Overview 8,566 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 167 exploited · 84 CISA KEV · 719 public PoC · 237 EPSS ≥ 0.5
8,566matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
167exploited1.9%
84CISA KEV1.0%
719public PoC8.4%
237EPSS ≥ 0.52.8%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
0
0.0%
Not applicable
8,566
100.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
8,566
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
split by
peak 896 / year
19981
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
19995
Not applicable5
High2
Medium1
Low2
not blocked5
Working exploit published1
No public exploit4
200014
Not applicable14
High5
Medium8
Low1
not blocked14
Working exploit published6
No public exploit8
200114
Not applicable14
High10
Medium2
Low2
not blocked14
Working exploit published2
No public exploit12
200224
Not applicable24
High11
Medium12
Low1
not blocked24
Working exploit published5
No public exploit19
200312
Not applicable12
High5
Medium6
Low1
not blocked12
Working exploit published3
No public exploit9
200434
Not applicable34
Critical1
High17
Medium13
Low3
not blocked34
Exploited2
Working exploit published5
No public exploit27
200592
Not applicable92
Critical1
High52
Medium32
Low7
not blocked92
Exploited1
Working exploit published29
No public exploit62
2006124
Not applicable124
High49
Medium67
Low8
not blocked124
Working exploit published38
No public exploit86
2007144
Not applicable144
High75
Medium61
Low8
not blocked144
Working exploit published45
No public exploit99
2008127
Not applicable127
High70
Medium51
Low6
not blocked127
Exploited1
Working exploit published52
No public exploit74
2009174
Not applicable174
High103
Medium61
Low10
not blocked174
Working exploit published73
No public exploit101
2010126
Not applicable126
High68
Medium54
Low4
not blocked126
Working exploit published37
No public exploit89
2011117
Not applicable117
High62
Medium49
Low6
not blocked117
Working exploit published27
No public exploit90
201297
Not applicable97
Critical1
High24
Medium66
Low6
not blocked97
Working exploit published22
No public exploit75
2013178
Not applicable178
Critical1
High58
Medium89
Low30
not blocked178
Exploited1
Working exploit published17
No public exploit160
2014284
Not applicable284
Critical2
High62
Medium196
Low24
not blocked284
Exploited7
Working exploit published40
Forecast only1
No public exploit236
2015247
Not applicable247
Critical1
High83
Medium126
Low37
not blocked247
Exploited3
Working exploit published23
No public exploit221
2016229
Not applicable229
Critical32
High87
Medium98
Low12
not blocked229
Exploited5
Working exploit published6
Forecast only2
No public exploit216
2017398
Not applicable398
Critical53
High134
Medium197
Low14
not blocked398
Exploited2
Working exploit published24
No public exploit372
2018635
Not applicable635
Critical82
High194
Medium350
Low9
not blocked635
Exploited7
Working exploit published33
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only6
No public exploit587
2019510
Not applicable510
Critical51
High196
Medium253
Low10
not blocked510
Exploited5
Working exploit published19
Proof of concept only5
Forecast only5
No public exploit476
2020550
Not applicable550
Critical86
High211
Medium237
Low16
not blocked550
Exploited13
Working exploit published13
Proof of concept only2
Forecast only4
No public exploit518
2021640
Not applicable640
Critical113
High248
Medium268
Low11
not blocked640
Exploited16
Working exploit published12
Proof of concept only4
Forecast only16
No public exploit592
2022585
Not applicable585
Critical72
High224
Medium284
Low5
not blocked585
Exploited24
Working exploit published12
Proof of concept only36
Forecast only12
No public exploit501
2023761
Not applicable761
Critical78
High240
Medium442
Low1
not blocked761
Exploited12
Working exploit published11
Proof of concept only56
Forecast only8
No public exploit674
2024896
Not applicable896
Critical89
High260
Medium537
Low10
not blocked896
Exploited23
Working exploit published8
Proof of concept only75
Forecast only9
No public exploit781
2025863
Not applicable863
Critical55
High199
Medium587
Low22
not blocked863
Exploited24
Working exploit published6
Proof of concept only71
Forecast only1
No public exploit761
2026685
Not applicable685
Critical75
High238
Medium356
Low16
not blocked685
Exploited21
Working exploit published2
Proof of concept only27
No public exploit635
1999200220052008201120142017202020232026
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-113373 | Critical | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 Pro does not check the local account status when a user signs in through a configured SAML or OAuth2/OpenID Connect identity provider. A user whose account was disabled or locked by an administrator in Nexus Repository can sign in again with valid identity provider credentials for the same account, and then receives a new session with the roles of that account. The attacker needs no Nexus Repository session and no Nexus Repository privilege. The attacker needs a named account that holds valid credentials at the identity provider. The anonymous user is not part of this attack path. |
| CVE-2026-113368 | Medium | 2026-11-04 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 does not check that a user account is authorized to access a repository before the repository is added as a member of a group repository. A user account that has signed in with valid credentials and holds the add or edit privilege on a group repository can add a repository that the account cannot read or browse, and then read the content of that repository through the group. The anonymous user can only do this if an administrator has explicitly granted it that privilege. |
| CVE-2026-90532 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-90531 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference ('XXE') vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-88075 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in Microsoft Configuration Manager allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| CVE-2026-83960 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-83958 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-83662 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-75732 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-48398 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-48383 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-48382 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110084 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an XML Injection (aka Blind XPath Injection) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-110083 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read and limited write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. |
