Overview 17 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 7 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
17matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
1exploited5.9%
0CISA KEV0.0%
7public PoC41.2%
1EPSS ≥ 0.55.9%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
5.9%
Not applicable
16
94.1%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
17
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
5.9%
Working exploit published
6
35.3%
Proof of concept only
0
0.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
10
58.8%
split by
peak 2 / year
19991
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20000
20012
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published2
20020
20030
20041
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20051
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20061
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
Working exploit published1
20071
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20081
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20092
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20101
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20112
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20120
20131
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20140
20150
20160
20171
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20180
20191
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20200
20210
20220
20231
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Exploited1
1999200120032005200720092011201320152017201920212023
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-48795 | Medium | 2023-12-18 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. |
| CVE-2019-19269 | Medium | 2019-11-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An issue was discovered in tls_verify_crl in ProFTPD through 1.3.6b. A dereference of a NULL pointer may occur. This pointer is returned by the OpenSSL sk_X509_REVOKED_value() function when encountering an empty CRL installed by a system administrator. The dereference occurs when validating the certificate of a client connecting to the server in a TLS client/server mutual-authentication setup. |
| CVE-2017-7418 | Medium | 2017-04-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD before 1.3.5e and 1.3.6 before 1.3.6rc5 controls whether the home directory of a user could contain a symbolic link through the AllowChrootSymlinks configuration option, but checks only the last path component when enforcing AllowChrootSymlinks. Attackers with local access could bypass the AllowChrootSymlinks control by replacing a path component (other than the last one) with a symbolic link. The threat model includes an attacker who is not granted full filesystem access by a hosting provider, but can reconfigure the home directory of an FTP user. |
| CVE-2013-4359 | Medium | 2013-09-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Integer overflow in kbdint.c in mod_sftp in ProFTPD 1.3.4d and 1.3.5r3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a large response count value in an authentication request, which triggers a large memory allocation. |
| CVE-2011-1137 | Medium | 2011-03-11 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Integer overflow in the mod_sftp (aka SFTP) module in ProFTPD 1.3.3d and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption leading to OOM kill) via a malformed SSH message. |
| CVE-2010-4652 | Medium | 2011-02-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based buffer overflow in the sql_prepare_where function (contrib/mod_sql.c) in ProFTPD before 1.3.3d, when mod_sql is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted username containing substitution tags, which are not properly handled during construction of an SQL query. |
| CVE-2008-7265 | Medium | 2010-11-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The pr_data_xfer function in ProFTPD before 1.3.2rc3 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via an ABOR command during a data transfer. |
| CVE-2009-3639 | Medium | 2009-10-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The mod_tls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.2b, and 1.3.3 before 1.3.3rc2, when the dNSNameRequired TLS option is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 client certificate, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended client-hostname restrictions via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. |
| CVE-2009-0543 | Medium | 2009-02-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | ProFTPD Server 1.3.1, with NLS support enabled, allows remote attackers to bypass SQL injection protection mechanisms via invalid, encoded multibyte characters, which are not properly handled in (1) mod_sql_mysql and (2) mod_sql_postgres. |
| CVE-2008-4242 | Medium | 2008-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPD 1.3.1 interprets long commands from an FTP client as multiple commands, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks and execute arbitrary FTP commands via a long ftp:// URI that leverages an existing session from the FTP client implementation in a web browser. |
| CVE-2007-2165 | Medium | 2007-04-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Auth API in ProFTPD before 20070417, when multiple simultaneous authentication modules are configured, does not require that the module that checks authentication is the same as the module that retrieves authentication data, which might allow remote attackers to bypass authentication, as demonstrated by use of SQLAuthTypes Plaintext in mod_sql, with data retrieved from /etc/passwd. |
| CVE-2006-6563 | Medium | 2006-12-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Stack-based buffer overflow in the pr_ctrls_recv_request function in ctrls.c in the mod_ctrls module in ProFTPD before 1.3.1rc1 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a large reqarglen length value. |
| CVE-2005-2390 | Medium | 2005-07-27 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Multiple format string vulnerabilities in ProFTPD before 1.3.0rc2 allow attackers to cause a denial of service or obtain sensitive information via (1) certain inputs to the shutdown message from ftpshut, or (2) the SQLShowInfo mod_sql directive. |
| CVE-2004-1602 | Medium | 2004-10-15 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | ProFTPD 1.2.x, including 1.2.8 and 1.2.10, responds in a different amount of time when a given username exists, which allows remote attackers to identify valid usernames by timing the server response. |
| CVE-2001-1501 | Medium | 2001-12-31 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | The glob functionality in ProFTPD 1.2.1, and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) via commands with large numbers of wildcard and other special characters, as demonstrated using an ls command with multiple (1) "*/..", (2) "*/.*", or (3) ".*./*?/" sequences in the argument. |
| CVE-2001-0136 | Medium | 2001-03-12 | Not applicable | Working exploit published | Memory leak in ProFTPd 1.2.0rc2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a series of USER commands, and possibly SIZE commands if the server has been improperly installed. |
| CVE-1999-1475 | Medium | 1999-11-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ProFTPd 1.2 compiled with the mod_sqlpw module records user passwords in the wtmp log file, which allows local users to obtain the passwords and gain privileges by reading wtmp, e.g. via the last command. |