Overview 39 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 4 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
39matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
4public PoC10.3%
1EPSS ≥ 0.52.6%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
2.6%
Not applicable
38
97.4%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
39
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
4
10.3%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
35
89.7%
split by
peak 9 / year
20003
Not applicable3
High3
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20010
20025
Not applicable5
High3
Medium2
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20031
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20043
Not applicable3
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20053
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
High2
Medium1
not blocked3
Working exploit published1
No public exploit2
20065
Not applicable5
High4
Medium1
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
20071
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20081
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20090
20100
20110
20123
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20132
Not applicable2
High1
Medium1
not blocked2
No public exploit2
20140
20159
Not applicable9
Medium9
not blocked9
No public exploit9
20160
20170
20183
Not applicable3
Medium1
Low2
not blocked3
No public exploit3
2000200220042006200820102012201420162018
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-0414 | Medium | 2018-10-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based UI of Cisco Secure Access Control Server could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to gain read access to certain information in an affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External Entities (XXEs) when parsing an XML file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing the administrator of an affected system to import a crafted XML file. |
| CVE-2018-0218 | Low | 2018-03-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based user interface of the Cisco Secure Access Control Server prior to 5.8 patch 9 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain read access to certain information in the affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External Entities (XXEs) when parsing an XML file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing the administrator of an affected system to import a crafted XML file. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCve70616. |
| CVE-2018-0207 | Low | 2018-03-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based user interface of the Cisco Secure Access Control Server prior to 5.8 patch 9 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain read access to certain information in the affected system. The vulnerability is due to improper handling of XML External Entities (XXEs) when parsing an XML file. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by convincing the administrator of an affected system to import a crafted XML file. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCve70595. |
| CVE-2015-6349 | Medium | 2015-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web interface in the Solution Engine in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 5.7(0.15) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| CVE-2015-6348 | Medium | 2015-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The report-generation web interface in the Solution Engine in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 5.7(0.15) allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended RBAC restrictions, and read report or status information, by visiting an unspecified web page. |
| CVE-2015-6347 | Medium | 2015-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Solution Engine in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 5.7(0.15) allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended RBAC restrictions, and create a dashboard or portlet, by visiting an unspecified web page. |
| CVE-2015-6346 | Medium | 2015-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 5.7(0.15) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. |
| CVE-2015-6345 | Medium | 2015-10-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | SQL injection vulnerability in the Solution Engine in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 5.7(0.15) allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a crafted URL, aka Bug ID CSCuw24700. |
| CVE-2015-6300 | Medium | 2015-09-20 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) Solution Engine 5.7(0.15) allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (SSH screen process crash) via crafted (1) CLI or (2) GUI commands, aka Bug ID CSCuw24694. |
| CVE-2015-0746 | Medium | 2015-05-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The REST API in Cisco Access Control Server (ACS) 5.5(0.46.2) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (API outage) by sending many requests, aka Bug ID CSCut62022. |
| CVE-2015-0729 | Medium | 2015-05-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine (ACSE) 5.5(0.1) allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a file-inclusion attack, aka Bug ID CSCuu11005. |
| CVE-2015-0700 | Medium | 2015-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Dashboard page in the monitoring-and-report section in Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine before 5.5(0.46.5) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users, aka Bug ID CSCuj62924. |
| CVE-2013-3466 | High | 2013-08-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The EAP-FAST authentication module in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 4.x before 4.2.1.15.11, when a RADIUS server configuration is enabled, does not properly parse user identities, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted EAP-FAST packets, aka Bug ID CSCui57636. |
| CVE-2013-3380 | Medium | 2013-06-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The administrative web interface in the Access Control Server in Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) does not properly restrict the report view page, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a direct request, aka Bug ID CSCue79279. |
| CVE-2012-5424 | Medium | 2012-11-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) 5.x before 5.2 Patch 11 and 5.3 before 5.3 Patch 7, when a certain configuration involving TACACS+ and LDAP is used, does not properly validate passwords, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a valid username and a crafted password string, aka Bug ID CSCuc65634. |
| CVE-2011-3317 | Medium | 2012-05-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Solution Engine in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 5.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors, aka Bug ID CSCtr78192. |
| CVE-2011-3293 | Medium | 2012-05-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Solution Engine in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 5.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences, aka Bug ID CSCtr78143. |