| CVE-2026-110082 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If a low-privileged attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110081 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110080 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110079 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110078 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110077 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110076 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110075 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110074 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110073 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-110037 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-109415 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-107682 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-107305 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-106634 | High | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary file system write. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to write files to unauthorized locations on the file system. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-106633 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-106632 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-106631 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-106630 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-106629 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-106628 | Medium | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-106626 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-105895 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-103848 | Critical | 2026-10-13 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| CVE-2026-87110 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An unauthenticated user with network access to the Ops Manager web port can repeatedly request monitoring endpoints that perform costly work without rate limiting. This can temporarily slow other traffic served by the same process while requests continue. |
| CVE-2026-87109 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated Ops Manager organization member can retrieve another member's pending authenticator enrollment seed through user-listing endpoints while that member's enrollment is unconfirmed. This results in disclosure of secret authentication material to another member of the same organization or project. |
| CVE-2026-87108 | Low | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | An authenticated Ops Manager user with a read-only project role can retrieve a daily host monitoring record associated with a different project when they possess the required record identifier. Insufficient ownership validation can expose deployment metadata, including host and configuration details. |
| CVE-2026-78341 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-78340 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution and Filesystem access for attacker. |
| CVE-2026-78339 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-78027 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-78026 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-78025 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-78024 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Protection mechanism bypass, Server-side request forgery, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-78023 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-78022 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-78021 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure and Information exposure. |
| CVE-2026-78020 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service, Information disclosure, and Remote execution. |
| CVE-2026-78019 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Filesystem access for attacker, and Remote execution. |
| CVE-2026-78018 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-78017 | Low | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-78016 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure and Information tampering. |
| CVE-2026-78015 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Use of Less Trusted Source vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering. |
| CVE-2026-78013 | Medium | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service, Information disclosure, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-76779 | Critical | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-76769 | High | 2026-10-09 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Missing Authorization vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-76504 | Critical | 2026-09-30 | Not applicable | Exploited | A vulnerability in the API session-based authentication management of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access an affected system with privileges of the admin user. This vulnerability is due to improper handling of URI encoding in an HTTP request, which allows the request to bypass an authentication rule that is intended to restrict access to a specific API endpoint. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to the API of the affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass authentication and gain access to the API as the admin user. |
| CVE-2026-76114 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| CVE-2026-73599 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery. |
| CVE-2026-73598 | High | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges. |
| CVE-2026-73597 | High | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Launch of phishing attacks, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73596 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73595 | Critical | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains a Download of Code Without Integrity Check vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution, Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73594 | High | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73593 | Medium | 2026-09-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Active Debug Code vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-101109 | Medium | 2026-09-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - ordasoft.com - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Vehicle Manager (Free) < 6.5.8 - The public vehicle-detail page (task=view) echoes the title request parameter directly into a double-quoted HTML attribute with no output encoding of any kind. A double-quote character in the parameter closes the attribute, allowing arbitrary markup, including a <script> tag, to be injected into the page. |
| CVE-2026-101108 | Critical | 2026-09-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - ordasoft.com - Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Vehicle Manager (Free) < 6.5.8 - site/vehiclemanager.php reads the order_field and order_direction sort parameters at three separate anonymous-reachable frontend entry points (category listing, search, and the all-vehicles listing) through a sanitizing function that applies real escaping, but the value is then placed into an unquoted ORDER BY clause, where escaping has no protective effect. |
