Overview 493 matches · 58 in Waratek scope · 17 protected · 4 exploited · 2 CISA KEV · 23 public PoC · 4 EPSS ≥ 0.5
493matches
58in Waratek scope11.8%
17protected3.4%
4exploited0.8%
2CISA KEV0.4%
23public PoC4.7%
4EPSS ≥ 0.50.8%
Protected by Waratek
17
3.4%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
4
0.8%
No exploit published
37
7.5%
Outside Waratek scope
14
2.8%
Not applicable
421
85.4%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
17
3.4%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
476
96.6%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 68 / year
20021
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
20031
Protected by Waratek1
Medium1
blocked by ARMR today1
No public exploit1
20042
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20052
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20062
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20073
Not applicable3
Medium3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
20084
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable3
Medium4
not blocked4
Working exploit published2
No public exploit2
20095
Not applicable5
Medium5
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
201011
Not applicable11
Medium11
not blocked11
No public exploit11
20112
Not applicable2
Medium2
not blocked2
Working exploit published1
No public exploit1
20127
No exploit published1
Not applicable6
Medium7
not blocked7
Working exploit published3
No public exploit4
20137
Protected by Waratek2
Mitigation candidate1
Not applicable4
Medium7
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked5
Working exploit published3
No public exploit4
20147
Protected by Waratek1
Not applicable6
Medium7
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked6
Exploited1
No public exploit6
201511
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published3
Not applicable7
Medium11
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked10
Working exploit published2
No public exploit9
20168
Not applicable8
Medium8
not blocked8
No public exploit8
201721
No exploit published1
Not applicable20
Medium21
not blocked21
No public exploit21
201845
Protected by Waratek1
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published4
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable38
Medium45
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked44
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit41
201957
Protected by Waratek5
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable47
Medium57
blocked by ARMR today5
not blocked52
Exploited1
No public exploit56
202044
Protected by Waratek3
Mitigation candidate1
No exploit published2
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable35
Medium44
blocked by ARMR today3
not blocked41
Exploited1
Working exploit published1
No public exploit42
202152
Protected by Waratek1
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable41
Medium52
blocked by ARMR today1
not blocked51
Working exploit published1
Forecast only1
No public exploit50
202268
Protected by Waratek2
No exploit published7
Outside Waratek scope2
Not applicable57
Medium68
blocked by ARMR today2
not blocked66
Working exploit published1
Proof of concept only5
No public exploit62
202339
No exploit published3
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable35
Medium39
not blocked39
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit37
202426
No exploit published1
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable24
Medium26
not blocked26
Proof of concept only2
No public exploit24
202529
No exploit published2
Not applicable27
Medium29
not blocked29
Proof of concept only6
No public exploit23
202639
No exploit published4
Not applicable35
Medium39
not blocked39
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit38
2002200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-116663 | Medium | 2026-11-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Enforce. |
| CVE-2026-91285 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: E1 IOT Orchestrator Security). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-91277 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: E1 IOT Orchestrator Security). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-91276 | Medium | 2026-10-20 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: E1 IOT Orchestrator Security). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.5. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2026-76707 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to view some system memory contents. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain insight into internal services and workflows, increasing the risk of unauthorized access and elevated privileges when combined with other vulnerabilities. |
| CVE-2026-76706 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information. Successful exploitation could result in the disclosure of security-relevant configuration details and security feature status, which could be used to facilitate further attacks. |
| CVE-2026-76705 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the API endpoint of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated remote attacker with Admin privilege to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. |
| CVE-2026-76704 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim's browser in the context of the affected interface. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to access sensitive information, potentially affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the data processed by the application. |
| CVE-2026-76703 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways that could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative access to cause a denial of service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to disrupt system operations, potentially resulting in an unstable system state. |