| CVE-2008-2441 | High | 2008-09-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Secure ACS 3.x before 3.3(4) Build 12 patch 7, 4.0.x, 4.1.x before 4.1(4) Build 13 Patch 11, and 4.2.x before 4.2(0) Build 124 Patch 4 does not properly handle an EAP Response packet in which the value of the length field exceeds the actual packet length, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CSRadius and CSAuth service crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted RADIUS (1) EAP-Response/Identity, (2) EAP-Response/MD5, or (3) EAP-Response/TLS Message Attribute packet. |
| CVE-2007-0105 | High | 2007-01-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based buffer overflow in the CSAdmin service in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows before 4.1 and ACS Solution Engine before 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP GET request. |
| CVE-2006-4098 | High | 2006-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Stack-based buffer overflow in the CSRadius service in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows before 4.1 and ACS Solution Engine before 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted RADIUS Accounting-Request packet. |
| CVE-2006-4097 | High | 2006-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the CSRadius service in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows before 4.1 and ACS Solution Engine before 4.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted RADIUS Access-Request packet. NOTE: it has been reported that at least one issue is a heap-based buffer overflow involving the Tunnel-Password attribute. |
| CVE-2006-3226 | High | 2006-06-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 4.x for Windows uses the client's IP address and the server's port number to grant access to an HTTP server port for an administration session, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via various methods, aka "ACS Weak Session Management Vulnerability." |
| CVE-2006-3101 | Medium | 2006-06-21 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LogonProxy.cgi in Cisco Secure ACS for UNIX 2.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) error, (2) SSL, and (3) Ok parameters. |
| CVE-2006-0561 | High | 2006-05-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 3.x for Windows stores ACS administrator passwords and the master key in the registry with insecure permissions, which allows local users and remote administrators to decrypt the passwords by using Microsoft's cryptographic API functions to obtain the plaintext version of the master key. |
| CVE-2005-4499 | High | 2005-12-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Downloadable RADIUS ACLs feature in Cisco PIX and VPN 3000 concentrators, when creating an ACL on the Cisco Secure Access Control Server (CS ACS), generates a random internal name for an ACL that is also used as a hidden user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by sniffing the username from the cleartext portion of a RADIUS session, then using the password to log in to another device that uses CS ACS. |
| CVE-2005-0356 | Medium | 2005-05-31 | Outside Waratek scope | Working exploit published | Multiple TCP implementations with Protection Against Wrapped Sequence Numbers (PAWS) with the timestamps option enabled allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection loss) via a spoofed packet with a large timer value, which causes the host to discard later packets because they appear to be too old. |
| CVE-2004-1099 | High | 2005-01-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Secure Access Control Server for Windows (ACS Windows) and Cisco Secure Access Control Server Solution Engine (ACS Solution Engine) 3.3.1, when the EAP-TLS protocol is enabled, does not properly handle expired or untrusted certificates, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access via a "cryptographically correct" certificate with valid fields such as the username. |
| CVE-2004-1461 | High | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 3.2(3) and earlier spawns a separate unauthenticated TCP connection on a random port when a user authenticates to the ACS GUI, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by connecting to that port from the same IP address. |
| CVE-2004-1460 | High | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 3.2(3) and earlier, when configured with an anonymous bind in Novell Directory Services (NDS) and authenticating NDS users with NDS, allows remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to AAA clients via a blank password. |
| CVE-2004-1458 | Medium | 2004-12-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The CSAdmin web administration interface for Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 3.2(2) build 15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (hang) via a flood of TCP connections to port 2002. |
| CVE-2003-0210 | High | 2003-05-12 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow in the administration service (CSAdmin) for Cisco Secure ACS before 3.1.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long user parameter to port 2002. |
| CVE-2002-1095 | Medium | 2002-10-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator before 2.5.2(F), with encryption enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reload) via a Windows-based PPTP client with the "No Encryption" option set. |
| CVE-2002-0938 | High | 2002-10-04 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Cross-site scripting vulnerability in CiscoSecure ACS 3.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary script or HTML as other web users via the action argument in a link to setup.exe. |
| CVE-2002-0241 | High | 2002-05-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | NDSAuth.DLL in Cisco Secure Authentication Control Server (ACS) 3.0.1 does not check the Expired or Disabled state of users in the Novell Directory Services (NDS), which could allow those users to authenticate to the server. |
| CVE-2002-0160 | Medium | 2002-04-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The administration function in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows, 2.6.x and earlier and 3.x through 3.01 (build 40), allows remote attackers to read HTML, Java class, and image files outside the web root via a ..\.. (modified ..) in the URL to port 2002. |
| CVE-2002-0159 | High | 2002-04-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Format string vulnerability in the administration function in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows, 2.6.x and earlier and 3.x through 3.01 (build 40), allows remote attackers to crash the CSADMIN module only (denial of service of administration function) or execute arbitrary code via format strings in the URL to port 2002. |
| CVE-2000-1056 | High | 2000-12-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | CiscoSecure ACS Server 2.4(2) and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass LDAP authentication on the server if the LDAP server allows null passwords. |
| CVE-2000-1055 | High | 2000-12-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow in CiscoSecure ACS Server 2.4(2) and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary commands via a large TACACS+ packet. |
| CVE-2000-1054 | High | 2000-12-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Buffer overflow in CSAdmin module in CiscoSecure ACS Server 2.4(2) and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary commands via a large packet. |