analytics/roles-and-knowledge-objects-in-ueba-for-splunk-enterprise-security) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-76387 | High | 2026-08-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Splunk Enterprise Security versions below 8.6.1, a user who holds a Splunk Enterprise Security role that contains the mc_investigation_read capability could inject Search Processing Language (SPL) through Analyst Queue search filters, allowing for access to all relevant data and system integrity available to the scheduled searches that run for that user. The vulnerability is possible because the Analyst Queue search filter handling does not validate filter field names before the fields are included in SPL searches. For more information see Users and roles for Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/install/8.4/installation/users-and-roles-for-splunk-enterprise-security), Manage analyst workflows using the analyst queue in Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/administer/8.4/mission-control/manage-analyst-workflows-using-the-analyst-queue-in-splunk-enterprise-security), and Overview of Mission Control in Splunk Enterprise Security (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise-security-8/user-guide/8.5/mission-control/overview-of-mission-control-in-splunk-enterprise-security) in the Splunk documentation. |
| CVE-2026-19680 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A SQL injection vulnerability exists in Security Center that could allow an attacker to access unauthorized data from the application's database. |
| CVE-2026-19679 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An input validation vulnerability exists in Security Center's file upload handling, where insufficient sanitization of uploaded filenames could contribute to a downstream command injection issue. |
| CVE-2026-19635 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Security Center. An attacker with write access to a specific configuration file could achieve arbitrary code execution with elevated privileges, without requiring further user or victim interaction. |
| CVE-2026-19629 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center that allows a user with "Security Manager" role and "manage user" permission on a single group to modify users belonging to other groups. This bypasses the intended access control restrictions and enables unauthorized cross-group user management. |
| CVE-2026-19628 | High | 2026-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A command injection vulnerability exists in Tenable Security Center. An authenticated administrator could modify application configuration values to achieve arbitrary command execution on the underlying operating system when specific backend operations are triggered. |
| CVE-2026-13267 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an authenticated user to gain privileges of another user via a specially crafted request. |
| CVE-2026-12618 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow an administrator to execute additional commands they are not entitled to due to improper validation of user supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-12359 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information due to an inconsistent interpretation of an HTTP request by a reverse proxy. |
| CVE-2026-12005 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 contains a input validation vulnerability in the management interface that allows already privileged attackers to execute additional operations by crafting a malicious HTTP request. |
| CVE-2026-12004 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 contains a format string injection vulnerability in the management interface that allows attackers to cause denial of service and information disclosure by crafting a malicious HTTP request. |
| CVE-2026-11932 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack. |
| CVE-2026-11923 | High | 2026-08-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.2 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.3 and IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.3 Reverse Proxy in certain configurations may provide weaker than expected cryptographic validation of user supplied data. |
| CVE-2026-20349 | High | 2026-08-11 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | A vulnerability in the Remote Access SSL VPN service for Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to insufficient error checking when processing HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the Remote Access SSL VPN service on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. |
| CVE-2026-13477 | High | 2026-08-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar 7.6.0.0 through 7.6.0.1, and 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 UP 15 Interim Fix 005 could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary commands with normal user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input. |
| CVE-2026-10050 | High | 2026-08-04 | No exploit published | Proof of concept only | In Eclipse Jetty, the Digest authentication server-side component uses ISO-8859-1 to encode the password as bytes. This was done because the initial specification for HTTP did not specify explicitly a charset, and it was assumed to be ISO-8859-1 for historical reasons. If the password contains characters that cannot be represented in ISO-8859-1, they are silently replaced by `?`. This happens with passwords that contain Chinese, Cyrillic or Greek characters, for example: `αβ123` converts to `??123`. An attacker can send a request with a digest `Authorization` header crafted with a password made of only `?` characters; the server would match any password of the same length that contains non-ISO-8859-1 characters. Recent HTTP Digest [RFC-7616](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7616) supports a `charset` parameters that defaults to UTF-8 that allows for correct encoding/decoding of passwords. |
| CVE-2026-61246 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60455 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60439 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60373 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60371 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with access to the physical communication segment attached to the hardware where the Oracle Platform Security for Java executes to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Platform Security for Java, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60370 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-60368 | High | 2026-07-22 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the Oracle Platform Security for Java product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Centralized Thirdparty Jars). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via SOAP to compromise Oracle Platform Security for Java. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Platform Security for Java. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). |
| CVE-2026-64881 | High | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The audit file upload handler does not sanitize filenames, allowing shell metacharacters to flow into system command execution. This input validation failure enables command injection when chained with a related vulnerability. |