| CVE-2026-76702 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the operating system of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an authenticated local attacker to cause a denial-of-service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to disrupt system operations, potentially resulting in an unstable system state. |
| CVE-2026-76701 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access sensitive information. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. |
| CVE-2026-76700 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerabilities in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to interrupt the normal operation of the affected service. |
| CVE-2026-76699 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in a system service within the underlying operating system of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways that could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to cause a denial-of-service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to crash the impacted service and temporarily disrupting network operations. |
| CVE-2026-76698 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A command injection vulnerability exists in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. An authenticated remote attacker with limited access privileges could exploit this vulnerability through specially crafted input. Successful exploitation, under certain conditions, could result in the execution of arbitrary commands with elevated privileges or a denial-of-service condition on the affected appliance. |
| CVE-2026-76697 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow a remote attacker authenticated with low privileges to access sensitive information. A successful exploit allows an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. |
| CVE-2026-76696 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to conduct a denial of service attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to crash the system, preventing it from rebooting without manual intervention and disrupting network operations. |
| CVE-2026-76695 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to send specially crafted packets to the affected service. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to affect the integrity and availability of the affected service. |
| CVE-2026-76694 | Medium | 2026-09-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the command line interface of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Gateways. Successful exploitation could allow an authenticated remote attacker with high privileges to escalate privileges beyond their authorized level, and execute arbitrary code on a vulnerable system. |
| CVE-2026-35502 | Medium | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Deserialization of untrusted data for some Intel(R) Extension for PyTorch before version 2.8.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (low) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-24693 | Medium | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) oneCCL Bindings for PyTorch before version v2.8.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-21387 | Medium | 2026-08-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) LLM Library for PyTorch within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. |
| CVE-2026-13243 | Medium | 2026-07-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Salesforce Suite allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Salesforce Suite versions: from 0.0.0 to 5.1.3. |
| CVE-2026-49099 | Medium | 2026-07-06 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Salesforce Component. The camel-salesforce producer resolves its operation parameters - the SOQL query, the SOSL search, the target SObject name and id, the Apex REST URL and method, and the Apex query parameters - from Exchange message headers, reading the header in preference to the value configured on the endpoint (AbstractSalesforceProcessor.getParameter() reads the header first and uses the endpoint configuration only as a fallback). The control-header constants in SalesforceEndpointConfig (for example SOBJECT_QUERY = sObjectQuery, SOBJECT_SEARCH = sObjectSearch, SOBJECT_NAME = sObjectName, SOBJECT_ID = sObjectId, APEX_URL = apexUrl, APEX_METHOD = apexMethod, and the apexQueryParam. prefix) used plain, non-Camel-prefixed values. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a salesforce: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set these headers and override what the route intended - supplying its own SOQL query or SOSL search to read data from any SObject the connected Salesforce user can access, overriding the target SObject name and id for CRUD operations, or redirecting an Apex REST call to a different endpoint and HTTP method (including destructive methods) with injected query parameters. All such operations run with the full permissions of the Salesforce connected (integration) user, which is typically broad. No credentials are required from the attacker when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set Salesforce operation parameters via the raw header names must use the CamelSalesforce* names (for example CamelSalesforceSObjectQuery and CamelSalesforceApexUrl) instead of the old sObject* / apex* values; the endpoint-option spelling is unchanged. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Salesforce control headers from any untrusted ingress before the salesforce: producer (for example removeHeaders('sObject*') and removeHeaders('apex*') at the start of the route), and set the query, SObject and Apex parameters from a trusted source. |
