Overview 4 matches · 1 in Waratek scope · 0 protected · 0 exploited · 0 CISA KEV · 1 public PoC · 0 EPSS ≥ 0.5
4matches
1in Waratek scope25.0%
0protected0.0%
0exploited0.0%
0CISA KEV0.0%
1public PoC25.0%
0EPSS ≥ 0.50.0%
Protected by Waratek
0
0.0%
Rule in development
0
0.0%
Mitigation candidate
0
0.0%
No exploit published
1
25.0%
Outside Waratek scope
1
25.0%
Not applicable
2
50.0%
Withdrawn CVE
0
0.0%
blocked by ARMR today
0
0.0%
partly blocked
0
0.0%
not blocked
4
100.0%
not established
0
0.0%
unrecorded
0
0.0%
Exploited
0
0.0%
Working exploit published
0
0.0%
Proof of concept only
1
25.0%
Forecast only
0
0.0%
No public exploit
3
75.0%
split by
peak 1 / quarter
Q3 171
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 170
Q1 181
Not applicable1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q2 180
Q3 180
Q4 180
Q1 190
Q2 190
Q3 190
Q4 190
Q1 200
Q2 200
Q3 200
Q4 200
Q1 211
Outside Waratek scope1
High1
not blocked1
Proof of concept only1
Q2 211
No exploit published1
High1
not blocked1
No public exploit1
Q4 17Q2 18Q4 18Q2 19Q4 19Q2 20Q4 20Q2 21
| CVE | Severity | Published▾ | Status | Exploitation | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-33560 | High | 2021-06-08 | No exploit published | No public exploit | Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP. |
| CVE-2021-3345 | High | 2021-01-29 | Outside Waratek scope | Proof of concept only | _gcry_md_block_write in cipher/hash-common.c in Libgcrypt version 1.9.0 has a heap-based buffer overflow when the digest final function sets a large count value. It is recommended to upgrade to 1.9.1 or later. |
| CVE-2018-6829 | High | 2018-02-07 | Not applicable | No public exploit | cipher/elgamal.c in Libgcrypt through 1.8.2, when used to encrypt messages directly, improperly encodes plaintexts, which allows attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading ciphertext data (i.e., it does not have semantic security in face of a ciphertext-only attack). The Decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption does not hold for Libgcrypt's ElGamal implementation. |
| CVE-2017-0379 | High | 2017-08-29 | Not applicable | No public exploit | Libgcrypt before 1.8.1 does not properly consider Curve25519 side-channel attacks, which makes it easier for attackers to discover a secret key, related to cipher/ecc.c and mpi/ec.c. |