Overview 30 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 0 public PoC · 2 EPSS ≥ 0.5
30matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
1exploited3.3%
1CISA KEV3.3%
0public PoC0.0%
2EPSS ≥ 0.56.7%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
11
36.7%
Not applicable
19
63.3%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
30
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
3.3%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
3
10.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
26
86.7%
split by
peak 6 / quarter
Q1 196
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable5
Critical6
not blocked6
No public exploit6
Q2 190
Q3 192
Not applicable2
Critical2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q4 193
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable2
Critical3
not blocked3
No public exploit3
Q1 200
Q2 201
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q3 200
Q4 201
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Q1 211
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 215
Not applicable5
Critical5
not blocked5
No public exploit5
Q3 211
Not applicable1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 210
Q1 220
Q2 224
Outside Waratek scope3
Not applicable1
Critical4
not blocked4
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit3
Q3 222
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Critical2
not blocked2
Proof of concept only1
No public exploit1
Q4 220
Q1 230
Q2 230
Q3 231
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 230
Q1 240
Q2 242
Outside Waratek scope1
Not applicable1
Critical2
not blocked2
No public exploit2
Q3 240
Q4 241
Outside Waratek scope1
Critical1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21Q4 21Q2 22Q4 22Q2 23Q4 23Q2 24Q4 24
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-4741 | Critical | 2024-11-13 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications. The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not currently in use. However, two scenarios have been identified where the buffer is freed even when still in use. The first scenario occurs where a record header has been received from the network and processed by OpenSSL, but the full record body has not yet arrived. In this case calling SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though a record has only been partially processed and the buffer is still in use. The second scenario occurs where a full record containing application data has been received and processed by OpenSSL but the application has only read part of this data. Again a call to SSL_free_buffers will succeed even though the buffer is still in use. While these scenarios could occur accidentally during normal operation a malicious attacker could attempt to engineer a stituation where this occurs. We are not aware of this issue being actively exploited. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. |
| CVE-2024-5535 | Critical | 2024-06-27 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available. |
| CVE-2024-21990 | Critical | 2024-04-17 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 9.12.1.x, 9.13.1.x and 9.14.1.x contain hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to view Deploy configuration information and modify the account credentials. |
| CVE-2023-37920 | Critical | 2023-07-25 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | Certifi is a curated collection of Root Certificates for validating the trustworthiness of SSL certificates while verifying the identity of TLS hosts. Certifi prior to version 2023.07.22 recognizes "e-Tugra" root certificates. e-Tugra's root certificates were subject to an investigation prompted by reporting of security issues in their systems. Certifi 2023.07.22 removes root certificates from "e-Tugra" from the root store. |
| CVE-2020-35527 | Critical | 2022-09-01 | Not applicable | No public exploit | In SQLite 3.31.1, there is an out of bounds access problem through ALTER TABLE for views that have a nested FROM clause. |
| CVE-2022-37434 | Critical | 2022-08-05 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | zlib through 1.2.12 has a heap-based buffer over-read or buffer overflow in inflate in inflate.c via a large gzip header extra field. NOTE: only applications that call inflateGetHeader are affected. Some common applications bundle the affected zlib source code but may be unable to call inflateGetHeader (e.g., see the nodejs/node reference). |
| CVE-2022-2068 | Critical | 2022-06-21 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). |
| CVE-2022-1664 | Critical | 2022-05-26 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dpkg::Source::Archive in dpkg, the Debian package management system, before version 1.21.8, 1.20.10, 1.19.8, 1.18.26 is prone to a directory traversal vulnerability. When extracting untrusted source packages in v2 and v3 source package formats that include a debian.tar, the in-place extraction can lead to directory traversal situations on specially crafted orig.tar and debian.tar tarballs. |
| CVE-2022-1587 | Critical | 2022-05-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was discovered in the PCRE2 library in the get_recurse_data_length() function of the pcre2_jit_compile.c file. This issue affects recursions in JIT-compiled regular expressions caused by duplicate data transfers. |