| CVE-2026-42780 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A directory traversal vulnerability exists in BIG-IP SSL Orchestrator that allows an authenticated attacker with high privilege to overwrite, delete or corrupt arbitrary local files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42408 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When BIG-IP DNS is provisioned, a vulnerability exists in an undisclosed TMOS Shell (tmsh) command that may allow a highly privileged authenticated attacker to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42063 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability exists in iControl SOAP where an authenticated attacker with the Resource Administrator or Administrator role can download sensitive files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-42058 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated attacker's undisclosed requests to BIG-IP iControl REST can lead to an information leak of BIG-IP local user account names. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-41954 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sensitive information disclosure vulnerability exists in the undisclosed iControl REST endpoint and TMOS Shell (tmsh) command which may allow an authenticated attacker with resource administrator role privileges to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40703 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the dashboard of the BIG-IP Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-40435 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When configured, IP-based access restrictions for httpd do not cover all endpoints, which may allow connections from blocked addresses. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-34019 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) is configured in Static and Dynamic routing protocols, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to stop processing BFD packets and cause the configured routing protocol to fail over. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-24464 | Medium | 2026-05-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When running in Appliance mode, a directory traversal vulnerability exists in an undisclosed iControl REST endpoint that may allow an authenticated attacker with administrator role privileges to cross a security boundary and delete files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-13213 | Medium | 2026-03-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Aspera Orchestrator 3.0.0 through 4.1.2 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking |
| CVE-2026-1344 | Medium | 2026-02-18 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Tanium addressed an insecure file permissions vulnerability in Enforce Recovery Key Portal. |
| CVE-2026-25650 | Medium | 2026-02-06 | Not applicable | No public exploit | MCP Salesforce Connector is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation for Salesforce integration. Prior to 0.1.10, arbitrary attribute access leads to disclosure of Salesforce auth token. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.1.10. |
| CVE-2026-24903 | Medium | 2026-02-06 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | OrcaStatLLM Researcher is an LLM Based Research Paper Generator. A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was discovered in the Log Message in the Session Page in OrcaStatLLM-Researcher that allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript code in victims' browsers through malicious research topic inputs. |
| CVE-2025-15343 | Medium | 2026-02-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Tanium addressed an incorrect default permissions vulnerability in Enforce. |
| CVE-2025-15328 | Medium | 2026-02-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Tanium addressed an improper link resolution before file access vulnerability in Enforce. |
| CVE-2025-37185 | Medium | 2026-01-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an authenticated remote attacker to conduct a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks against an administrative user of the interface. A successful exploit allows an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim's browser in the context of the affected interface and thereby make unauthorized arbitrary configuration changes to the host. |
| CVE-2025-13211 | Medium | 2025-12-11 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.0.0 through 4.1.0 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service in the email service due to improper control of interaction frequency. |
| CVE-2025-64322 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.3.0. |
| CVE-2025-64321 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Manipulating Writeable Configuration Files.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.3.0. |
| CVE-2025-64320 | Medium | 2025-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper Neutralization of Input Used for LLM Prompting vulnerability in Salesforce Agentforce Vibes Extension allows Code Injection.This issue affects Agentforce Vibes Extension: before 3.2.0. |
| CVE-2025-59268 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On the BIG-IP system, undisclosed endpoints that contain static non-sensitive information are accessible to an unauthenticated remote attacker through the Configuration utility. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-58424 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | On BIG-IP systems, undisclosed traffic can cause data corruption and unauthorized data modification in protocols which do not have message integrity protection. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-54755 | Medium | 2025-10-15 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A directory traversal vulnerability exists in TMUI that allows a highly privileged authenticated attacker to access files which are not limited to the intended files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-55554 | Medium | 2025-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | pytorch v2.8.0 was discovered to contain an integer overflow in the component torch.nan_to_num-.long(). |