| CVE-2026-64880 | High | 2026-07-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Unsanitized user-supplied input in report filtering parameters is concatenated directly into SQL queries without proper escaping or parameterized queries, enabling blind SQL injection and unauthorized database read access. |
| CVE-2026-6851 | High | 2026-07-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') vulnerability in the File Shredder module as used in Bitdefender Total Security and Internet Security on Windows allows a less-privileged local user to elevate rights by leveraging a race conditions via Symbolic Links. This issue affects Total Security: before 27.0.58.315; Internet Security: before 27.0.58.315. |
| CVE-2026-52747 | High | 2026-07-10 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | ModSecurity is an open source, cross platform web application firewall (WAF) engine for Apache, IIS and Nginx. Prior to 3.0.16, the multipart/form-data request body parser in libmodsecurity silently removes embedded line breaks from non-file form-field values before exporting them to ARGS and ARGS_POST because src/request_body_processor/multipart.cc overwrites reserved bytes in m_reserve instead of appending the current buffer. This creates a parser differential between ModSecurity and backend applications that preserve line breaks in form fields, allowing rules that inspect ARGS or ARGS_POST to miss payloads whose dangerous syntax depends on a line break. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.16. |
| CVE-2026-57281 | High | 2026-06-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1402.v94c9ce464861 and earlier does not reject Groovy AST transformation annotations carrying an extensions member, allowing attackers able to run sandboxed Groovy scripts to execute code outside the sandbox if a suitable script is present on the classpath of the component that evaluates the script. |
| CVE-2026-57280 | High | 2026-06-24 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1402.v94c9ce464861 and earlier does not intercept the implicit type casts applied to the elements of typed for-each loops in sandboxed Groovy scripts, allowing attackers able to provide such scripts to invoke arbitrary constructors and bypass the sandbox protection. |
| CVE-2026-50631 | High | 2026-06-12 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A race condition in AbstractOAuthDataProvider allows concurrent requests using the same Refresh Token to bypass single-use semantics and generate multiple valid Access Tokens, when 'recycleRefreshTokens' is set to false. A leaked refresh token can be replayed concurrently by multiple attackers or threads. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.2 or 4.1.7 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue. |
| CVE-2026-44495 | High | 2026-06-11 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | Axios is a promise based HTTP client for the browser and Node.js. From 0.19.0 to before 0.31.1 and 1.15.2, Axios contains prototype-pollution gadgets in request config processing. If another vulnerability in the same JavaScript process has already polluted Object.prototype.transformResponse, affected Axios versions may treat that inherited value as request configuration or as an option validator. Axios does not itself create the prototype pollution. Exploitability requires a separate prototype-pollution vulnerability or equivalent attacker control over Object.prototype before Axios creates a request. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.31.1 and 1.15.2. |
| CVE-2026-40994 | High | 2026-06-11 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Wss4jSecurityInterceptor initialized its BSP (WS-I Basic Security Profile) compliance flag so that inbound validation disabled WSS4J BSP enforcement on RequestData. Services that validate WS-Security on the network could therefore accept messages that violate BSP rules, weakening protocol-level checks. Affected versions: Spring Web Services 5.0.0 through 5.0.1; 4.1.0 through 4.1.3; 4.0.0 through 4.0.18; 3.1.0 through 3.1.8. |
| CVE-2026-47838 | High | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | SubjectDnX509PrincipalExtractor does not correctly handle certain malformed X.509 certificate CN values, which can lead to reading the wrong value for the username. In a carefully crafted certificate, this can lead to an attacker impersonating another user. Affected versions: Spring Security 5.7.0 through 5.7.24; 5.8.0 through 5.8.26; 6.3.0 through 6.3.17; 6.4.0 through 6.4.17; 6.5.0 through 6.5.10. |
| CVE-2026-41003 | High | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An attacker able to influence values in RelyingPartyRegistration may be able to run arbitrary code on HTML forms generated by Spring Security filters. Affected versions: Spring Security 5.7.0 through 5.7.23; 5.8.0 through 5.8.25; 6.3.0 through 6.3.16; 6.4.0 through 6.4.16; 6.5.0 through 6.5.10; 7.0.0 through 7.0.5. |
| CVE-2026-40993 | High | 2026-06-10 | Protected by Waratek | No public exploit | An attacker with write permissions to the database table managed by JdbcAssertingPartyMetadataRepository (saml2_asserting_party_metadata) may be able to store malicious serialized payloads in the columns containing the collection of verification or encryption credentials (verification_credentials and encryption_credentials, respectively). Affected versions: Spring Security 7.0.0 through 7.0.5. |
| CVE-2026-40988 | High | 2026-06-10 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An application using spring-security-saml2-service-provider and the REDIRECT binding for SAML 2.0 Login or Logout may be vulnerable to a denial of service by way of an unbounded writer that inflates the compressed SAML payload into memory. Affected versions: Spring Security 5.7.0 through 5.7.23; 5.8.0 through 5.8.25; 6.3.0 through 6.3.16; 6.4.0 through 6.4.16; 6.5.0 through 6.5.10; 7.0.0 through 7.0.5. |
| CVE-2026-0274 | High | 2026-06-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper validation of credentials vulnerability in the CommvaultSecurityIQ integration for Cortex XSOAR and Cortex XSIAM allows an unauthenticated attacker to access and modify protected resources. |
| CVE-2026-45609 | High | 2026-05-29 | No exploit published | No public exploit | mcp-security provides Security and Authorization support for Model Context Protocol in Spring AI. Prior to 0.1.9, the mcp-security framework fails to implement the mandatory SSRF mitigations outlined in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) security specifications. Specifically, it processes untrusted URLs for OAuth-related discovery and metadata without verifying if the targets are malicious or internal to the network. This only affects installations with Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) enabled This vulnerability is fixed in 0.1.9. |
| CVE-2024-56462 | High | 2026-05-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM QRadar 7.5.0 through 7.5.0 UP15 Interim Fix 002 could allow a privileged user to upload a malicious backup archive that could be restored and used to gain access to the underlying operating system. |
