WaratekVRT Sign in
Reset
More filters (2)
Columns
Including CVEs outside Waratek scope✕Protection: None✕Product oncommand system manager✕
Overview 24 matches · 12 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 3 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 6 public PoC · 5 EPSS ≥ 0.5
24matches 12in Waratek scope50.0% 0protected0.0% 3exploited12.5% 1CISA KEV4.2% 6public PoC25.0% 5EPSS ≥ 0.520.8%
Protected by Waratek 0 0.0% Rule in development 0 0.0% Mitigation candidate 2 8.3% No exploit published 10 41.7% Outside Waratek scope 12 50.0% Not applicable 0 0.0% Withdrawn CVE 0 0.0%
Critical 2 8.3% High 10 41.7% Medium 12 50.0% Low 0 0.0% None 0 0.0% Unknown 0 0.0%
blocked by ARMR today 0 0.0% partly blocked 0 0.0% not blocked 24 100.0% not established 0 0.0% unrecorded 0 0.0%
Exploited 3 12.5% Working exploit published 2 8.3% Proof of concept only 1 4.2% Forecast only 1 4.2% No public exploit 17 70.8%
split by peak 6 / quarter
Outside Waratek scope: 12No exploit published: 10Mitigation candidate: 2 Medium: 12High: 10Critical: 2 not blocked: 24 No public exploit: 17Forecast only: 1Proof of concept only: 1Working exploit published: 2Exploited: 3
Q3 161 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q4 160 Q1 171 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q2 170 Q3 171 Outside Waratek scope1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q4 170 Q1 180 Q2 183 No exploit published3 Critical2 High1 not blocked3 No public exploit3 Q3 180 Q4 180 Q1 190 Q2 193 No exploit published2 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium3 not blocked3 Exploited1 No public exploit2 Q3 190 Q4 191 No exploit published1 High1 not blocked1 No public exploit1 Q1 206 No exploit published1 Outside Waratek scope5 High2 Medium4 not blocked6 Working exploit published1 No public exploit5 Q2 203 Mitigation candidate1 Outside Waratek scope2 High1 Medium2 not blocked3 Exploited2 Proof of concept only1 Q3 202 Mitigation candidate1 No exploit published1 High2 not blocked2 Working exploit published1 Forecast only1 Q4 202 No exploit published2 High1 Medium1 not blocked2 No public exploit2 Q1 211 Outside Waratek scope1 Medium1 not blocked1 No public exploit1
Q3 16Q1 17Q3 17Q1 18Q3 18Q1 19Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20Q1 21
24 matches Sign in to download these CVEs as CSV or JSON, or to follow them in a feed.
CVE Severity Published▾ Status Exploitation Description
CVE-2020-8587 Medium 2021-02-08 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit OnCommand System Manager 9.x versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.4 prior to 9.4P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow HTTP clients to cache sensitive responses making them accessible to an attacker who has access to the system where the client runs.
CVE-2020-17527 High 2020-12-03 No exploit published No public exploit While investigating bug 64830 it was discovered that Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0-M1 to 9.0.39 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 could re-use an HTTP request header value from the previous stream received on an HTTP/2 connection for the request associated with the subsequent stream. While this would most likely lead to an error and the closure of the HTTP/2 connection, it is possible that information could leak between requests.
CVE-2020-27218 Medium 2020-11-28 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty version 9.4.0.RC0 to 9.4.34.v20201102, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.0.beta2, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.0.beta2, if GZIP request body inflation is enabled and requests from different clients are multiplexed onto a single connection, and if an attacker can send a request with a body that is received entirely but not consumed by the application, then a subsequent request on the same connection will see that body prepended to its body. The attacker will not see any data but may inject data into the body of the subsequent request.
CVE-2020-13935 High 2020-07-14 Mitigation candidate Working exploit published The payload length in a WebSocket frame was not correctly validated in Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.36, 8.5.0 to 8.5.56 and 7.0.27 to 7.0.104. Invalid payload lengths could trigger an infinite loop. Multiple requests with invalid payload lengths could lead to a denial of service.