| CVE-2025-46153 | Medium | 2025-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | PyTorch before 3.7.0 has a bernoulli_p decompose function in decompositions.py even though it lacks full consistency with the eager CPU implementation, negatively affecting nn.Dropout1d, nn.Dropout2d, and nn.Dropout3d for fallback_random=True. |
| CVE-2025-46152 | Medium | 2025-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In PyTorch before 2.7.0, bitwise_right_shift produces incorrect output for certain out-of-bounds values of the "other" argument. |
| CVE-2025-46150 | Medium | 2025-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In PyTorch before 2.7.0, when torch.compile is used, FractionalMaxPool2d has inconsistent results. |
| CVE-2025-46149 | Medium | 2025-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In PyTorch before 2.7.0, when inductor is used, nn.Fold has an assertion error. |
| CVE-2025-46148 | Medium | 2025-09-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In PyTorch through 2.6.0, when eager is used, nn.PairwiseDistance(p=2) produces incorrect results. |
| CVE-2025-54500 | Medium | 2025-08-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An HTTP/2 implementation flaw allows a denial-of-service (DoS) that uses malformed HTTP/2 control frames in order to break the max concurrent streams limit (HTTP/2 MadeYouReset Attack). Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-47436 | Medium | 2025-05-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Apache ORC. A vulnerability has been identified in the ORC C++ LZO decompression logic, where specially crafted malformed ORC files can cause the decompressor to allocate a 250-byte buffer but then attempts to copy 295 bytes into it. It causes memory corruption. This issue affects Apache ORC C++ library: through 1.8.8, from 1.9.0 through 1.9.5, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.4, from 2.1.0 through 2.1.1. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.8.9, 1.9.6, 2.0.5, and 2.1.2, which fix the issue. |
| CVE-2025-46547 | Medium | 2025-04-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Sherpa Orchestrator 141851, the web application lacks protection against CSRF attacks, with resultant effects of an attacker conducting XSS attacks, adding a new user or role, or exploiting a SQL injection issue. |
| CVE-2025-46545 | Medium | 2025-04-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Sherpa Orchestrator 141851, the functionality for adding or updating licenses allows for stored XSS attacks by an administrator through the name parameter. The XSS payload can execute when the license expires. |
| CVE-2025-46544 | Medium | 2025-04-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In Sherpa Orchestrator 141851, a low-privileged user can elevate their privileges by creating new users and roles. |
| CVE-2025-3730 | Medium | 2025-04-16 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in PyTorch 2.6.0. Affected is the function torch.nn.functional.ctc_loss of the file aten/src/ATen/native/LossCTC.cpp. The manipulation leads to denial of service. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The name of the patch is 46fc5d8e360127361211cb237d5f9eef0223e567. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The security policy of the project warns to use unknown models which might establish malicious effects. |
| CVE-2025-3136 | Medium | 2025-04-03 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in PyTorch 2.6.0. This issue affects the function torch.cuda.memory.caching_allocator_delete of the file c10/cuda/CUDACachingAllocator.cpp. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-3121 | Medium | 2025-04-02 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in PyTorch 2.6.0. Affected is the function torch.jit.jit_module_from_flatbuffer. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-3001 | Medium | 2025-03-31 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability classified as critical was found in PyTorch 2.6.0. This vulnerability affects the function torch.lstm_cell. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-3000 | Medium | 2025-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in PyTorch 2.6.0. This affects the function torch.jit.script. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-2999 | Medium | 2025-03-31 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability was found in PyTorch 2.6.0. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function torch.nn.utils.rnn.unpack_sequence. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-2998 | Medium | 2025-03-31 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in PyTorch 2.6.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function torch.nn.utils.rnn.pad_packed_sequence. The manipulation leads to memory corruption. Local access is required to approach this attack. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| CVE-2025-2953 | Medium | 2025-03-30 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in PyTorch 2.6.0+cu124. Affected by this issue is the function torch.mkldnn_max_pool2d. The manipulation leads to denial of service. An attack has to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The real existence of this vulnerability is still doubted at the moment. The security policy of the project warns to use unknown models which might establish malicious effects. |
| CVE-2025-30196 | Medium | 2025-03-19 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Jenkins AnchorChain Plugin 1.0 does not limit URL schemes for links it creates based on workspace content, allowing the `javascript:` scheme, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers able to control the input file for the Anchor Chain post-build step. |