| CVE-2026-42937 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect permission assignment vulnerabilities exist in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ TMOS Shell (tmsh) arp and ndp commands, and in BIG-IP iControl REST. These vulnerabilities may allow an authenticated attacker to view adjacent network information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42930 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker assigned the 'Administrator' role may be able to bypass Appliance mode restrictions on a BIG-IP system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42924 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role can create SNMP configuration objects through iControl SOAP resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42920 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a Client SSL profile is configured with Allow Dynamic Record Sizing on a UDP virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42919 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP systems that may allow an authenticated attacker with administrative access to escalate their privileges. A successful exploit may allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42781 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When embedded Packet Velocity Acceleration (ePVA) acceleration is configured, undisclosed local ethernet traffic can cause an increase in ePVA and Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42409 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When an HTTP/2 profile and an iRule containing the HTTP::redirect or HTTP::respond command are configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42406 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Certificate Manager role can modify configuration objects that allow running arbitrary commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41959 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect permission assignment vulnerabilities exist in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ TMOS Shell (tmsh) network diagnostics commands and in BIG-IP iControl REST. These vulnerabilities may allow an authenticated attacker to view the network status of destination systems. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41957 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated remote code execution vulnerability through undisclosed vectors exists in the BIG-IP and BIG-IQ Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41956 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a classification profile is configured on a UDP virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41953 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Resource Administrator role can modify configuration objects resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41227 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On an HTTP/2 virtual server with Layer 7 DoS Protection configured, undisclosed traffic can result in an increase in memory consumption causing the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41225 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in iControl REST where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Manager role can create configuration objects that allow running arbitrary commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41219 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An improper sanitization vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP QKView utility that allows a low-privileged attacker to read sensitive information from a QKView file. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2026-41218 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When BIG-IP PEM iRules are configured on a virtual server (iRules using commands starting with CLASSIFICATION::, CLASSIFY::, PEM::, PSC::, and the urlcatquery command), undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41217 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in an undisclosed BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) command that may allow an authenticated attacker with resource administrator or administrator role to execute arbitrary system commands with higher privileges. In Appliance mode deployments, a successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40699 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in the undisclosed pages in the Configuration utility that may allow a low-privileged authenticated attacker to access to undisclosed sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40698 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Resource Administrator role can create SNMP configuration objects through iControl REST or the TMOS shell (tmsh) resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40631 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role can modify configuration objects through iControl SOAP resulting in privilege escalation. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40629 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When SSL profiles are configured on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the virtual server to stop processing new client connections. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40618 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When an SSL profile is configured on a virtual server on BIG-IP Virtual Edition (VE) without Intel QuickAssist Technology (QAT) or on BIG-IP hardware platforms with the database variable crypto.hwacceleration set to disabled, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40462 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect permission assignment vulnerabilities exist in iControl REST and TMOS shell (tmsh) undisclosed command which may allow an authenticated attacker to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40423 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a SIP profile is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40060 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or ASM security policy is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the bd process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-39459 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in iControl REST and the TMOS Shell (tmsh) where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Manager role can create configuration objects that allow running arbitrary commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-39458 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When a BIG-IP is configured with DNS caching (Such as a DNS profile with caching enabled, SSL Orchestrator, Advanced WAF DoS protection), undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-39455 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When the BIG-IP Configuration utility is configured to use Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) authentication, undisclosed traffic can cause the httpd process to exhaust the available file descriptors. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-35062 | High | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated iControl SOAP user may be able to obtain information of other accounts. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |