WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (1)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Product retail predictive application server✕
Overview 17 matches · 13 in Waratek scope · 5 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 2 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
17matches 13in Waratek scope76.5% 5protected29.4% 1exploited5.9% 0CISA KEV0.0% 2public PoC11.8% 1EPSS ≥ 0.55.9%
Protected by Waratek 5 29.4% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 0 0.0% No exploit published 8 47.1% Outside Waratek scope 2 11.8% Not applicable 2 11.8% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 0 0.0% High 0 0.0% Medium 17 100.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 5 29.4% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 12 70.6% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 1 5.9% Working exploit published 1 5.9% Proof of concept only 0 0.0% Forecast only 0 0.0% No public exploit 15 88.2%
split by peak 3 / quarter
Not applicable: 2Outside Waratek scope: 2No exploit published: 8Protected by Waratek: 5 Medium: 17 not blocked: 12blocked by ARMR today: 5 No public exploit: 15Working exploit published: 1Exploited: 1
Q2 183 Protected by Waratek1 No exploit published2 Medium3 blocked by ARMR today1 not blocked2 Working exploit published1 No public exploit2 Q3 183 No exploit published1 Not applicable2 Medium3 not blocked3 No public exploit3 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 190 Q3 193 No exploit published2 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium3 not blocked3 No public exploit3 Q4 192 Protected by Waratek2 Medium2 blocked by ARMR today2 No public exploit2 Q1 201 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 No public exploit1 Q2 201 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q3 201 No exploit published1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q4 200 Q1 210 Q2 210 Q3 212 No exploit published2 Medium2 not blocked2 No public exploit2 Q4 211 Protected by Waratek1 Medium1 blocked by ARMR today1 Exploited1
Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21
17 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2021-45105 Medium 2021-12-18 Protected by Waratek Exploited Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1.
CVE-2021-36374 Medium 2021-07-14 No exploit published No public exploit When reading a specially crafted ZIP archive, or a derived formats, an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Commonly used derived formats from ZIP archives are for instance JAR files and many office files. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected.
CVE-2021-36373 Medium 2021-07-14 No exploit published No public exploit When reading a specially crafted TAR archive an Apache Ant build can be made to allocate large amounts of memory that finally leads to an out of memory error, even for small inputs. This can be used to disrupt builds using Apache Ant. Apache Ant prior to 1.9.16 and 1.10.11 were affected.
CVE-2020-5421 Medium 2020-09-19 No exploit published No public exploit In Spring Framework versions 5.2.0 - 5.2.8, 5.1.0 - 5.1.17, 5.0.0 - 5.0.18, 4.3.0 - 4.3.28, and older unsupported versions, the protections against RFD attacks from CVE-2015-5211 may be bypassed depending on the browser used through the use of a jsessionid path parameter.
CVE-2020-1945 Medium 2020-05-14 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit Apache Ant 1.1 to 1.9.14 and 1.10.0 to 1.10.7 uses the default temporary directory identified by the Java system property java.io.tmpdir for several tasks and may thus leak sensitive information. The fixcrlf and replaceregexp tasks also copy files from the temporary directory back into the build tree allowing an attacker to inject modified source files into the build process.
CVE-2020-5397 Medium 2020-01-17 Protected by Waratek No public exploit Spring Framework, versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.3 are vulnerable to CSRF attacks through CORS preflight requests that target Spring MVC (spring-webmvc module) or Spring WebFlux (spring-webflux module) endpoints. Only non-authenticated endpoints are vulnerable because preflight requests should not include credentials and therefore requests should fail authentication. However a notable exception to this are Chrome based browsers when using client certificates for authentication since Chrome sends TLS client certificates in CORS preflight requests in violation of spec requirements. No HTTP body can be sent or received as a result of this attack.
CVE-2019-10219 Medium 2019-11-08 Protected by Waratek No public exploit A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack.
CVE-2019-12415 Medium 2019-10-23 Protected by Waratek No public exploit In Apache POI up to 4.1.0, when using the tool XSSFExportToXml to convert user-provided Microsoft Excel documents, a specially crafted document can allow an attacker to read files from the local filesystem or from internal network resources via XML External Entity (XXE) Processing.
CVE-2019-3740 Medium 2019-09-18 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys.
CVE-2019-3739 Medium 2019-09-18 No exploit published No public exploit RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys.
CVE-2019-3738 Medium 2019-09-18 No exploit published No public exploit RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to a Missing Required Cryptographic Step vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key.
CVE-2018-11057 Medium 2018-08-31 Not applicable No public exploit RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 4.0.11 (in 4.0.x) and prior to 4.1.6.1 (in 4.1.x) contains a Covert Timing Channel vulnerability during RSA decryption, also known as a Bleichenbacher attack on RSA decryption. A remote attacker may be able to recover a RSA key.
CVE-2018-11056 Medium 2018-08-31 No exploit published No public exploit RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, prior to 4.1.6.1 (in 4.1.x), and RSA BSAFE Crypto-C Micro Edition versions prior to 4.0.5.3 (in 4.0.x) contain an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption ('Resource Exhaustion') vulnerability when parsing ASN.1 data. A remote attacker could use maliciously constructed ASN.1 data that would exhaust the stack, potentially causing a Denial Of Service.
CVE-2018-11055 Medium 2018-08-31 Not applicable No public exploit RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 4.0.11 (in 4.0.x) and prior to 4.1.6.1 (in 4.1.x), contains an Improper Clearing of Heap Memory Before Release ('Heap Inspection') vulnerability. Decoded PKCS #12 data in heap memory is not zeroized by MES before releasing the memory internally and a malicious local user could gain access to the unauthorized data by doing heap inspection.
CVE-2018-11039 Medium 2018-06-25 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Framework (versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.7, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.18, and older unsupported versions) allow web applications to change the HTTP request method to any HTTP method (including TRACE) using the HiddenHttpMethodFilter in Spring MVC. If an application has a pre-existing XSS vulnerability, a malicious user (or attacker) can use this filter to escalate to an XST (Cross Site Tracing) attack.
CVE-2018-1257 Medium 2018-05-11 No exploit published No public exploit Spring Framework, versions 5.0.x prior to 5.0.6, versions 4.3.x prior to 4.3.17, and older unsupported versions allows applications to expose STOMP over WebSocket endpoints with a simple, in-memory STOMP broker through the spring-messaging module. A malicious user (or attacker) can craft a message to the broker that can lead to a regular expression, denial of service attack.
CVE-2018-1271 Medium 2018-04-06 Protected by Waratek Working exploit published Spring Framework, versions 5.0 prior to 5.0.5 and versions 4.3 prior to 4.3.15 and older unsupported versions, allow applications to configure Spring MVC to serve static resources (e.g. CSS, JS, images). When static resources are served from a file system on Windows (as opposed to the classpath, or the ServletContext), a malicious user can send a request using a specially crafted URL that can lead a directory traversal attack.