| CVE-2025-24320 | Medium | 2025-02-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-31156 https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000138636 . Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2025-21552 | Medium | 2025-01-21 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: E1 IOT Orchestrator Security). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 9.2.9.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2024-52543 | Medium | 2024-12-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell NativeEdge, version(s) 2.1.0.0, contain(s) a Creation of Temporary File With Insecure Permissions vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2024-49505 | Medium | 2024-11-13 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in openSUSE Tumbleweed MirrorCache allows the execution of arbitrary JS via reflected XSS in the REGEX and P parameters. This issue affects MirrorCache before 1.083. |
| CVE-2024-20385 | Medium | 2024-10-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the SSL/TLS implementation of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Orchestrator (NDO) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to intercept sensitive information from an affected device. This vulnerability exists because the Cisco NDO Validate Peer Certificate site management feature validates the certificates for Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC), Cisco Cloud Network Controller (CNC), and Cisco Nexus Dashboard only when a new site is added or an existing one is reregistered. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by using machine-in-the-middle techniques to intercept the traffic between the affected device and Cisco NDO and then using a crafted certificate to impersonate the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to learn sensitive information during communications between these devices. |
| CVE-2024-8585 | Medium | 2024-09-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Orca HCM from LEARNING DIGITA does not properly restrict a specific parameter of the file download functionality, allowing a remote attacker with regular privileges to download arbitrary system files. |
| CVE-2024-41723 | Medium | 2024-08-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Undisclosed requests to BIG-IP iControl REST can lead to information leak of user account names. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2024-6987 | Medium | 2024-08-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The Orchid Store theme for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'orchid_store_activate_plugin' function in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.6. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to activate the Addonify Floating Cart For WooCommerce plugin if it is installed. |
| CVE-2023-38001 | Medium | 2024-07-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 260206. |
| CVE-2023-26289 | Medium | 2024-07-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.0.1 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 248478. |
| CVE-2023-26288 | Medium | 2024-07-30 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.0.1 does not invalidate session after a password change which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 248477. |
| CVE-2024-22444 | Medium | 2024-07-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability within the web-based management interface of EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow a remote attacker to conduct a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victims browser in the context of the affected interface. |
| CVE-2024-21168 | Medium | 2024-07-16 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: E1 IOT Orchestrator Security). Supported versions that are affected are Prior to 9.2.8.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Orchestrator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| CVE-2024-36395 | Medium | 2024-06-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Verint - CWE-80: Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) |
| CVE-2024-5770 | Medium | 2024-06-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The WP Force SSL & HTTPS SSL Redirect plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'ajax_save_setting' function in versions up to, and including, 1.66. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, subscriber-level permissions and above, to update the plugin settings. |
| CVE-2024-20369 | Medium | 2024-05-15 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Crosswork Network Services Orchestrator (NSO) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to redirect a user to a malicious web page. This vulnerability is due to improper input validation of a parameter in an HTTP request. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to redirect a user to a malicious website. |
| CVE-2024-33604 | Medium | 2024-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exist in undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2024-32761 | Medium | 2024-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Under certain conditions, a data leak may occur in the Traffic Management Microkernels (TMMs) of BIG-IP tenants running on VELOS and rSeries platforms. This leak occurs randomly and cannot be deliberately triggered. If it occurs, it may leak up to 64 bytes of non-contiguous randomized bytes. Under rare conditions, this may lead to a TMM restart, affecting availability. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2024-28889 | Medium | 2024-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When an SSL profile with alert timeout is configured with a non-default value on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic along with conditions beyond the attacker's control can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2024-27202 | Medium | 2024-05-08 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A DOM-based cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in an undisclosed page of the BIG-IP Configuration utility that allows an attacker to run JavaScript in the context of the currently logged-in user. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-27283 | Medium | 2024-05-04 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | IBM Aspera Orchestrator 4.0.1 could allow a remote attacker to enumerate usernames due to observable response discrepancies. IBM X-Force ID: 248545. |