| CVE-2022-1586 | Critical | 2022-05-16 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | An out-of-bounds read vulnerability was discovered in the PCRE2 library in the compile_xclass_matchingpath() function of the pcre2_jit_compile.c file. This involves a unicode property matching issue in JIT-compiled regular expressions. The issue occurs because the character was not fully read in case-less matching within JIT. |
| CVE-2021-35942 | Critical | 2021-07-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | The wordexp function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc) through 2.33 may crash or read arbitrary memory in parse_param (in posix/wordexp.c) when called with an untrusted, crafted pattern, potentially resulting in a denial of service or disclosure of information. This occurs because atoi was used but strtoul should have been used to ensure correct calculations. |
| CVE-2021-3520 | Critical | 2021-06-02 | Not applicable | No public exploit | There's a flaw in lz4. An attacker who submits a crafted file to an application linked with lz4 may be able to trigger an integer overflow, leading to calling of memmove() on a negative size argument, causing an out-of-bounds write and/or a crash. The greatest impact of this flaw is to availability, with some potential impact to confidentiality and integrity as well. |
| CVE-2020-36331 | Critical | 2021-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. An out-of-bounds read was found in function ChunkAssignData. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and to the service availability. |
| CVE-2020-36330 | Critical | 2021-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. An out-of-bounds read was found in function ChunkVerifyAndAssign. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and to the service availability. |
| CVE-2020-36329 | Critical | 2021-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. A use-after-free was found due to a thread being killed too early. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. |
| CVE-2020-36328 | Critical | 2021-05-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | A flaw was found in libwebp in versions before 1.0.1. A heap-based buffer overflow in function WebPDecodeRGBInto is possible due to an invalid check for buffer size. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. |
| CVE-2021-3177 | Critical | 2021-01-19 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely. |
| CVE-2020-15999 | Critical | 2020-11-03 | Not applicable | Exploited | Heap buffer overflow in Freetype in Google Chrome prior to 86.0.4240.111 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. |
| CVE-2020-11656 | Critical | 2020-04-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In SQLite through 3.31.1, the ALTER TABLE implementation has a use-after-free, as demonstrated by an ORDER BY clause that belongs to a compound SELECT statement. |
| CVE-2019-19646 | Critical | 2019-12-09 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | pragma.c in SQLite through 3.30.1 mishandles NOT NULL in an integrity_check PRAGMA command in certain cases of generated columns. |
| CVE-2019-19317 | Critical | 2019-12-05 | Not applicable | No public exploit | lookupName in resolve.c in SQLite 3.30.1 omits bits from the colUsed bitmask in the case of a generated column, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact. |
| CVE-2019-5509 | Critical | 2019-11-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.11.2 through 2.12.2 are susceptible to a code injection vulnerability which when successfully exploited could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enable and use a privileged user account. |
| CVE-2019-5505 | Critical | 2019-09-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.2 through 2.12.1 transmit credentials in plaintext. |
| CVE-2019-5504 | Critical | 2019-09-24 | Not applicable | No public exploit | ONTAP Select Deploy administration utility versions 2.12 & 2.12.1 ship with an HTTP service bound to the network allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to perform administrative actions. |
| CVE-2019-3861 | Critical | 2019-03-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SSH packets with a padding length value greater than the packet length are parsed. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-3860 | Critical | 2019-03-25 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SFTP packets with empty payloads are parsed. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-3862 | Critical | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the way SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_REQUEST packets with an exit status message and no payload are parsed. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-3859 | Critical | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 in the _libssh2_packet_require and _libssh2_packet_requirev functions. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-3858 | Critical | 2019-03-21 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An out of bounds read flaw was discovered in libssh2 before 1.8.1 when a specially crafted SFTP packet is received from the server. A remote attacker who compromises a SSH server may be able to cause a Denial of Service or read data in the client memory. |
| CVE-2019-9169 | Critical | 2019-02-26 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, proceed_next_node in posix/regexec.c has a heap-based buffer over-read via an attempted case-insensitive regular-expression match. |