Redhat Migration Toolkit CVEs
5 CVEs, 1 exploited, 1 protected by Waratek
Overview 5 matches · 1 protected · 1 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 1 EPSS ≥ 0.5
Protected by Waratek
1
20.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
1
20.0%
No exploit published
3
60.0%
blocked by ARMR today
1
20.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
80.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
1
20.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
20.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
3
60.0%
split by
peak 1 / month
Feb 231
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Mar 230
Apr 230
May 231
No exploit published1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Jun 230
Jul 230
Aug 230
Sep 230
Oct 231
Mitigation candidate1
High1
not blocked1
Exploited1
Nov 230
Dec 230
Jan 241
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Feb 240
Mar 240
Apr 241
Protected by Waratek1
High1
blocked by ARMR today1
Proof of concept only1
Feb 23Apr 23Jun 23Aug 23Oct 23Dec 23Feb 24Apr 24
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-1132 | High | 2024-04-17 | Protected by Waratek | Proof of concept only | A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL. |
| CVE-2023-6291 | High | 2024-01-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in the redirect_uri validation logic in Keycloak. This issue may allow a bypass of otherwise explicitly allowed hosts. A successful attack may lead to an access token being stolen, making it possible for the attacker to impersonate other users. |
| CVE-2023-44487 | High | 2023-10-10 | Mitigation candidate | Exploited | The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. |
| CVE-2023-1664 | Medium | 2023-05-26 | No exploit published | No public exploit | A flaw was found in Keycloak. This flaw depends on a non-default configuration "Revalidate Client Certificate" to be enabled and the reverse proxy is not validating the certificate before Keycloak. Using this method an attacker may choose the certificate which will be validated by the server. If this happens and the KC_SPI_TRUSTSTORE_FILE_FILE variable is missing/misconfigured, any trustfile may be accepted with the logging information of "Cannot validate client certificate trust: Truststore not available". This may not impact availability as the attacker would have no access to the server, but consumer applications Integrity or Confidentiality may be impacted considering a possible access to them. Considering the environment is correctly set to use "Revalidate Client Certificate" this flaw is avoidable. |
| CVE-2022-4492 | High | 2023-02-23 | No exploit published | No public exploit | The undertow client is not checking the server identity presented by the server certificate in https connections. This is a compulsory step (at least it should be performed by default) in https and in http/2. I would add it to any TLS client protocol. |