| CVE-2024-31584 | Medium | 2024-04-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Pytorch before v2.2.0 has an Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability via the component torch/csrc/jit/mobile/flatbuffer_loader.cpp. |
| CVE-2024-31580 | Medium | 2024-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | PyTorch before v2.2.0 was discovered to contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the component /runtime/vararg_functions.cpp. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. |
| CVE-2024-20302 | Medium | 2024-04-03 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A vulnerability in the tenant security implementation of Cisco Nexus Dashboard Orchestrator (NDO) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to modify or delete tenant templates on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to improper access controls within tenant security. An attacker who is using a valid user account with write privileges and either a Site Manager or Tenant Manager role could exploit this vulnerability. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify or delete tenant templates under non-associated tenants, which could disrupt network traffic. |
| CVE-2023-49508 | Medium | 2024-02-16 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Directory Traversal vulnerability in YetiForceCompany YetiForceCRM versions 6.4.0 and before allows a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information via the license parameter in the LibraryLicense.php component. |
| CVE-2024-23976 | Medium | 2024-02-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When running in Appliance mode, an authenticated attacker assigned the Administrator role may be able to bypass Appliance mode restrictions utilizing iAppsLX templates on a BIG-IP system. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2024-21782 | Medium | 2024-02-14 | Not applicable | No public exploit | BIG-IP or BIG-IQ Resource Administrators and Certificate Managers who have access to the secure copy (scp) utility but do not have access to Advanced shell (bash) can execute arbitrary commands with a specially crafted command string. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-5873. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated |
| CVE-2024-22021 | Medium | 2024-02-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Vulnerability CVE-2024-22021 allows a Veeam Recovery Orchestrator user with a low privileged role (Plan Author) to retrieve plans from a Scope other than the one they are assigned to. |
| CVE-2023-37982 | Medium | 2023-12-19 | Not applicable | No public exploit | URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability in CRM Perks Integration for Salesforce and Contact Form 7, WPForms, Elementor, Ninja Forms.This issue affects Integration for Salesforce and Contact Form 7, WPForms, Elementor, Ninja Forms: from n/a through 1.3.3. |
| CVE-2023-48299 | Medium | 2023-11-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | TorchServe is a tool for serving and scaling PyTorch models in production. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 0.9.0, using the model/workflow management API, there is a chance of uploading potentially harmful archives that contain files that are extracted to any location on the filesystem that is within the process permissions. Leveraging this issue could aid third-party actors in hiding harmful code in open-source/public models, which can be downloaded from the internet, and take advantage of machines running Torchserve. The ZipSlip issue in TorchServe has been fixed by validating the paths of files contained within a zip archive before extracting them. TorchServe release 0.9.0 includes fixes to address the ZipSlip vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-5445 | Medium | 2023-11-17 | No exploit published | No public exploit | An open redirect vulnerability in ePolicy Orchestrator prior to 5.10.0 CP1 Update 2, allows a remote low privileged user to modify the URL parameter for the purpose of redirecting URL request(s) to a malicious site. This impacts the dashboard area of the user interface. A user would need to be logged into ePO to trigger this vulnerability. To exploit this the attacker must change the HTTP payload post submission, prior to it reaching the ePO server. |
| CVE-2023-5585 | Medium | 2023-10-15 | Not applicable | Proof of concept only | A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Motorcycle Rental System 1.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/?page=bike of the component Bike List. The manipulation of the argument Model with the input "><script>confirm (document.cookie)</script> leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-242170 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. |
| CVE-2023-45219 | Medium | 2023-10-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Exposure of Sensitive Information vulnerability exist in an undisclosed BIG-IP TMOS shell (tmsh) command which may allow an authenticated attacker with resource administrator role privileges to view sensitive information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2023-43485 | Medium | 2023-10-10 | Not applicable | No public exploit | When TACACS+ audit forwarding is configured on BIG-IP or BIG-IQ system, sharedsecret is logged in plaintext in the audit log. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |