Overview 6 matches · 0 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 2 exploited · 1 CISA KEV · 4 public PoC · 3 EPSS ≥ 0.5
6matches
0in Waratek scope0.0%
0protected0.0%
2exploited33.3%
1CISA KEV16.7%
4public PoC66.7%
3EPSS ≥ 0.550.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
0
0.0%
Outside Waratek scope
5
83.3%
Not applicable
1
16.7%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
6
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
2
33.3%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
2
33.3%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
2
33.3%
split by
peak 2 / quarter
Q1 171
Not applicable1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 170
Q3 170
Q4 170
Q1 180
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 190
Q3 190
Q4 191
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q1 200
Q2 202
Outside Waratek scope2
Medium2
not blocked2
Exploited2
Q3 200
Q4 201
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q1 211
Outside Waratek scope1
Medium1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q1 17Q3 17Q1 18Q3 18Q1 19Q3 19Q1 20Q3 20Q1 21
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3449 | Medium | 2021-03-25 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). |
| CVE-2020-1971 | Medium | 2020-12-08 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. OpenSSL itself uses the GENERAL_NAME_cmp function for two purposes: 1) Comparing CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate 2) When verifying that a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token) If an attacker can control both items being compared then that attacker could trigger a crash. For example if the attacker can trick a client or server into checking a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL then this may occur. Note that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. This checking happens prior to the signatures on the certificate and CRL being verified. OpenSSL's s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the "-crl_download" option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools. Note that an unrelated bug means that affected versions of OpenSSL cannot parse or construct correct encodings of EDIPARTYNAME. However it is possible to construct a malformed EDIPARTYNAME that OpenSSL's parser will accept and hence trigger this attack. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 versions are affected by this issue. Other OpenSSL releases are out of support and have not been checked. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1i (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2x (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2w). |
| CVE-2020-11023 | Medium | 2020-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In jQuery versions greater than or equal to 1.0.3 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML containing <option> elements from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. |
| CVE-2020-11022 | Medium | 2020-04-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Exploited | In jQuery starting with 1.12.0 and before 3.5.0, passing HTML from untrusted sources - even after sanitizing it - to one of jQuery's DOM manipulation methods (i.e. .html(), .append(), and others) may execute untrusted code. This problem is patched in jQuery 3.5.0. |
| CVE-2019-1551 | Medium | 2019-12-06 | Outside Waratek scope | No public exploit | There is an overflow bug in the x64_64 Montgomery squaring procedure used in exponentiation with 512-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against 2-prime RSA1024, 3-prime RSA1536, and DSA1024 as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH512 are considered just feasible. However, for an attack the target would have to re-use the DH512 private key, which is not recommended anyway. Also applications directly using the low level API BN_mod_exp may be affected if they use BN_FLG_CONSTTIME. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1e (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1d). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2u (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2t). |
| CVE-2016-9261 | Medium | 2017-02-28 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Tenable Log Correlation Engine (aka LCE) before 4.8.1 allows remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors. |