| CVE-2026-100753 | Medium | 2026-09-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - ordasoft.com - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting in Real Estate Manager (Free) < 6.7.9 - The public property-detail page’s “leave a review” form repopulates its title field directly from the request with no escaping and no filtering function of any kind, unlike the adjacent comment field on the same form, which at least receives partial tag-stripping. A " character in the title query parameter breaks out of the HTML attribute the value is placed in, allowing a following <script> element to execute in the browser of anyone who loads the crafted link. |
| CVE-2026-100752 | Critical | 2026-09-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Joomla Extension - ordasoft.com - Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Real Estate Manager (Free) < 6.7.9 - site/realestatemanager.php builds the ORDER BY clause of three separate frontend property-listing queries (category browsing, search results, and the full property listing) from a request-controlled order_field parameter, concatenated directly into an unquoted SQL clause with no allow-list of real column names and no cast. |
| CVE-2026-73591 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information exposure. |
| CVE-2026-73589 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains a Weak Encoding for Password vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73588 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Missing Authentication for Critical Function vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-73587 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass. |
| CVE-2026-73586 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Insufficient Session Expiration vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-71178 | Low | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Use of Non-Canonical URL Paths for Authorization Decisions vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-71177 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges and Session theft. |
| CVE-2026-61413 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| CVE-2026-19267 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to missing authentication on the Business Rules Manager commands REST endpoint (`CommandsResource.java:31`). A local actor can invoke unauthenticated commands to cause resource exhaustionand halt business-rule management functions. |
| CVE-2026-19179 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to manipulate database queries due to improper neutralization of special elements in a boolean expression. |
| CVE-2026-19087 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to achieve privilege escalation within the container due to improper privilege management. |
| CVE-2026-18875 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to RAG poisoning via unauthenticated runbook upsert (CWE-74) in the FTM AI agent server (api.vectordb.runbooks.js:51). An unauthenticated attacker can insert malicious runbook content into the agent's vector database to steer AI-driven MCP tool calls, potentially triggering unauthorized payment actions or exfiltrating payment data. |
| CVE-2026-18872 | Critical | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (CWE-79) in the FTM UI NetworkAcknowledgement React component (NetworkAcknowledgement.jsx:42). A malicious actor can inject script into stored network acknowledgement data that executes in authenticated operator browsers, enabling session hijacking and unauthorized operator-level payment actions. |
| CVE-2026-18505 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to open redirect in the PMP `HostHeaderFilter` (`HostHeaderFilter.java:151`). An unauthenticated attacker can craft a request with a manipulated `Host` header to redirect authenticated operators to attacker-controlled sites, enabling credential phishing. |
| CVE-2026-18490 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution via Java native deserialization on the PayDir Business Rules Manager RMI SSL endpoint (BrmRMISSLServerSocketFactory.java:95, EP8). An adjacent-network attacker can deliver a crafted serialized payload to achieve arbitrary code execution, exposing all PayDir credentials and enabling manipulation of payment business rules. |
| CVE-2026-18185 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to access sensitive information and modify system configurations due to missing authentication for a critical function. |
| CVE-2026-18184 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw. |
| CVE-2026-18181 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and access sensitive information due to a hard-coded cryptographic key. |
| CVE-2026-18180 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to SQL injection. |
| CVE-2026-18179 | Medium | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to clear active chat sessions due to improper authorization. |
| CVE-2026-18177 | High | 2026-09-23 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized payment actions due to missing authorization checks. |
| CVE-2026-94127 | Critical | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | Exploited | When a BIG-IP APM access policy and an OAuth profile are configured on a virtual server, specific malicious traffic can lead to remote code execution (RCE). This vulnerability is only present when BIG-IP APM is configured as an OAuth Authorization Server. Deployments using APM strictly as an OAuth Client / Resource Server (without OAuth authorization server profiles configured) are not affected by this vulnerability. Impact: This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to perform remote code execution. The BIG-IP system in Appliance mode is also vulnerable. This is a data plane issue; there is no control plane exposure. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. |
| CVE-2026-25255 | High | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Exposed dangerous function lead to privilege escalation via gRPC server. |
| CVE-2026-18176 | High | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information. |
| CVE-2026-18173 | Low | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper enforcement of mutual TLS authentication. |
| CVE-2026-18172 | High | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper restriction of XML external entity references. |
| CVE-2026-18170 | Medium | 2026-09-22 | Not applicable | No public exploit | IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to allocation of resources without limits or throttling. |