CVE-2020-13934 High 2020-07-14 No exploit published Forecast only An h2c direct connection to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M6, 9.0.0.M5 to 9.0.36 and 8.5.1 to 8.5.56 did not release the HTTP/1.1 processor after the upgrade to HTTP/2. If a sufficient number of such requests were made, an OutOfMemoryException could occur leading to a denial of service.
CVE-2020-11996 High 2020-06-26 Mitigation candidate Proof of concept only A specially crafted sequence of HTTP/2 requests sent to Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M5, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.35 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.55 could trigger high CPU usage for several seconds. If a sufficient number of such requests were made on concurrent HTTP/2 connections, the server could become unresponsive.
CVE-2020-11023 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2020-11022 Medium 2020-04-29 Outside Waratek scope Exploited In jQuery starting with 1.12.0 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0.
CVE-2019-17276 Medium 2020-03-24 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit OnCommand System Manager versions 9.3 prior to 9.3P18 and 9.4 prior to 9.4P2 are susceptible to a cross site scripting vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker to inject arbitrary scripts into the SNMP Community Names label field.
CVE-2020-1935 Medium 2020-02-24 No exploit published No public exploit In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.
CVE-2019-17569 Medium 2020-02-24 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely.
CVE-2013-3322 High 2020-01-31 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit NetApp OnCommand System Manager 2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary commands in the Halt/Reboot interface.
CVE-2013-3321 High 2020-01-29 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit NetApp OnCommand System Manager 2.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to include arbitrary files through specially crafted requests to the "diagnostic" page using the SnapMirror log path parameter.
CVE-2013-3320 Medium 2020-01-29 Outside Waratek scope Working exploit published Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in NetApp OnCommand System Manager before 2.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the 'full-name' and 'comment' fields.
CVE-2019-12418 High 2019-12-23 No exploit published No public exploit When Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.28, 8.5.0 to 8.5.47, 7.0.0 and 7.0.97 is configured with the JMX Remote Lifecycle Listener, a local attacker without access to the Tomcat process or configuration files is able to manipulate the RMI registry to perform a man-in-the-middle attack to capture user names and passwords used to access the JMX interface. The attacker can then use these credentials to access the JMX interface and gain complete control over the Tomcat instance.
CVE-2019-10247 Medium 2019-04-22 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty version 7.x, 8.x, 9.2.27 and older, 9.3.26 and older, and 9.4.16 and older, the server running on any OS and Jetty version combination will reveal the configured fully qualified directory base resource location on the output of the 404 error for not finding a Context that matches the requested path. The default server behavior on jetty-distribution and jetty-home will include at the end of the Handler tree a DefaultHandler, which is responsible for reporting this 404 error, it presents the various configured contexts as HTML for users to click through to. This produced HTML includes output that contains the configured fully qualified directory base resource location for each context.
CVE-2019-10246 Medium 2019-04-22 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty version 9.2.27, 9.3.26, and 9.4.16, the server running on Windows is vulnerable to exposure of the fully qualified Base Resource directory name on Windows to a remote client when it is configured for showing a Listing of directory contents. This information reveal is restricted to only the content in the configured base resource directories.
CVE-2019-11358 Medium 2019-04-20 Outside Waratek scope Exploited jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype.
CVE-2017-7658 Critical 2018-06-26 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization.
CVE-2017-7657 Critical 2018-06-26 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request.
CVE-2018-12538 High 2018-06-22 No exploit published No public exploit In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.8, when using the optional Jetty provided FileSessionDataStore for persistent storage of HttpSession details, it is possible for a malicious user to access/hijack other HttpSessions and even delete unmatched HttpSessions present in the FileSystem's storage for the FileSessionDataStore.
CVE-2016-5045 High 2017-07-03 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit NetApp OnCommand System Manager before 9.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive credentials via vectors related to cluster peering setup.
CVE-2016-3063 High 2017-02-07 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit Multiple functions in NetApp OnCommand System Manager before 8.3.2 do not properly escape special characters, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary API calls via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2016-5047 Medium 2016-09-01 Outside Waratek scope No public exploit NetApp OnCommand System Manager 8.3.x before 8.3.2P5 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors.